Actually I also have an Accelero S1 on a Radeon 3850 with which I just used their pre-applied RAM sink tape. They're still stuck on too. I swear by the "heat and pressure" trick.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
With all due respect to Xbitlabs, the Setsugen 2 only lost to 3-slot coolers which are totally impractical for CrossfireX. They also weren't creative enough to configure the Setsugen 2 with a PWM fanm1st wrote:ISo I bought the Setsugen 2. Initially I was worried since it got a poor review on Xbitlabs.
I have the same card, haven't gotten to testing it in games or Furmark (YET), but at idle, it's LOUD. Well, I might be a little spoiled by my previous vid card- the Gigabyte's GTX 460 OC (with Windforce 2 cooling)- which was very-very quiet idle (fans 40% (minimum level) = ~1600rpm) and not overly noisy under load, but I still think, it's justified to require the cooler to be almost inaudible/quiet at idle...maxxxim wrote:Some card makers released a new version of 6950 example this one:
http://www.club-3d.com/index.php/produc ... -6950.html
It is really easy to replace stock cooler to Accelero S1 rev2 with this card - open 4 screws, clean GPU, apply new paste and attach new cooler to place. No need to add any additional heatsinks. And I unlocked all shaders on this new card also without any problem using this script:
http://forums.techpowerup.com/showpost. ... tcount=381
Great great job!!!swaaye wrote:I'm reporting in that the Thermalright T-Rad2 GTX fits 6950 perfectly. With the 2 included 92mm Thermalright fans at 7v, the card stays under 80C in Furmark and it is essentially inaudible (I can't hear it in my quiet case). This considerably outperforms the Accelero S1 with 800RPM 120mm attached.
![]()
![]()
This was it with the Accelero S1 attached.(and prior to backplate re-attachment and modified VRM cooler chunk)
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thus, the only thing we need is a comparison between the Setsugen 2 and the TR T-Rad2 GTX...m1st wrote:I'm reporting that the Setsugen 2 is almost the perfect cooler for the Radeon 6950. I bought a Radeon 6950, unlocked the shaders, and overclocked it. With the stock fan, temps idled in the 50's and load hit 90C. Also, at idle the fan was clearly audible in my system.
So I bought the Setsugen 2. Initially I was worried since it got a poor review on Xbitlabs. My main concerns were whether the heatsink assembly would block easy access to the PCI-E power connectors, and whether the heatsinks would properly cool the VRM area on the 6950. The heatsink ends just before the PCI-E power connectors, so these are easily removed without problem if you need to remove the card. Also, the Setsugen 2 comes with a long heatsink designed for the VRM of the 58xx series. This works perfectly on the 6950. Best of all, it uses screws to actually screw into the PCB, no adhesive needed!
The RAMsinks have thermal tape of questionable integrity, so I removed the tape and used Arctic Silver adhesive instead. The RAMsinks work well enough, but they get hot to the touch. In my unprofessional opinion, I think that they are cooled better in this setup compared to the stock setup, since in the stock setup a lot of heat is transferred from the GPU core. There is one other VRM component to the left of the left-most RAM chip, and I had to be a little more liberal in my application of adhesive for its heatsink, but it worked perfectly.
Temps at the lowest fan speed (inaudible in my system) are 35 idle, ~65 playing Assassin's Creed 2. I'm sure Furmark would get some rediculous temperature, but I don't like rendering fuzzy donuts all day...
I am completely and wholly satisfied with the Setsugen 2. The only reason why I say that it's only 'almost perfect' is that I had to use adhesive to attach the RAMsinks and the last sink onto the last VRM component. Also, since I have a fan controller, the fan controller on the Setsugen is superfluous.
They probably say it's incompatible because of VRM cooling. I'm not sure if the little heatsinks that they tend to include with these kits are enough to cool the VRMs on the high-end cards. Also the tape they are attached with is iffy and if they fall off you are in big trouble. So I just cut off that section of the stock cooler and took advantage of the excellent screw mounting opportunity there.Mousemagician wrote:I was discouraged to use it on the 6950 since the manufacturer states that it's NOT compatible with the 6950, but you demonstrated the opposite!![]()
One question: are the TR fans 3 pins or PWM?
Thank you for your reply, it's very interesting.swaaye wrote:They probably say it's incompatible because of VRM cooling. I'm not sure if the little heatsinks that they tend to include with these kits are enough to cool the VRMs on the high-end cards. Also the tape they are attached with is iffy and if they fall off you are in big trouble. So I just cut off that section of the stock cooler and took advantage of the excellent screw mounting opportunity there.Mousemagician wrote:I was discouraged to use it on the 6950 since the manufacturer states that it's NOT compatible with the 6950, but you demonstrated the opposite!![]()
One question: are the TR fans 3 pins or PWM?
The fans are 3 pin. I just set them up on a constant 7v supply with the old 12-5 fan power mod. It is more than enough to cool the card and it is inaudible.
Yes I just cut off the part of the stock plate that has the VRM cooler. The blower motor comes off with three screws and there are only two narrow sections of metal to cut through. But I also had to remove the handle-like vertical piece that goes around the PCIe power plugs because it was too tall. Look on the previous page of this thread for some illustrations I put up.Omoe wrote:Swaaye you just cut the original vrm cooler of the stock heatsink??
Furmark runs the card up to around 80C with my nearly silent 7v setup. It blows away the stock cooler which would have the fan screaming to hold 90C in the same situation. In actual gaming the card tends to be around 60-70C (games vary considerably). At idle it is usually under 40C.Omoe wrote:Can you post some GPU-Z temps while running Furmark?
Can I ask you to post a screenshot of gpu-z temps during stresstest? I'm mainly interested about the VRM temps. Most of them are nicely tucked below the heatsink so they should get good cooling, but the one in the upper left corner is sitting there exposed.Mize wrote:Okay, I finally finished my Scythe Setsugen-2 set-up. The results are what I would consider bordering on phenomenal.
To recap, one card (top in picture) is a 6950 flashed to 6970.
The other card is a genuine 6970.
The case is a CoolerMaster HAF 932 with great airflow.
The modification is a Scythe Setsugen-2 on each using the stock backplate and NOT using the fans that came with the cooler. The fans that came with the cooler are manually controlled. I have substituted Scythe Slip Stream Slim fans with PWM (had to order direct from Scythe). The solution fits in the same width - 2 slots total - (but taller) than the stock cooler).
Prior to modification my idle temps were in the 30s with Furmark hitting 90 C.
After mods my idles are 24-26 C (in a 21 C room) and Furmark tops out at 60-61C.
[Edit: at swaaye's bidding I ran Furmark scary-longer and it actually keeps climbing to 79C on the lower GPU and 80C on the upper. Still pretty good.]
Here's the final effort:
Basically I've taken the PWM signal from the graphics card, split it into two and fed this to some other fan connectors.kensiko wrote:Your fan connection intrigues me, you say the power is coming from the motherboard ? How ? You can be technical.
I was thinking about getting some Enzotech Mos-C1 for the 8 VRM Mosfets. I'm too afraid to stick my finger on the stock Thermalright sinks to check the heat just in case they fall off. They've been in a week now though and I've played maybe 10+ hours of BFBC2 at 100% GPU load and I haven't had any artifacts or graphical crashes besides the usual BC2 Punkbuster crashes.Omoe wrote:I wonder if those vrm heatsinks are enough to cool it down.
You have more airflow with the shaman than the stock fan, but still i do not know.
Latest version of GPU-Z lists VReg temperature.lazygun wrote:...but has anyone found out how you can measure the temps of the VRM's?
Indeed.twit wrote:Latest version of GPU-Z lists VReg temperature.lazygun wrote:...but has anyone found out how you can measure the temps of the VRM's?
The MSI being a non-reference design cannot be shader unlocked, and the memory speeds are just two different ways of listing the same thing, ie the memory speed of the two cards is identical. The MSI one you buy to not have to swap cooler or tinker with, as in a tight CF configuration for example.doveman wrote:Which of these two would people recommend