choosing a low power cpu+mb w/ integrated
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
choosing a low power cpu+mb w/ integrated
hi all
i got the bug for wanting an upgrade
i can probably live without it but im just itching for new hardware
i have most of the parts figured out but still on a hunt for a low power cpu+mb w/ integrated gfx
the system is mainly for playing hd video and some downloading of vids (i currently find playing 1080i mpeg2 vid with high cpu usage (~100)
choosen hw
ram: 4 x 2GB
fan: 2 noctua 120mm
usb: 3 (kb/mouse/iphone)
hdd: 2 western digital 2TB (i can probably do 1 if need be)
p/s: picopsu (need to look up what power adapter i have)
current cpu/mb: gigabyte 780g with amd be2300
any idea what cpu/mb will suit my power consumption
thanks
i got the bug for wanting an upgrade
i can probably live without it but im just itching for new hardware
i have most of the parts figured out but still on a hunt for a low power cpu+mb w/ integrated gfx
the system is mainly for playing hd video and some downloading of vids (i currently find playing 1080i mpeg2 vid with high cpu usage (~100)
choosen hw
ram: 4 x 2GB
fan: 2 noctua 120mm
usb: 3 (kb/mouse/iphone)
hdd: 2 western digital 2TB (i can probably do 1 if need be)
p/s: picopsu (need to look up what power adapter i have)
current cpu/mb: gigabyte 780g with amd be2300
any idea what cpu/mb will suit my power consumption
thanks
The op wants to play video and the Atom has a difficult time with Flash video.
The nividia 9300 is going away, likely due to the fact that the 775 cpu is going away. That is too bad as I think that is a good chipset. Handles Linux and has Pure Video, etc. But they are usually considerably more expensive.
I think the 785 would be preferable to the 780. Just newer and might unlock a cpu's cores, if you are into that thing.
I don't know anything about the Intel G31 or G41, but I am considering a G41 for a new Linux build. I don't know if the Intel video compares in quality to Nvidia or AMD. but they run on low wattage and do well with Linux. So I am told.
Clarkdale is going to be about US$300 for the cheapest processor and then another 100 for the board.
If any of this is wrong please let me know for as I stated I am contemplating a build, too.
The nividia 9300 is going away, likely due to the fact that the 775 cpu is going away. That is too bad as I think that is a good chipset. Handles Linux and has Pure Video, etc. But they are usually considerably more expensive.
I think the 785 would be preferable to the 780. Just newer and might unlock a cpu's cores, if you are into that thing.
I don't know anything about the Intel G31 or G41, but I am considering a G41 for a new Linux build. I don't know if the Intel video compares in quality to Nvidia or AMD. but they run on low wattage and do well with Linux. So I am told.
Clarkdale is going to be about US$300 for the cheapest processor and then another 100 for the board.
If any of this is wrong please let me know for as I stated I am contemplating a build, too.
viewtopic.php?p=462885&highlight=#462885
I tested some 720p video playback there with both 780G and HD4670.
I tested some 720p video playback there with both 780G and HD4670.
when playing h264 vids, the hardware acceleration kicks in and the cpu usage is really low.
it is only when playing 1080i mpeg2 vids that i have issues. not sure why this is. im using microsoft's mpeg2 codec that comes with vista, which according to most supports hardware acceleration, though im not really seeing it kick in.
i remember reading about intel G31/G41 uses more power as a motherboard/gfx combo when compared to 780G. and i rarely see people suggesting the intel chipset when asking to build a low power system, usually amd is suggested
it is only when playing 1080i mpeg2 vids that i have issues. not sure why this is. im using microsoft's mpeg2 codec that comes with vista, which according to most supports hardware acceleration, though im not really seeing it kick in.
i remember reading about intel G31/G41 uses more power as a motherboard/gfx combo when compared to 780G. and i rarely see people suggesting the intel chipset when asking to build a low power system, usually amd is suggested
Re: choosing a low power cpu+mb w/ integrated
Exactly.bbzidane wrote:...i can probably live without it ...
Try another decoder. But I think be2300 should be able to play mpeg2 with any decoder.
5050e would be a little better. Buy an Athlon II or Phenom II, if you must and if your MB supports, but the power draw may go up.
<off topic>bbzidane wrote:when playing h264 vids, the hardware acceleration kicks in and the cpu usage is really low.
it is only when playing 1080i mpeg2 vids that i have issues. not sure why this is. im using microsoft's mpeg2 codec that comes with vista, which according to most supports hardware acceleration, though im not really seeing it kick in.
i remember reading about intel G31/G41 uses more power as a motherboard/gfx combo when compared to 780G. and i rarely see people suggesting the intel chipset when asking to build a low power system, usually amd is suggested
If you check out the results from SPCR's motherboard reviews of recent AMD, Intel G35 and Intel G45, you can see that in stock configurations with a low power CPU, Intel is actually a little ahead on power usage.
</off topic>
Anyway, it seems a little strange that the OP is only having problems with playing 1080i back. I've had no problems playing back HD video of any sort with the 4850e and Gigabyte 780G combination in my HTPC or even my underclocked E5200 and G31 general use PC.
I'd try downloading a codec pack first. I've used the klite codec pack (google it) in the past with good results.
Oh, and 4 x 2GB sticks of RAM is excessive for a general use / HD video playing PC. 4GB total would be fine.
You'll have to watch what ampere rating your power brick has - a 5A (=60W) brick wasn't enough to support my 4850e + 780G combo.
I think it's more of a Gigabyte's design issue than a general 785G bug. Nevertheless, I'd still get a 780G board for its lower price and rich features -- features that meet most users' demands. 78xG, coupled with X2 240, will make an energy-efficient, decent performance, and fairly low price platform for video playback and download usage. Just my 2 cents anyway.ghitz wrote:YES I second 780g chipset boards. I just got burned with a Gigabyte 785g motherboard only to find out it needs 8 pin power connector and my Antec Earthwatts 380 does not have such connection...I know there are adapters but it's such a hassle. I'm back to 780g board.Klusu wrote:780G the best
Based on this: http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3615&p=3 , I would go with a 785G board with DDR3 and sideport memory.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 7:15 am
- Location: san diego, Ca.
- Contact:
In defense of 785g I like my MSI 756gm-e65 pretty well. As long as your system doesn't need more then one fan or you are willing to get a fan controller its great. Unlike some other boards this one allows undervolting while still using C'n'Q.
I guess some people with special needs might go with something with integrated wifi or something which might mean 780g. 780g is cheaper as well.
I guess some people with special needs might go with something with integrated wifi or something which might mean 780g. 780g is cheaper as well.