Mushkin ATX12V 550W Power Supply
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee, Devonavar
Mushkin ATX12V 550W Power Supply
85 USA bucks with a modular cable system and SLI support. Has anyone tried it?
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:45 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
- Contact:
Re: Mushkin ATX12V 550W Power Supply
Made by Topower, so you can search for Topower tests (OCZ ModStream and PowerStream, Topower itself and so on).Arturo wrote:85 USA bucks with a modular cable system and SLI support. Has anyone tried it?
BTW, I've tested Mushkin XP-650. Very good voltage stabilization (independent stabilization on +12V, +5V and +3,3V rails using mag-amps), good build quality, average quietness (two 80 mm fans, speed from 1800 to 2600 rpm depending on output load). Cables are way too rigid (2 isolating layers and shielding), it may be hard to place them in a small PC cases. Detailed review will be ready in a month or so (xbitlabs.com)...
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:45 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12285
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Standards have risen. Our sample was ~74% at 150W, which is poor in comparison to most of the recommended PSUs SPCR has reviewed in the past 1.5-2 years. Also, the 36 dBA @ 1m default is simply unacceptable, especially when the price is ~$200.jaganath wrote:Wow, it used to be that PSU's with ~80% efficiency at 150W+ were considered pretty stellar, and now they are the dog's breakfast? How times change....
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:45 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
- Contact:
Recommended efficiency for the ATX12V 2.2 power supply is 75% at light load (20% of full load or 130W for the 650W PSU), 80% at typical load (50%) and 77% at full load. As you can see, XP-650 doesn't comply with this.jaganath wrote:Wow, it used to be that PSU's with ~80% efficiency at 150W+ were considered pretty stellar, and now they are the dog's breakfast? How times change....
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 11:29 pm
Yeah well, the purpose of a company is making money, and selling product that lots of people want is a good way to do that. Right now many people want a 600W+ PSU, so that's what they sell. Now if you sell bad products you might not be in business for too long, but that's another thing altogheter.
I have no idea what Mushkin was thinking about with this one though, ToPower is capable of making good PSUs, they make PSUs to order with pretty much any feature and fan configuration you want, and some manufacturers order better configs than others.. Now having no PFC or passive PFC and effienecy this low causing way too much heat and that way a need for fast fans is unacceptabel for a PSU this expensive.. Im really looking forward t the be quiet PSU reviews by SPCR to see how they work, according to reviews and my experience with three samples they are very quiet and work great. All have been based on ToPowers most recent designs at time of purchase, this Mushkin is clearly not, or then it's based on some experiment gone bad..
I have no idea what Mushkin was thinking about with this one though, ToPower is capable of making good PSUs, they make PSUs to order with pretty much any feature and fan configuration you want, and some manufacturers order better configs than others.. Now having no PFC or passive PFC and effienecy this low causing way too much heat and that way a need for fast fans is unacceptabel for a PSU this expensive.. Im really looking forward t the be quiet PSU reviews by SPCR to see how they work, according to reviews and my experience with three samples they are very quiet and work great. All have been based on ToPowers most recent designs at time of purchase, this Mushkin is clearly not, or then it's based on some experiment gone bad..
http://www.jonnyguru.com/PSU/HP-550/
This psu looks to be junk. Here are some "highlights" from the review-
"Just when you thought it could get worse... the crossload tests cometh! With a 3A load on the 3.3V rail and a 4A load on the 5V rail and 14A on each 12V rail (all within specification) the 12V dropped to 11.24V! It took taking the 3.3V up to 5A and the 5V up to 8A to get the 12V rail back up to 11.40V."
"The crossload shows that a computer with a minimal load on the 3.3V and/or 5V rails is going to wreak havoc on the 12V rails and the excessive ripple on the 12V line makes me contemplate potential long term effects on peripherals."
LOL
Based on this review, the spec sheet they sent over to Topower was-
"Well, we need a 550 watter....so Must put out 550 watts."
"Must be modular."
"Must be extremely stable on 3.3v."
"Oh, and lets give it a pretty little green lighting scheme..."
Maybe they trusted thier Topower sales rep a little too much to take care of the rest...
As a buyer, seeing a product like this seems to indicate a limited knowledge real world PSU requirements; and a high level of ignorance about what's really going on with psu's and enthusiasts these days. Like nici said, everyone wants a 600w psu these days and maybe that's the only trumpet loud enough for the folks at Mushkin to hear when it comes to selling points...which is really sad considering they market thier ram to enthusiasts, who generally do thier research before buying.
Well, maybe they are marketing to the idiots out there who buy video cards based solely on how much ram they have...
Also, If I'm not mistaken, the 2 psu's discussed in this thread are thier first foray into the PSU world. Nice. They should know better.
This psu looks to be junk. Here are some "highlights" from the review-
"Just when you thought it could get worse... the crossload tests cometh! With a 3A load on the 3.3V rail and a 4A load on the 5V rail and 14A on each 12V rail (all within specification) the 12V dropped to 11.24V! It took taking the 3.3V up to 5A and the 5V up to 8A to get the 12V rail back up to 11.40V."
"The crossload shows that a computer with a minimal load on the 3.3V and/or 5V rails is going to wreak havoc on the 12V rails and the excessive ripple on the 12V line makes me contemplate potential long term effects on peripherals."
LOL
Based on this review, the spec sheet they sent over to Topower was-
"Well, we need a 550 watter....so Must put out 550 watts."
"Must be modular."
"Must be extremely stable on 3.3v."
"Oh, and lets give it a pretty little green lighting scheme..."
Maybe they trusted thier Topower sales rep a little too much to take care of the rest...
As a buyer, seeing a product like this seems to indicate a limited knowledge real world PSU requirements; and a high level of ignorance about what's really going on with psu's and enthusiasts these days. Like nici said, everyone wants a 600w psu these days and maybe that's the only trumpet loud enough for the folks at Mushkin to hear when it comes to selling points...which is really sad considering they market thier ram to enthusiasts, who generally do thier research before buying.
Well, maybe they are marketing to the idiots out there who buy video cards based solely on how much ram they have...
Also, If I'm not mistaken, the 2 psu's discussed in this thread are thier first foray into the PSU world. Nice. They should know better.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 3:51 pm
- Location: Eastend, SK, Canada
Rail Fusion bothers me - from what I have been able to determine, Topower just omitted independant protection for each 12v and is pretty much selling that as a "feature." The rails are still virtually split, but with no independant protection there's no real point to having them be split at all.larrymoencurly wrote:What the heck is Mushkin's "Rail Fusion", and how does it differ from simply having a single rail?
Last edited by Oklahoma Wolf on Fri Aug 11, 2006 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:45 am
- Location: Moscow, Russia
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 3:51 pm
- Location: Eastend, SK, Canada
I'd tend to agree with you, just on the grounds that I slightly prefer Seasonic build quality to that of FSP these days. Not that the FSP Epsilons are that bad a design, I just like to see Chemicon caps on a PSU's secondary rather than the mixed bag of Capxon and OST caps I found in my FSP 600W.merlin wrote:Heck I'd say corsair would beat ocz too as their psus tend to be rather inefficient also.
Now the old FSP550-60PLG... that was/is a good design. I was actually hoping FSP would take that design and update it and make it more efficient to use in their high end units, but they seem to have tossed all their R&D money into the Epsilon design. Love what they did in the Zen though... they could put a fan on that one, get 500W out of it, and I'd be interested