Laptop HDD vs SSD?

Silencing hard drives, optical drives and other storage devices

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
johnno
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:01 am
Location: CYBERSPACE

Laptop HDD vs SSD?

Post by johnno » Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:10 am

Hi all,

I'm upgrading a sort-of embedded device of mine (a NAS) with a larger boot partition so I can mess about with alternate OS'es and such.

Up till now, i'd assumed I was going to replace the current 256MB DOM with a smallish 2.5" SSD (say 8 GB).
(The CPU is cooled by the case fans [via ducting], and the case contains 4 hot 3.5" HDD's, so I don't want to add much more heat to the case than as designed for).

Anyways, the recent Tom's Hardware article claiming that SSD's use more power than laptop HDD's got me thinking... (let's assume that the article isn't off by more than an order of magnitude either way)
Is it pointless to get a SSD at 2x the cost of a much larger HDD, if i'm only going to be saving a watt or so, if that?

What do you guys think?

Vicotnik
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 1831
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:53 am
Location: Sweden

Post by Vicotnik » Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:38 pm

Tom is full of shit as always..

viewtopic.php?t=48918

suzyj
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 9:38 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by suzyj » Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:31 pm

Vicotnik wrote:Tom is full of shit as always..

viewtopic.php?t=48918
The testing methodology is clearly broken, but even so, a couple of these SSDs appear to have really revolting idle power use of up to 2W.

That's going to result in dreadful battery use, even if you're not using the machine at all.

andyb
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Essex, England

Post by andyb » Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:01 pm

I pointed out that Toms review was seriously wrong because of the methodology, they were really "using the HDD/SDD's" which wont be the case in a server environment at all, so whatever uses the least amount of power when doing nothing wins.

The answer should ideally be nothing as the drive/SSD would go to sleep, this is not that effective within windows, but I understand can be 100% effective within Linux as all logging can be turned off, and everything that does not actually read from the drive at boot up time is run through RAM so the drive stays asleep.

As the machine you are talking about is a NAS box, you can easily get away with a bootable CF (compact flash) card and an adaptor (you need a PATA channel available).

They (as far as I know) use hardly any power, are dirt cheap, are very small, and dont need any cooling.

Various people on SPCR do/did use CF cards for this /similar kinds of purposes, have a look afound the forums for more info.


Andy

Post Reply