ZOTAC GeForce GT 640 ZONE Edition Fanless GPU

Want to talk about one of the articles in SPCR? Here's the forum for you.
Post Reply
Lawrence Lee
SPCR Reviewer
Posts: 1115
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:07 pm
Location: Vancouver

ZOTAC GeForce GT 640 ZONE Edition Fanless GPU

Post by Lawrence Lee » Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:57 pm


andyb
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Essex, England

Re: ZOTAC GeForce GT 640 ZONE Edition Fanless GPU

Post by andyb » Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:38 am

To me there looks like there is a serious design/manufacturing flaw with the cooler.

Please correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the main point of heatpipes, is that the liquid inside gets boiled via the hot component and then evaporates up the pipe towards fins which then cool the liquid, the liquid then runs back down and gets boiled Ad infinitum.

How can the liquid get boiled if the pipes are crushed flat 2+ inches from the GPU core.? The picture I am referring to is at the bottom of page 2.

If this is compared to the following product linked below, it is clear from any of the pictures that the heatpipes are not crushed (yes I do realise that there is an extra heatpipe and far more fins and that was tested on the old GPU test rig), but the cooling performance is significantly better for a product that outputs a similar amount of heat.

http://www.silentpcreview.com/article1249-page2.html


Andy
Main PC, P180, CM Silent Pro 500M, i5 3570k @ 4.2Ghz, 8-GB @ 2,400MHz, 512GB 850 EVO, 500 Extreme II, 2x 2.5" drives, MSI 660Ti Twin Frozr.
Server, under reconstruction, 380W Enermax Pro82+, positive pressure only.

edh
Posts: 1618
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: UK

Re: ZOTAC GeForce GT 640 ZONE Edition Fanless GPU

Post by edh » Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:00 pm

So not great then. It does also seem perilously close in price to the much more powerful GTX650, there are some very creatively cooled versions of that like this MSI:
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/ge ... iew,1.html

I haven't thus far seen a passive GTX650 but I see no reason why it would not be possible by adding an Accelero S1 Plus. At UK prices this would come out as only £30 more than the GT640 for much more card.
Raijintek Metis: i5-6400, Scythe Ninja 4, Asus Z170i Pro Gaming, 8Gb RAM, GTX 950, Crucial 250Gb M.2, Seasonic X-400

autoboy
Posts: 1008
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:10 pm
Location: San Jose, California

Re: ZOTAC GeForce GT 640 ZONE Edition Fanless GPU

Post by autoboy » Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:09 pm

RAM sells video cards. That's why the low end cards feature a lot of RAM, then as you step up to real gaming cards such as the 7770 you drop back down to 1GB. I can't tell you how many times a friend tells me about how he got a full 2GB of RAM on his video card for me to find out it is something like an Nvidia 520 that is actually slower than his HD4000 igp.

edh
Posts: 1618
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: UK

Re: ZOTAC GeForce GT 640 ZONE Edition Fanless GPU

Post by edh » Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:18 pm

Very true and even so on the same cards when a manufacturer offers a model with more RAM than the normal models. I fell into this trap many years ago by paying £10 more to have a Geforce FX5600 256Mb as opposed to the 128Mb version. What I didn't realise when I bought it (oh the lack of information we had in those days compared to now!) was that the RAM was clocked slower. I did end up BIOS flashing it back up to the full 550MHz but it never had much headroom beyond that, not to mention the complications it brought for RAM heatsinks over the years. I still have that card with an Accelero S2 strapped to it...
Raijintek Metis: i5-6400, Scythe Ninja 4, Asus Z170i Pro Gaming, 8Gb RAM, GTX 950, Crucial 250Gb M.2, Seasonic X-400

CA_Steve
Moderator
Posts: 7450
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Location: St. Louis, MO

Re: ZOTAC GeForce GT 640 ZONE Edition Fanless GPU

Post by CA_Steve » Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:13 pm

Thanks for the review. I wonder if it's a poor heatsink design or low airflow, or both? The answer in the past has been to strap a low rpm fan to it and see what happens. It'd be a nice followup :D

That said, the 640 is an abortion of a product and it's corrected in the GTX 650 by simply replacing the DDR3 with GDDR5 RAM. Similar power consumption and big bump in fps.
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, Asrock Z97 Anniversary, MSI GTX 1660 Gaming X, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung 860 Evo 500GB, Crucial MX100 256GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic SSR-550FX. 35W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)

whispercat
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:05 pm
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: ZOTAC GeForce GT 640 ZONE Edition Fanless GPU

Post by whispercat » Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:43 pm

Could someone explain how a card can use more power (9w) for idle than it does for playing high def video (4-6w) ? I didn't quite understand that.

Falkon
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 6:59 pm
Location: Canada

Re: ZOTAC GeForce GT 640 ZONE Edition Fanless GPU

Post by Falkon » Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:46 pm

whispercat wrote:Could someone explain how a card can use more power (9w) for idle than it does for playing high def video (4-6w) ? I didn't quite understand that.
The graph I believe you're referring to is labelled "Power Consumption, Increase over Idle (Watts, AC)" at the bottom.

whispercat
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:05 pm
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada

Re: ZOTAC GeForce GT 640 ZONE Edition Fanless GPU

Post by whispercat » Tue Sep 18, 2012 9:39 pm

Falkon wrote:
whispercat wrote:Could someone explain how a card can use more power (9w) for idle than it does for playing high def video (4-6w) ? I didn't quite understand that.
The graph I believe you're referring to is labelled "Power Consumption, Increase over Idle (Watts, AC)" at the bottom.
Thanks, I just misread it, and didn't see the the word "increase" in the graph, nor the word "more" in the article's concluding paragraph. (lol...no wonder it didn't make sense).

Would this card be suitable for somene who wants a little more than integrated graphics, but does not do any gaming?

I work with Adobe CS5 using a Zotac 430 and plan to upgrade to CS6. I am also looking at upgrading my whole rig when Haswell chips come out next year, including a dual monitor set-up. Just not sure whether the onboard intel Haswell GPU would be enough or if I should consider getting something like this Zotac discrete card. I'm really attracted to it's energy efficiency.

edh
Posts: 1618
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: UK

Re: ZOTAC GeForce GT 640 ZONE Edition Fanless GPU

Post by edh » Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:54 am

The GTX650 is only a little more and a whole load better card basically because of the RAM bandwidth. I would think for advanced graphics work memory bandwidth would be an important factor? Hence the 650 would be better.
Raijintek Metis: i5-6400, Scythe Ninja 4, Asus Z170i Pro Gaming, 8Gb RAM, GTX 950, Crucial 250Gb M.2, Seasonic X-400

CA_Steve
Moderator
Posts: 7450
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Location: St. Louis, MO

Re: ZOTAC GeForce GT 640 ZONE Edition Fanless GPU

Post by CA_Steve » Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:26 am

whispercat wrote:Would this card be suitable for somene who wants a little more than integrated graphics, but does not do any gaming?

I work with Adobe CS5 using a Zotac 430 and plan to upgrade to CS6. I am also looking at upgrading my whole rig when Haswell chips come out next year, including a dual monitor set-up. Just not sure whether the onboard intel Haswell GPU would be enough or if I should consider getting something like this Zotac discrete card. I'm really attracted to it's energy efficiency.
CS6 has the Mercury Graphics Engine which uses the GPU to accelerate certain functions using Open-CL and Open-GL. Here's Adobe's FAQ. Haswell is expected to double the GPU processing power of Ivy Bridge...which would put it in in the ballpark of the HD 6570 and GT 640. So, don't buy the GT 640. If you think the IGP is bogging your workflow down, consider getting a more powerful discrete GPU for acceleration.
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, Asrock Z97 Anniversary, MSI GTX 1660 Gaming X, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung 860 Evo 500GB, Crucial MX100 256GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic SSR-550FX. 35W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)

Post Reply