Putting a fan on the older version of the Zalman ZM80

They make noise, too.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
Pjotor
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 9:06 pm
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Putting a fan on the older version of the Zalman ZM80

Post by Pjotor » Sun Mar 21, 2004 11:07 pm

I have a spare fan, which I have slapped onto my Zalman VGA heatsink (the first, passive version) which cools a 9700 Pro. I put it on the upper sink -- the one on the card's backside. My idea is that by cooling that part, the heatpipe will be able to work with a larger temperature gradient, and thus improve the cooling.

Could someone with adequate knowledge about physics and/or heatpipes tell me if -- and why -- this setup is good or bad? Should I put the fan on the other heatsink part instead?

halcyon
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 1115
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 3:52 am
Location: EU

Post by halcyon » Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:10 am

If you can, mount the fan like this:

http://www2.ko-soku.co.jp/partskit/KD_ZM80OP1.jpg

(the image above is from ZM80C, but there should be ways to do similar mountings on ZM80A-version as well).

In my experience it offers the best cooling benefits (core block, both big heatsinks, heatpipe and memory chips).

Pjotor
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 9:06 pm
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Post by Pjotor » Mon Mar 22, 2004 2:11 am

Halcyon,

thank you for the answer. Out of curiosity -- does someone know the answer to my original question (which HS should be fanned)?

Nowhere_man
Posts: 190
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 5:50 am
Location: USA

Post by Nowhere_man » Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:41 am

Are you seeing any temp/performance difference with the fan on top?

juansolo
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 11:45 am
Location: Wakefield, England

Post by juansolo » Tue Mar 30, 2004 12:14 am

I had the same issue. I got around it by using a Zalman bracket and 92mm fan. This way you can mount the fan the same way that the later ZM-80's do and cool both heatsinks.

Image

Pjotor
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 9:06 pm
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Post by Pjotor » Tue Mar 30, 2004 12:41 am

Cool, thanks!

IceFire
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: USA

Post by IceFire » Wed Apr 14, 2004 1:47 pm

I don't remember from where, but I read about someone putting a fan on the bottom and than switch to the one on top. The cooling was better with the fan on the backside (top) heatsink. The card was vertical and not horzontial like you had it.
Last edited by IceFire on Thu Apr 15, 2004 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Pjotor
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 9:06 pm
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Post by Pjotor » Wed Apr 14, 2004 10:42 pm

The cooling was better with the fan on the backside (top) heatsink.
Logical reasoning tells me it should be correct. By cooling the backside, the temperature difference between the frontside and the backside should increase, and thus the heatpipe would work better. Anyone against?

Post Reply