My cooling towers(pics), not finished.

The alternative to direct air cooling

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
jamesavery22
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 3:19 pm

My cooling towers(pics), not finished.

Post by jamesavery22 » Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:47 am

Image
Image
Image
Image

Pump and block should be in soon and I'll post results. Just wanted to share my progress :D

DryFire
Posts: 1076
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 8:29 am
Location: USA

Post by DryFire » Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:17 pm

are those transmission coolers?

TheDarkHacker
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 10:09 am
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

Post by TheDarkHacker » Mon Oct 18, 2004 12:45 pm

ya those are transmission coolers. i suggest you put the duct all the way down the coolers and maybe somehow mount a 120mm fan on top because that will give you more airflow and will be quiter

Mr_Smartepants
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:35 am
Location: Cambridgeshire, England

Post by Mr_Smartepants » Mon Oct 18, 2004 4:28 pm

That's a pretty elegant design!
:D
What are your clearances between the fan blade tips and the internal wall of the tubes? The closer the clearances, the more efficient the airflow will be. If you can't get the clearances tight enough, you might experience pressure loss or blade tip turbulence. You might be better served by using a 80/92mm->tube adapter and bolt quiet 80/92mm fans to the adapters. That would increase both airflow and efficiency.
Although, you can't deny that with the exception of the wiring, it's really eye-catching. :D

Pjotor
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 9:06 pm
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Post by Pjotor » Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:49 pm

What's the size of the coolers? It's hard to judge from the pictures...

Bat
Posts: 279
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 12:09 pm
Location: U.K.

Post by Bat » Tue Oct 19, 2004 8:15 am

Looks smart.
Suggestions:
1. Extend the tubes downwards almost to the bottom of the fins.
2. Extend the tubes upwards as high as possible (perhaps to a foot below the ceiling) and you might find you no longer need fans. If you do this, it would also help to make the tubes wider in the section above the fins. It might be convenient to combine the two smoothly into one for the upper section.

DrCR
Posts: 538
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 11:55 am

Post by DrCR » Tue Nov 09, 2004 2:53 pm

Bat wrote: 2. Extend the tubes upwards as high as possible (perhaps to a foot below the ceiling) and you might find you no longer need fans. If you do this, it would also help to make the tubes wider in the section above the fins. It might be convenient to combine the two smoothly into one for the upper section.
Why would that work?

ChucuSCAD
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 255
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 12:40 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Contact:

Post by ChucuSCAD » Tue Nov 09, 2004 4:03 pm

DrCR wrote:
Bat wrote: 2. Extend the tubes upwards as high as possible (perhaps to a foot below the ceiling) and you might find you no longer need fans. If you do this, it would also help to make the tubes wider in the section above the fins. It might be convenient to combine the two smoothly into one for the upper section.
Why would that work?

Extending the tubes like this will generate what is known as "stack effect". Hott air naturally rises and will suck in cool air at the bottom. The longer the tube the better this works, even though the heat source is at the bottom.

However I think purchasing 2 8' long clear tubes would be too costly to simply try out.
try plugging your #'s into this link:
http://chuck-wright.com/calculators/stack_effect.html

and see what happens, if it looks promising I would go that route.

If not I would suggest mounting a 120mm-80/92mm adapter to the top of the tube and use a low speed fan to suck air out of the top.


chucuSCAD

jamesavery22
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 3:19 pm

Post by jamesavery22 » Wed Nov 10, 2004 1:11 pm

right now Im running them passive (just yanked the fans off). 20c ambient, 41c load 24/7. Im going to removew the tubes and see how it effects temps. Im also going to add 3 low flow blocks (NB, GPU, PSU).

But thats up and running right now so I'll leave it be while I finalize my other project (the large heatsink one). Got tons to do and no time...

neologan
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2003 11:29 am

Post by neologan » Fri Nov 12, 2004 8:24 am

Looks really nice, what a good idea. What's the spec of your rig to get that 41c load temp passively?

Bat
Posts: 279
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 12:09 pm
Location: U.K.

Post by Bat » Wed Nov 17, 2004 12:32 pm

Could try the tall chimney with cardboard or whatever first to see how well it works, only changing to something prettier if successful.

jamesavery22
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 3:19 pm

Post by jamesavery22 » Thu Nov 18, 2004 1:06 pm

neologan wrote:Looks really nice, what a good idea. What's the spec of your rig to get that 41c load temp passively?
Was a barton clocked at 11x183mhz, raised it to 11x200mhz so its right at 3200+ specs, at 23c room temp passive temps are 44-45c. But now I need new ram =( My pc3000 doesnt play well at 400mhz since I cant raise the voltage.

Im adding a GPU block, NB block, and a PSU block, Im sure my temps will hit mid 50s while passive. But I'll be placing the PC in my living room which is much more open and much colder.

Im removing the "chimnys" all together to see how temps go. I want as much of the fins exposed to the air as possible. I'll play with something like a cardboard shroud later to see if it gets better temps.

jamesavery22
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 3:19 pm

Post by jamesavery22 » Wed Feb 02, 2005 5:29 pm

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Post Reply