PLEASE reduce file sizes of posted images!

Like something? Don't like something? Don't see something? Here's the place to provide feedback about the SilentPCReview.com site. User feedback is very important to us -- we really do read the posts in this forum.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee, Edward Ng

Post Reply
ecto
Posts: 106
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 10:22 pm
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Contact:

PLEASE reduce file sizes of posted images!

Post by ecto » Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:57 am

For all of us modemers - there's not many of us, I know, but we DO exist - it's really sad that some threads contain so many big images that the thread essentially becomes unviewable :(

For example, this thread contains almost 1 MB of big images! I waited and waited but it's simply too many KB for me to download. If I want to view such a thread I have to go do something else for 5 minutes then come back. Hardly not an option.. simply too much waiting.

Image size:
There's absolutely no reason for an attached image to be bigger than 640x480. In most cases, 320x240 will do just fine. Should there be a reason to attach a bigger image, please link to it from a smaller image!

File size:
This is what bothers me the most. There's absolutely no reason for a 640x480 image to be bigger than ~70 KB. Most 640x480 images, if compressed to a reasonable level where image quality is still good, will be around 50 KB. As for 320x240 images, there's no reason for them to be bigger than 20 KB.

I realize not all people have image handling programs, and not all people who do have them know how to use them. But most people do, and it's not that hard to take a minute to resize and compress an image before posting it. And if you don't have any image handling program, you can easily adjust the image size setting and quality setting on your digital camera. Most photos of computers, fans, or whatever it could be does not have to be 1024x768 pics in super-fine quality - most often a 320x240 pic in low/medium quality will do just fine.

Sorry if I sound angry, I'm just tired of not being able to view all threads I want to view because of unnecessary large images.

Tibors
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 2674
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 6:07 am
Location: Houten, The Netherlands, Europe

Post by Tibors » Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:21 am

Aside from the reasons ecto mentions. It is in the forum guidelines that pictures should not exceed a width of 500px. The mods on these forums don't act like a police force, like mods on other forums do. That still does not mean you should ignore the rules.

Rusty075
SPCR Reviewer
Posts: 4000
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Contact:

Post by Rusty075 » Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:42 am

Tibors is right. We jump on the ones we notice, but since I think all of us "insiders" run broadband, and with screen resolutions beyond 800x600 (I run at 1600x1024), we sometimes miss offenders.

There's also another good option: Post links instead of images. That lets the reader decide if they want to download them or not.

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:52 am

I've sent a message about this to jamesavery22 regarding those huge files. I had not noticed them before.

Perhaps it is time for SPCR mods to be more proactive about this issue. It is very hard to stop people from doing such things... but in future, after a quick warning, overly big pics will simply be changed to links.

Just post here any other threads that exceed our photo guidelines. Thanks.

Edward Ng
SPCR Reviewer
Posts: 2696
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 9:53 pm
Location: Scarsdale, NY
Contact:

Post by Edward Ng » Tue Oct 26, 2004 4:44 pm

MikeC wrote:Perhaps it is time for SPCR mods to be more proactive about this issue. It is very hard to stop people from doing such things... but in future, after a quick warning, overly big pics will simply be changed to links.
Will do.

quizzicus
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 12:10 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA USA

Clickable thumbnails

Post by quizzicus » Sat Aug 13, 2005 6:33 pm

The BBCode to link from a thumbnail is [url=http://image_url][img]http://thumbnail_url[/img][/url]
I tried it in the test forum, and it works!

cloneman
Posts: 448
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 9:48 am

Post by cloneman » Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:21 am

I think the gallery should take exception to this - I like seeing huge pictures and intimate details of some of these systems.

Depends on the picture, really, but I do agree that anything over 100k in size is probably excessive unless multiple components are featured (e.g. a motherboard shot)

Generally I find the size of pics in SPCR articles to be excellent, so we should use those as a guide.

For quick & dirty photo handling, use Irfanview

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:34 am

cloneman wrote:Generally I find the size of pics in SPCR articles to be excellent, so we should use those as a guide.
The most important dimension is the horizontal one. Most people expect to scroll vertically but don't like having to scroll horizontally. The pics in the SPCR articles are typically no wider than 600 pixels. Once in a while, there'll be an exception to maybe 650 or 700. But any larger than that, and we move to a new browser window.

The other key is to crop effectively. If you only want to focus in on a part of the pic, just crop out the rest and resize if necessary.

qviri
Posts: 2465
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Berlin
Contact:

Post by qviri » Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:40 pm

cloneman wrote:I think the gallery should take exception to this - I like seeing huge pictures and intimate details of some of these systems.
You can always link to a larger version.

Another thing that may not be obvious is compression. I was shocked to discover how much that helped in my gallery thread. The pictures that come out of cameras are raw pixels, uncompressed. Threefold drop in file size with no noticeable quality decrease? Yes please.

kakazza
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 1:27 am

Post by kakazza » Fri Apr 27, 2007 5:32 am

Rusty075 wrote:(I run at 1600x1024)
Weird resolution.


Oh, and I am all for thumbnails, but I do want high-detail pics in 1600x1200+ of the inside of a case.

640x480 for the inside of a case is useless, as is 56k.

Firetech
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 680
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 4:50 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by Firetech » Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:18 pm

kakazza wrote:Oh, and I am all for thumbnails, but I do want high-detail pics in 1600x1200+ of the inside of a case.
640x480 for the inside of a case is useless, as is 56k.
All it takes is the poster to use ImageShack or similar, host their pic at max res (a 1.5Mb jpeg is big enough isn't it?)and drop the provided 'forum thumbnail link' in their post (with a filesize warning) and then surely everyone is happy?

dhanson865
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
Location: TN, USA

Post by dhanson865 » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:54 am

Probably worth mentioning for Windows users that Paint.net is free and quite capable for image editing. You can find it at http://www.getpaint.net/

I'm not a big fan of having to install .NET on my windows PCs but this is the first program that made it seem worth doing for me.

AuraAllan
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 713
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:49 am
Location: Denmark

Post by AuraAllan » Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:33 am

Picture Resizer 2.0 is a very easy-to-use (free) photoresizer.

NeilBlanchard
Moderator
Posts: 7681
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
Contact:

Post by NeilBlanchard » Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:15 pm

Another good, free image editor is IrfanView. It is quite good for all basic cropping and resizing and saving is virtually all image file formats. It also can "stitch" together images, though they have to have the same vertical size.

dhanson865
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
Location: TN, USA

Post by dhanson865 » Sat Sep 11, 2010 8:21 am

I just used the thunmbnail code in this thread and it did take a 900x1340 pic down to 100x100.

Note most of the times I post a pic in a thread I'm linking to another sites content so I have no control over the size of the pic. I have no hosting accounts to put my own thumbnails or resized pic on if they don't provide one.

Is there a BBcode way to resize the image in place if the file size isn't an issue but the image is too wide? Can I just use HTML syntax <img src="image.jpg" width="200" height="150"> or is there a BBcode equivalent?

I saw on another site that uses bb that you could do [img=500x300] but that doesn't seem to work here.

Any chance you could enable that Mike?

Post Reply