WD Scorpio Blue WD5000BEVT Review

Silencing hard drives, optical drives and other storage devices

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
QuietOC
Posts: 1407
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:08 pm
Location: Michigan
Contact:

WD Scorpio Blue WD5000BEVT Review

Post by QuietOC » Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:42 pm

Tomshardware

Image
Image

I nearly bought this 2 platter 5400rpm drive, but instead got a deal on an open box 7200rpm WD Scorpio Black WD3200BEKT. The big Blue doesn't seem too far from the smaller Black's performance. Too bad they didn't include the 500GB Seagate 5400.6 in the test.

josephclemente
Posts: 580
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: USA (Phoenix, AZ)

Post by josephclemente » Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:48 pm

I picked up one of these drives for my laptop, it does perform nicely and is very quiet.

line
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:07 pm
Location: Israel

Post by line » Tue Jan 06, 2009 6:57 pm

Here are the absolute numbers. The new Scorpio leads the way in power efficiency.

Image

Image

The low-power idle number doesn't make sense though. I wouldn't expect it to be higher than active idle. At most it should be equal, indicating the feature is not implemented, or for some reason hasn't kicked in. Maybe there was an error with this particular reading.

QuietOC
Posts: 1407
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:08 pm
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Post by QuietOC » Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:00 am

line wrote:Here are the absolute numbers. The new Scorpio leads the way in power efficiency.
I am pretty certain the Seagate 5400.6 uses even less power, but it also seems to have much slower latency--so it probably has lower performance/Watt. However, the old 320GB 5400.5 isn't too far from the new Scorpio Blue either.

line
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:07 pm
Location: Israel

Post by line » Wed Jan 07, 2009 12:04 pm

I'm curious to see how the Hitachi 5K500.B compares too.

Post Reply