folding with CnQ
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:07 am
- Location: UK
folding with CnQ
Took me bloody ages to realise that the reason I've not noticed any folding performance increase in the move from XP2100 to Sempron 3200 is that Cool n Quiet seems to be capping the CPU at 1Ghz when I'm not doing much else.
Anyone know if there's a way for F@H to appear on CnQ's radar, as it were? I don't want to run this thing at full tilt round the clock but I'm pretty sure I can contribute more than CnQ is currently allowing....
Anyone know if there's a way for F@H to appear on CnQ's radar, as it were? I don't want to run this thing at full tilt round the clock but I'm pretty sure I can contribute more than CnQ is currently allowing....
Maybe this is the reason?
http://folding.stanford.edu/faq.html#run.corepriority
http://folding.stanford.edu/faq.html#run.corepriority
How to change F@H priorityWhy does adjusting the core process priority via the task manager not affect its performance? How do I manually adjust the priority of the Folding@home core? Currently when users try to change the priority of the core via the Windows NT/2000/XP task manager this does not affect how much CPU the core gets. The reason for this is that the work is done by the core thread, which is fixed to run at idle priority and is not affected by the task manager priority for the process (which displays as 'normal' by default). In order to change the priority manually users must use a program that allows thread-level priority adjustments.
Ok
Right Click on the Folding Applet icon in the task bar
Select Configure
Select Advanced Tab
There is a CPU usage percent slider that you can move up or down at the top of the Advanced Page
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:07 am
- Location: UK
Interesting - not sure what sort of application they mean but perhaps I'll get something on the f@h community site.jaganath wrote:Maybe this is the reason?
http://folding.stanford.edu/faq.html#run.corepriority
Why does adjusting the core process priority via the task manager not affect its performance? How do I manually adjust the priority of the Folding@home core? Currently when users try to change the priority of the core via the Windows NT/2000/XP task manager this does not affect how much CPU the core gets. The reason for this is that the work is done by the core thread, which is fixed to run at idle priority and is not affected by the task manager priority for the process (which displays as 'normal' by default). In order to change the priority manually users must use a program that allows thread-level priority adjustments.
Yeah - did that already and also selected higher priority using the radio button but no change.How to change F@H priority
Ok
Right Click on the Folding Applet icon in the task bar
Select Configure
Select Advanced Tab
There is a CPU usage percent slider that you can move up or down at the top of the Advanced Page
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:07 am
- Location: UK
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:07 am
- Location: UK
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:07 am
- Location: UK
Yep - PSU has a 120mm fan which the HS half overlaps and then the 120mm tri-cool on it's lowest setting.
Currently, with f@h running, Speedfan sees nothing above 40 degrees. The core temp shows as 34 degrees.
Couldn't tell you exactly what the ambient temp is but it is quite cool at the moment.
The Xilence, although pretty quiet, isn't exactly silent and is now pretty evident without the cpu fan running. That said, I wouldn't hear it if there was music playing at normal levels.
I'll have a better idea how workable this is once I've got a project to work on and have various adobe apps running alongside browsers etc - it's not really being stressed to much just now.
Currently, with f@h running, Speedfan sees nothing above 40 degrees. The core temp shows as 34 degrees.
Couldn't tell you exactly what the ambient temp is but it is quite cool at the moment.
The Xilence, although pretty quiet, isn't exactly silent and is now pretty evident without the cpu fan running. That said, I wouldn't hear it if there was music playing at normal levels.
I'll have a better idea how workable this is once I've got a project to work on and have various adobe apps running alongside browsers etc - it's not really being stressed to much just now.
You could play with RMclock or cyrstalcupid to adjust the cool and quiet options. That is a cool trick though. Cool and quiet but still folding. While your folding score is lower you electricity bill is lower as well.
Do you have the folding set to only use a percentage of the cpu? That might do it.
Do you have the folding set to only use a percentage of the cpu? That might do it.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:07 am
- Location: UK
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:07 am
- Location: UK
I would suggest RMClock. It is a great utility. With adjusted voltages I get about 10ºC lower temperatures in my CPU when idle (at 800MHz) and about 15ºC lower on load (at 2GHz) in my athlon64 3000 with 89W TDP.
I also use it in my laptop (2GHz PentiumM), and now the fan is off most of the time. I was able adjust the voltage in the pentiumM to 0,8V when idle!!
The tool is very configurable, it allows several states to configure, not only idle and maximun, you can configure intermediate states. One of the best tools I've seen for computer quieters like us
I also use it in my laptop (2GHz PentiumM), and now the fan is off most of the time. I was able adjust the voltage in the pentiumM to 0,8V when idle!!
The tool is very configurable, it allows several states to configure, not only idle and maximun, you can configure intermediate states. One of the best tools I've seen for computer quieters like us
Yeah, RMclock is a good tool. I use crystalCPUID to do the same thing. The problem with folding is that it holds your cpu at 100% all the time and cool and quiet is no longer usefull. Yes, i can undervolt with RMclock but that is not what i want to do.
I want to set my folding@home to such a low priority that even cool and quiet does not realize it is working so it will clock the system at 1Ghz and 1.1V when "idle (not doing anything else except folding@home)" If I can fold without it affecting the operation of CnQ, that could save me some power and heat while still allowing my server to use its full reasources when it really needs them.
I want to set my folding@home to such a low priority that even cool and quiet does not realize it is working so it will clock the system at 1Ghz and 1.1V when "idle (not doing anything else except folding@home)" If I can fold without it affecting the operation of CnQ, that could save me some power and heat while still allowing my server to use its full reasources when it really needs them.