new HD x264 video encoding benchmark

All about them.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
graysky
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: My desk

new HD x264 video encoding benchmark

Post by graysky » Sat Mar 15, 2008 3:03 am

Techarp is hosting a new HD x264 benchmark. Have a look and run it on your system to help populate the data table.

Basically, you run the test encode of an HD sample (1280x720) and it will report back frames-per-second values for your machine @ it's clock/overclock level. You can run it at your stock settings and at your overclock settings to see how your machine compares to others in the database.

My goal is to have a representative set of data for many different chips and chipsets. Please just report your results here in this thread. I will keep the data at that url to keep things simple.

Thanks all and enjoy!

The following image will be updated automatically as new data comes in. It doesn't display any results, but it does show the number of data points collected so far and how they break down by CPU type:

Image
Last edited by graysky on Tue Mar 18, 2008 12:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
AuraAllan
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 713
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:49 am
Location: Denmark

Post by AuraAllan » Sat Mar 15, 2008 3:57 am

Done :)

E4500 (stock 11*200)
G33 chipset
2GB DDR2 RAM @ 400MHz 4-4-4-12
Win XP pro SP2 (build 2600)

Code: Select all

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 24.22 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 24.14 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 24.24 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 24.22 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.16 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.18 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.18 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.16 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
Let me know if you want more info.
I'd rather go synchronize swimming with Angela Lansbury
Top
thejamppa
Posts: 3142
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:20 am
Location: Missing in Finnish wilderness, howling to moon with wolf brethren and walking with brother bears
Contact:
Contact thejamppa

Post by thejamppa » Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:12 am

AMD X2 4000+
Core Speed: 2100,4 Mhz
Multiplier: 10,5x
Buss Speed: 200 Mhz
HyperTransport: 1000 Mhz

Chipset: Ati: RS690

Memory: DDR2 2 x 1 GB
Frequency: 200.0 Mhz
Clocks: 5-5-5-15
XP Pro SP2

Code: Select all


---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 21.14 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 21.23 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 21.24 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 21.26 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.81 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.83 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.81 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.82 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
If seeing is believing, how can blind person believe in anything?
Maturity is just not experience in life but also ability to make compromises.
Top
graysky
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: My desk

Post by graysky » Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:24 am

Thanks for the data, guys, will update the tables shortly with your results.

@thejamppa - is your 4000+ a Clawhammer (130 nm) or San Diego (90 nm). If you're unsure, CPU-Z will tell you on the first tab.
Top
Mikael
Posts: 206
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:12 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Post by Mikael » Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:49 am

graysky wrote:@thejamppa - is your 4000+ a Clawhammer (130 nm) or San Diego (90 nm). If you're unsure, CPU-Z will tell you on the first tab.
I can answer for him: It's a 65nm Brisbane core, as it has a 10.5 multiplier.
Top
thejamppa
Posts: 3142
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:20 am
Location: Missing in Finnish wilderness, howling to moon with wolf brethren and walking with brother bears
Contact:
Contact thejamppa

Post by thejamppa » Sat Mar 15, 2008 5:56 am

Mikael wrote:
graysky wrote:@thejamppa - is your 4000+ a Clawhammer (130 nm) or San Diego (90 nm). If you're unsure, CPU-Z will tell you on the first tab.
I can answer for him: It's a 65nm Brisbane core, as it has a 10.5 multiplier.
Exactly, its Brisbane. Thanks Mikael ^^
If seeing is believing, how can blind person believe in anything?
Maturity is just not experience in life but also ability to make compromises.
Top
graysky
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: My desk

Post by graysky » Sat Mar 15, 2008 6:09 am

Cool, got it!
Top
xit2050
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 3:45 am
Location: Belgium

Post by xit2050 » Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:06 am

E8400 (@3.6GHz, 9*400)
P35 chipset
2GB DDR2, 5-5-5-15 @ 400MHz
XP pro SP x32

Code: Select all

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 39.92 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 40.21 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 40.23 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 40.23 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 10.58 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 10.57 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 10.59 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 10.59 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
Top
toki_c
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:27 pm
Location: Earth

Post by toki_c » Sun Mar 16, 2008 2:16 pm

here are some results with E4300, IP35Pro, 4GB DDR2-800, vista x64:

2.4GHz(267x9)-890MHz-4-4-4-12-tRD4: average: 25.7675fps, 6.48fps

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.42 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.89 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.87 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.89 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.50 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.50 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.43 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.49 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

2.4GHz-890MHz-4-4-4-12-tRD6: average: 25.7675, 6.4675

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.51 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.94 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.86 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.76 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.49 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.43 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.44 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.51 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

2.4GHz-890MHz-5-5-5-15-tRD4: average: 25.5625, 6.4375

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.56 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.59 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.61 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.49 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.46 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.43 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.44 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.42 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

2.4GHz-1068MHz-5-5-5-15-tRD6: average: 25.8445, 6.50

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.69 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.97 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.90 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 25.82 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.51 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.50 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.48 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 6.51 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

2.8GHz(9x312)-936MHz-4-4-4-12-tRD4: average: 29.675, 7.5175

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 29.68 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 29.81 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 29.36 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 29.85 fps, 3905.08 kb/s
---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 7.55 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 7.46 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 7.50 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 7.56 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

I'm pretty confused, surprised with the effect of tRD. It seems that the RAM frequency has an important impact than the DDR2 latendies and tRD (MCH) latency is the last... It seems i would keep 2.8-3.0GHz 1066MHz-5-5-5-15-tRD4-5.
[size=75]Sonta 3 - 425W Pro82+, 3x120mm Noctua S12 fans @6-6.5V, NH-U12F, Abit IP35Pro, Zotac 8800GT512 AMP! Edition 700/1700/2000-Accelero-S1-Rev.2, E4300 @2.43GHz, 4x1GB G.Skill 6400CL4PK @810MHz-1.8V-tRD6, Vista x64 + XP 32bit on 2x750GB WD GP, Club3D Theadron 7.1DTS - CMI8788, Logitech Z5400, Plextor PX-760A, Dell 2007WFP-IPS, MX518, SpeedLink Al-Flat Keyboard[/size]
Top
graysky
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: My desk

Post by graysky » Sun Mar 16, 2008 3:25 pm

Wow dude, you tested the hell outta that system. Thanks for the data.
Top
Silviu
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:11 pm
Location: Romania

Post by Silviu » Sun Mar 16, 2008 11:57 pm

Cpu: E6750 ( 2.66 GHz 8*333 stock )
Mobo: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3 P35 Chipset
Ram: Corsair 2 GB DDR2 400 5-5-5-18
OS: Vista Ultimate X86

Code: Select all

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 29.94 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 29.91 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 29.91 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 29.89 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 7.57 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 7.57 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 7.58 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 7.56 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
[b]Main Rig:[/b] Intel Core i7 860 2.80GHz / Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4 / 2x Corsair 4GB DDR3 1333MHz CL9 XMS3 PC3-10600 Dual Channel Kit ( 8 GB ) / Gigabyte GTX 460 OC 1 GB / Corsair CMPSU-650HX Modular / Kingston 40GB SATA-II V+Western Digital 320GB SATA-II AAKS / Samsung T240 / Antec P182 / Logitech X-540 / Windows 7 Ultimate x64
[b]Laptop:[/b] Toshiba Tecra A10-11J / Windows 7 Professional x64
Top
JimX
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 428
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Greece

Post by JimX » Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:27 am

XP Pro
P35 (IP35 Pro)
E6750 8x376=3008MHz
RAM 4GB 5-5-5-15 @376 1:1

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.19 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.90 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.90 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.81 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.34 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.33 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.35 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.32 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
Top
graysky
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: My desk

Post by graysky » Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:16 am

@Silviu and JimX - thanks for the data. Will update shortly.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “CPUs and Motherboards”