Search found 232 matches
- Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:43 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: memtest86+ question with new board and memory...
- Replies: 65
- Views: 19645
Can you pick up one of the modules and see what's the voltage rating on it? You can find it under the model name. Yes, it's 1.8v. The Corsair web page on this memory says 1.9v sometimes, and 1.8v sometimes, but the package itself has 1.8v. Someone was saying that they may have used the same memory ...
- Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:42 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: memtest86+ question with new board and memory...
- Replies: 65
- Views: 19645
The underlying problem with your system is electrical. The signals going between the memory controller and the memory sticks is marginal on one of the data or address lines. Folks who overclock are familiar with this issue, and deal with it by either reducing the clock rate or increasing the voltag...
- Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:54 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: memtest86+ question with new board and memory...
- Replies: 65
- Views: 19645
memtest86+ question with new board and memory...
Hey folks... Still having "fun" with this new file server build. As noted elsewhere, my new rig has: Intel DQ45CB Desktop Motherboard Intel Celeron E3200 Processor (compatible with above board) 2 sticks of Corsair memory (2gb each), model TWIN2X4096-6400C5 (specs match requirements for board) Simple...
- Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:17 am
- Forum: Networking
- Topic: Video playback from homebuilt NAS on gigabit network - slow?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 15512
That'd be hard to test, since I install Ubuntu Server, which doesn't come with any playback facility. I could install X, etc. to check it out, if I feel motivated to do that. I still suspect that VLC itself may have something to do with it... I've never got it working great on shares mounted over a...
- Fri Oct 02, 2009 3:33 pm
- Forum: Networking
- Topic: Video playback from homebuilt NAS on gigabit network - slow?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 15512
I didn't read the whole thread, but I can't believe that your problem is bottlenecked by network speed. Did you check if the problem is a driver and/or codec problem? Does the video play smoothly locally on the target machine? That'd be hard to test, since I install Ubuntu Server, which doesn't com...
- Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:40 am
- Forum: Networking
- Topic: Video playback from homebuilt NAS on gigabit network - slow?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 15512
- Thu Oct 01, 2009 11:49 pm
- Forum: Networking
- Topic: Video playback from homebuilt NAS on gigabit network - slow?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 15512
Well, I tried about every trick in the book that was suggested here, in various permutations, that I could try of an evening, and nothing increased read or write speeds at all. Quite interesting. So I *might* be being limited to my hard drive speed, in which case I'll try the ramdisk idea someone su...
- Thu Oct 01, 2009 9:42 am
- Forum: Networking
- Topic: Video playback from homebuilt NAS on gigabit network - slow?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 15512
Does your router support QOS throttling? If so, enable it. That will prioritize traffic/latency based on the type of traffic. Media streams will take priority over file transfers. Gaming traffic takes priority over everything, etc... What router and switch are you using? How is the network setup (d...
- Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:33 am
- Forum: Networking
- Topic: Video playback from homebuilt NAS on gigabit network - slow?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 15512
Interesting problem! The throughput you quote sounds about right to me for the configuration you described. I would think that's plenty for stutter free DVD playback. Do you have jumbo Ethernet frames enabled for your network cards in both machines? If not, that may improve your throughput further....
- Wed Sep 30, 2009 8:47 pm
- Forum: Networking
- Topic: Video playback from homebuilt NAS on gigabit network - slow?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 15512
Video playback from homebuilt NAS on gigabit network - slow?
Hi all... So I build a fileserver for myself to use instead of those SOHO NAS devices I had. Put Ubuntu Server on it, ran Samba, and exported a folder full of my ripped DVD library. Well, using VLC (even with buffering amped up) plays anything back jerkily (little blips in the playback), and Windows...
- Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:47 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Would I be insane to use a Core i5 for a NAS device?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12394
I just put together a machine for WHS using mostly parts I had, but I did end up purchasing an E3200 and a cheap $25 video card and I have been happy thus far. The whole machine consists of the following * snipped * Yeah, it wouldn't make so much a difference regarding noise if I had a place to PUT...
- Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:27 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: New build - weird inconsistent BIOS behavior... help!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3395
I got the impression that the board does not boot up, however the OP still managed to change bios settings and such. I'm puzzled, how do you change any settings when your board does not boot? "Ah ah ah, look who knows so much! This fellow here is only MOSTLY dead. There's a big difference between M...
- Mon Sep 28, 2009 1:04 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: New build - weird inconsistent BIOS behavior... help!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3395
You've got the Intel DQ45CB right? And given what's on Newegg's page for that I assume you got this Corsair memory: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820145184 That should be fine; most the Intel boards require 1.8V memory and 5-5-5 timings which this has. On Intel boards, I've ...
- Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:23 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: New build - weird inconsistent BIOS behavior... help!
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3395
New build - weird inconsistent BIOS behavior... help!
So I built my file server I'd mentioned here before (Intel motherboard, dual core Celeron). Got the memory on Newegg that was displayed as "people who bought this board bought this memory" (just some decent Corsair memory, looked perfectly compatible with the board). Anyway, the board kept going to ...
- Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:53 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Would I be insane to use a Core i5 for a NAS device?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12394
- Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:35 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Would I be insane to use a Core i5 for a NAS device?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12394
- Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:34 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Would I be insane to use a Core i5 for a NAS device?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12394
My main reasons to choose OpenSolaris for my NAS are centered on ZFS. ZFS provides software RAID, snapshots, and integration with iSCSI, NFS and CIFS. I have been pleased with the performance and manageability of ZFS. Linux can do most of the things that OpenSolaris can, but for me Linux disk manag...
- Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:26 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Would I be insane to use a Core i5 for a NAS device?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12394
You would be extremely hard pressed spend your money better than the component choices you've made. Quiet CPU heatsink and case fans and you're good to go. Thanks! I tried to find the best compromise of power and price. The thing that bugs me is, no matter how hard you look, you'll never find anyth...
- Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:34 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Would I be insane to use a Core i5 for a NAS device?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12394
I built a NAS which has 5 x 1TB drives using OpenSolaris and ZFS. The CPU is a Pentium dual-core E5200, and it provides plenty of horsepower. Even when reading files from the NAS at 50M bytes/s, CPU utilization doesn't often go above 20 percent. Since the CPU is for a NAS, which will likely be alwa...
- Mon Sep 21, 2009 7:55 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Would I be insane to use a Core i5 for a NAS device?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12394
I don't see processing power as a concern for you. With that in mind any one of the dual core celeron e1x00 or Pentium e2x00 would work well. You might even consider the Celeron 420/430 single core would work fine and only set you back $40. It is a comparable processor to the single core AMD others...
- Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:14 am
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Would I be insane to use a Core i5 for a NAS device?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12394
Agreed, I don't think you will get any benefit from going with that expensive CPU if it is just going to be used as a NAS. Save your money. If you have an older but serviceable CPU/motherboard lying around with enough SATA ports, you could consider using that. If you want new hardware, go the Sempr...
- Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:24 pm
- Forum: CPUs and Motherboards
- Topic: Would I be insane to use a Core i5 for a NAS device?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12394
Would I be insane to use a Core i5 for a NAS device?
Hi all... So I'm building a NAS for storing my home media library, and I want it to run reasonably cool and quietly. With 4 3.5" drives in a fann'd hot-swap drive unit I got, plus fans in the case I chose, it's not going to be super-quiet, but it'll do. One thing I'm looking at is what motherboard a...
- Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:55 pm
- Forum: Cases and Damping
- Topic: Smallest quiet case to hold 4-5 drives?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5085
Thanks for all your suggestions, folks! In the end, I settled for a small tower. Best I could find that met my specs, that was available relatively easily, was this: http://www.lian-li.com/v2/en/product/product06.php?pr_index=313&cl_index=1&sc_index=25&ss_index=63 The Lian-li PC-A06F. Hopefully this...
- Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:23 pm
- Forum: Cases and Damping
- Topic: Smallest quiet case to hold 4-5 drives?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5085
You've missed what might be your ideal case. What is 10.24" x 5.51" x 10.24", takes a mini-ITX board, supports a slimline CD drive (if you so desire), and has four hot-swappable 3.5" bays + an internal 2.5" bay? http://www.logicsupply.com/images/photos/cases/es34069_pic1_big.jpg Chenbro ES34069 Not...
- Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:42 pm
- Forum: Cases and Damping
- Topic: Smallest quiet case to hold 4-5 drives?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5085
looks quite expensive.. how often do you plan on swapping drives? i have a tendency myself to over-engineer things; those hot-swappable bays alone might cost as much as another 2-3 terabytes of storage :) Probably not that often, honestly... but I like the *idea* of it. :-) And you're right, almost...
- Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:11 pm
- Forum: Cases and Damping
- Topic: Smallest quiet case to hold 4-5 drives?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5085
well it's not exactly what you want, but rosewill makes a microatx case that takes 4 internal 3.5" drives (i believe you can fit a 5th/6th one in the external bays), uses a full-atx psu, uses 120mm fans, and only costs $25. see here Thanks for the suggestion! Good tiny little case, tho' I'm a littl...
- Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:30 pm
- Forum: Cases and Damping
- Topic: Smallest quiet case to hold 4-5 drives?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5085
You need 3x the number of drives if you use 2.5" instead of 3.5" and target for some capacity that actually needs 4x3.5" like you said in the first place. Then you start to get limited by the number of SATA ports on your mobo. And I don't think it will be any quieter with that many drives. Probably...
- Sat Sep 12, 2009 2:25 pm
- Forum: Cases and Damping
- Topic: Smallest quiet case to hold 4-5 drives?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 5085
Smallest quiet case to hold 4-5 drives?
Hi folks... I've gotten tired of shelling out money for dedicated NAS devices; besides them always seeming to require starting from blank discs that they format and manage for me, and using the cheapest components the NAS companies could find, they also are just limited in their abilities. So I've d...
- Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:23 pm
- Forum: System Advice / Troubleshooting
- Topic: Front panel button no longer wakes computer...
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2653
- Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:04 pm
- Forum: System Advice / Troubleshooting
- Topic: Front panel button no longer wakes computer...
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2653
The front power button is nothing more than a normally open momentary contact switch. In other words, it simply shorts together the two pins on the motherboard that it connects to. Your problem is almost certainly software, not hardware. That's what I would think; but honestly, it is acting complet...