E7200 available at Newegg

All about them.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
fwki
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 120
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:06 am
Location: Houston, Texas U.S.A.

E7200 available at Newegg

Post by fwki » Thu May 01, 2008 7:17 am

Only $139...not too shabby.

Who's gonna be first to post some numbers?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6819115052

amyhughes
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:10 am
Location: USA

Post by amyhughes » Thu May 01, 2008 9:06 am

I wish there was something interesting to put it into. I'd like to see a budget board with decent onboard graphics with low power requirements in an LGA 775 flavor. Something like a 780G or GeForce 8200 integrated graphics.

If I understand correctly, a recent, modest card like an HD 2400 Pro or GeForce 8400GS has higher power requirements than the similar-spec 780G or GeForce 8200 integrated graphics. Right? To make matters worse, 775 motherboards without onboard graphics at all, into which you'd place one of these modest video cards, don't seem to come in microATX flavor.

In short, it's cheaper, simpler and more elegant to build a low-power computer with decent graphics using an AMD board. Or am I missing something?

yuu
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 5:03 pm
Location: eu

Post by yuu » Thu May 01, 2008 9:26 am

say no further, i consider putting together dp31 or future dg43,45,41, and 7200 intel's own crowd, bsel 333 modded for 3150mhz, and hope voltage is enough. beacuse the motherboard is not oc friendly. i'm not worried about idle power because this cpu runs cool, it will not cool more than 5watts idle if undervolted, no point either. an when loaded it will get all it can take from 3Ghz cpu, that's plenty and superior.

fwki
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 120
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:06 am
Location: Houston, Texas U.S.A.

Post by fwki » Thu May 01, 2008 9:54 am

amyhughes wrote:I wish there was something interesting to put it into. I'd like to see a budget board with decent onboard graphics with low power requirements in an LGA 775 flavor.
See this: http://www.digitimes.com/mobos/a20080424PD213.html

and this: http://channel.hexus.net/content/item.p ... ly%20creek

Fly Creek is based on the G45 chipset, with DVI+HDMI, 1x PCI-E , 8.1 sound, digital out...."expected to make an appearance at the end of Q2 this year...Intel expects them to cost in the $100-$150 range to distribution."

Erssa
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2005 9:26 pm
Location: Finland

Post by Erssa » Thu May 01, 2008 11:43 am

"Our sources have told us that the Intel G45 is suffering growing pains. The current revision is locked at a 667MHz GPU core speed and the VC1/H.264 decoder capabilities are turned off. A new revision will be available in July with the 800MHz GPU core speed and VC1/H.264 decoder capabilities turned on. In essence, the first chipsets (if they are available) will be nothing more than a G35+. We will update this information as we receive additional i
information." - source
amyhughes wrote:In short, it's cheaper, simpler and more elegant to build a low-power computer with decent graphics using an AMD board. Or am I missing something?
It depends what you want, but in short, yes. AMD has superior platform atm, especially when it comes to hardware decoding. But frankly Intel doesn't need that hardware support as much, because their processors are so much faster.

Of course there are motherboards like Asus P5N-EM HDMI for Intel platform. It comes with a GeForce 7100 / nForce 630i chipset, but nForce 630i has no nVidia PureVideo support.

Once G45s with competitive decoding capabilities are released in Q3 or later, Intel will be more competitive in this department. But AMD will still be cheaper and more elegant.

andyb
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Essex, England

Post by andyb » Thu May 01, 2008 2:27 pm

I have one, see below.

viewtopic.php?p=410470#410470


Andy

Post Reply