Thread about increasing Reserator performance

The alternative to direct air cooling

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
1911user
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 12:08 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Thread about increasing Reserator performance

Post by 1911user » Sat Sep 04, 2004 10:39 am

OCforums has a thread going about increasing the performance of a reserator. http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=326603

Effectively, the idea is to shroud the reserator. A 120mm fan at the top exhausts the air that has been drawn up the shroud. With a slow fan, this might be a quiet way to increase performance. There is performance data from someone, but I think it's in French :shock:

DryFire
Posts: 1076
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 8:29 am
Location: USA

Post by DryFire » Sat Sep 04, 2004 12:04 pm

the graphs are in french but even someone who doesn't understand frnch should get it.

that is a rather large difference.

1911user
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 12:08 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Post by 1911user » Sat Sep 04, 2004 1:01 pm

Just a little bit of airflow does wonders for cooling.

1911user
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 12:08 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Post by 1911user » Sun Sep 05, 2004 8:09 am

Here's a gem that may be of interest:

attaching a tube from the water inlet (inside the reserator) to bring the warm water to the top does work a 3 ceclius miracle when nothing else has changed, and is not any more noisy

Edward Ng
SPCR Reviewer
Posts: 2696
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 9:53 pm
Location: Scarsdale, NY
Contact:

Post by Edward Ng » Sun Sep 05, 2004 8:20 am

Hey if anybody comes out with a really nicely made, commercially available, "Fan-Cap/Shroud" for the Reserator I that fits 80, 92 or 120mm fans and sells it as a kit, they might make a bit of money on it! Or better yet, include the special tube to push hot inlet water to the top and make it a Reserator Enhancement Package!

Come to think of it, with how the thing must be cheap and all, maybe even a return on investment would highly unlikely. I am not sure there's enough Reserators being sold to make selling a cheap upgrade kit profitable...

-Ed

Greg_R
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 1:23 pm

Post by Greg_R » Thu Sep 09, 2004 2:04 pm

I stick my tower over the A/C vent (periodic super-cooling).

Thanks 1911user, I was wondering about attaching an internal tube in the reserator...

Jolt
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2002 7:36 am
Location: Linköping, Sweden, EU
Contact:

Post by Jolt » Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:27 am

1911user wrote:Here's a gem that may be of interest:

attaching a tube from the water inlet (inside the reserator) to bring the warm water to the top does work a 3 ceclius miracle when nothing else has changed, and is not any more noisy
Hehe, that's pretty funny ;)

That was actually the first thing I thought about when I read the SPCR review of the Reserator and saw what it looked like inside. :)

TheDarkHacker
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:09 am
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Post by TheDarkHacker » Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:33 pm

making the duct for the reserator wouldnt be very hard. just get some construction paper or thing aluminum and wrap it around the reserator and simply mount a fan ontop. this might take away some of the sleekness though. with the price of the reserator going down though you could always just run 2 reserators in a series and get lot better cooling potential.just think of how good of temps you would have with 2 reserators wth the shoud thing and a low noise fan

DryFire
Posts: 1076
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 8:29 am
Location: USA

Post by DryFire » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:18 pm

or you could just use a normal rad with a custom water cooling system.....

just a thought.

tatup
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 1:09 pm

Post by tatup » Mon Sep 13, 2004 11:32 pm

1911user wrote:Here's a gem that may be of interest:

attaching a tube from the water inlet (inside the reserator) to bring the warm water to the top does work a 3 ceclius miracle when nothing else has changed, and is not any more noisy
Did you just stick some tube inside the inlet or is there a trick to it?

1911user
Posts: 109
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 12:08 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Post by 1911user » Tue Sep 14, 2004 1:48 pm

I don't own a reserator, that was a quote from the thread at ocforums.com.
If you figure out specifics of how to attach the tubing, I'm sure others would like to know.

ascii
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 1:10 am
Location: Sweden

Post by ascii » Tue Sep 21, 2004 3:42 pm

Has somebode tried to make a chimney for the reserator? The shape of the resorator should make it pretty ideal for creating a stack effect.

If you where to make a 2 m high chimney around the reserator, the airflow should more than double, according to my (sketchy) calculations. A chimney wold decrease natural convection, so I'm not sure what the real-world difference would be, but somebody should be able to find a few really thick paper tubes or something and tape them together to form an experimental chimney.

I plan on getting a Resorator with my next paycheck, so maybe I'll do some experimenting.

Mr_Smartepants
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:35 am
Location: Cambridgeshire, England

Post by Mr_Smartepants » Tue Sep 21, 2004 6:30 pm

Just remember that the stock reserator pump only has a head pressure of 0.5M (about 18 inches). If you put a tube on the inlet pipe inside the reserator make sure it's less than a foot or you'll make that tiny pump work overtime to overcome the pressure.

Just a thought.

ascii
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 1:10 am
Location: Sweden

Post by ascii » Wed Sep 22, 2004 12:28 am

A chimney would not put more strain on the pump at all. A chimney works kind of like a heatpipe, but with air. The air that is warmed by the reserator has a higher temperature than the ambient room temperature (duh), which means it will have a higher volume and a lower density. Because of this, there is a (very weak) force that pushes the air upwards. If you put a tube or open ended box of some sort (a chimney) around the reserator, this will mean that as the warm air rises, it won't mix with the cooler air and keep accelerating upwards, sucking more hot air with it and increasing the airflow. As long as the air doesn't cool of, if will keep on accelerating in the chimney, meaning that a higher chimney will lead to more airflow. This effect is called the stack effect and has been discussed before on these forums. If my calculations are correct, for small temperature differences (much less than 293 K) the acceleration of the air is 0.003m/(s^2K). This could be enough to get a small draft out of a 2 m chimney, but we won't know until someone tries it.

Mr_Smartepants
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:35 am
Location: Cambridgeshire, England

Post by Mr_Smartepants » Wed Sep 22, 2004 10:02 pm

tatup wrote:
1911user wrote:Here's a gem that may be of interest:

attaching a tube from the water inlet (inside the reserator) to bring the warm water to the top does work a 3 ceclius miracle when nothing else has changed, and is not any more noisy
Did you just stick some tube inside the inlet or is there a trick to it?
Sorry, I was refering to the above post. The fact that the inlet and outlet pipe openings are only about an inch away from each other may allow the just heated water to reenter the system without the benefit of being cooled. Putting a short pipe INSIDE the reserator to separate the inlet/outlet openings is a fundamentally good idea. Too bad Zalman put such a low powered pump with a low head pressure inside.
That is what I was refering too.

As to a shroud over the OUTSIDE of the reserator, that should increase the velocity of the air passing over the vanes and get better cooling performance. Although, like you said, in theory. I'm inclined to think that the static cooling performance might actually be better as Zalman designed it. The reserator would have access to a greater volume of air than if you used a 'chimney'. We won't know until someone tries it out and compares.

Straker
Posts: 657
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 11:10 pm
Location: AB, Canada
Contact:

Post by Straker » Wed Sep 22, 2004 10:10 pm

still shouldn't make a difference, as long as the tube doesn't go above the actual water level - pretend the "inlet tube" is actually partitioning the Reserator in half, with the inlet on one side and outlet on the other, basically turning the reserator into a hose. you aren't actually pumping the water any higher, since it's being replaced by water coming from the same maximum height.

ascii
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 1:10 am
Location: Sweden

Post by ascii » Thu Sep 23, 2004 6:00 am

Straker: You are forgetting that hoses have internal resistance. Just keeping the water flowing throgh the hoses is not a neglectable part of the work a pump has to do in a WC system. I guess you could easily fit a really thick hose with minimal resistance inside the reserator if you could just find some way to fit it on the outlet.

jamesavery22
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 3:19 pm

Post by jamesavery22 » Thu Sep 23, 2004 6:39 am

ascii wrote:Straker: You are forgetting that hoses have internal resistance. Just keeping the water flowing throgh the hoses is not a neglectable part of the work a pump has to do in a WC system. I guess you could easily fit a really thick hose with minimal resistance inside the reserator if you could just find some way to fit it on the outlet.
If the hose is a straight line it wont make much of a difference as long as the ID of the tube is >= the hole in that cap.
Bends are what you have to worry about...

Rusty075
SPCR Reviewer
Posts: 4000
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Contact:

Post by Rusty075 » Thu Sep 23, 2004 7:13 am

Roughly speaking, each foot of 1/2"-ish ID hose is equivalent to .1' of reduction in pump head. And each 90° elbow is equivalent to 2' of linear hose length in terns of resistance.

Post Reply