Intel X25-V G2 40GB SSD

Silencing hard drives, optical drives and other storage devices

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Eunos
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 378
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:29 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Intel X25-V G2 40GB SSD

Post by Eunos » Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:33 pm

Image

Launched very quietly, the smaller G2 supports TRIM unlike the Kingston equivalent, but appears to have slightly slower writes. Reads remain 170 MB/s. Price is around $130 or $125 at Newegg or Mwave respectively.

Dailytech link

Manufacturer's link

Newegg

adikt
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by adikt » Tue Jan 05, 2010 6:11 pm

SSDs just keep looking more affordable. I was seriously considering the Kingston 40GB drive, because it's $20-$30 cheaper but I've been waiting for TRIM support through a firmware upgrade (which sounds it could come along even sooner thanks to competition from this).

DAve_M
Posts: 198
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:58 am
Location: UK

Post by DAve_M » Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:19 am

It is not so much competition as it is an identical drive. Firmware has to come from Kingston though. You can't flash it with X-25V firmware.

adikt
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by adikt » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:14 pm

Hmm, I know it's identical, but the competition comes from only being slightly more expensive (you can find the kingston drive cheaper - even on amazon) and supporting TRIM. I'm trying to find now any retailers that stock the SSD and also ship to Australia.

adikt
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by adikt » Wed Jan 06, 2010 3:41 pm

DAve_M wrote:Firmware has to come from Kingston though. You can't flash it with X-25V firmware.
Are you sure about this?

SilentMig
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 10:46 am
Location: London, Ontario, Canada

Post by SilentMig » Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:54 pm

filler post

[Edit: Just posted this because when I was going to post the post that I made below, it said I needed 3 posts before I could include URLs in a post, so hence this post..]
Last edited by SilentMig on Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

SilentMig
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 10:46 am
Location: London, Ontario, Canada

Post by SilentMig » Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:54 pm

http://www.kingston.com/support/ssdnow/m_firmware.asp
Solid-State Drives
SSDNow M-Series Part Number: SNM125-S2/xxGB Firmware update

Description:
The URL below will redirect you to the Intel website where you will download the X25-M Solid-State Drive Firmware update. Prior to running the update, review the update instructions for a successful user experience.


http://www.intel.com/support/ssdc/index_update.htm

Please note:
This firmware update is not hosted by Kingston!
Kingston is not responsible for damages or data loss arising from the download and/or installation of the SSD firmware.
I'm looking into this exact issue right now trying to find out for the Kingston SSDNow 80 GB version and the page on Kingston's site under support for these drives seems to say you get the firmware from Intel. Just Googling around now trying to confirm if that's worked successfully for people because I would've got an Intel 80 GB drive but they're out of stock where I want to buy it/pricematch it and apparently the Kingston SSDNow M series (and E series, correspondingly with Intel) are -exactly- the same drives as the Intel ones just rebranded, some sort of licensing I guess.


Edit: Hmm, sorry, I guess I forgot the 40 GB version is the "V" (value) series not considered an M series, as my link was for, and from what I can see there doesn't seem to be any driver support for that right now.

Here is the link to just the Kingston SSD products support page -

http://www.kingston.com/support/ssdnow/default.asp

dhanson865
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
Location: TN, USA

Post by dhanson865 » Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:08 pm

The Kingston 40Gb is not an M series drive it is a V series.

snv125-s2/40gb (kit)
snv125/40gb (drive only)

You got me with the Ninja Edit. :P
.
Please put a country in your profile if you haven't already.
This site is international but I'll assume you are in the US if you don't tell me otherwise.
RAID levels thread http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=388987

SilentMig
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 10:46 am
Location: London, Ontario, Canada

Post by SilentMig » Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:12 pm

http://newsblaze.com/story/201001060808 ... story.html

Seems this drive is coming with TRIM support built in though sometime soon I guess.

And ah, yes dh I'm quick like that (except when I'm not.. of course).

ThAz
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 12:59 pm
Location: Finland

Post by ThAz » Thu Jan 07, 2010 8:26 am

A guy at www.sweclockers.com have done some testing on a x25-v

Image

Image

Link to thread (Swedish):
http://www.sweclockers.com/forum/showth ... did=901793

So it seems pretty good, i have one on order :)

bgiddins
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:04 am
Location: Australia

Post by bgiddins » Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:48 pm

Apparently the Kingston version of this drive is no more - Intel stopped shipping them to Kingston, cutting them off. So anyone wanting a 40GB SSD, get the Intel one, unless you don't mind a possible inability to provide support by Kingston.
[size=75][b]Server:[/b] Antec 300|Corsair VX450|Intel Q9550 E0|Asus P5Q-VM|8GB Kingston DDR2-800|Xigmatek HDT-S1283|1xWD3000GLFS|4xWD10EADS[/size]

adikt
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by adikt » Fri Jan 15, 2010 7:43 am

Yeah I have the kingston 40gb drive, and as my first SSD, I'm loving it. It's a shame about TRIM, but I don't mind the write speeds considering the majority of what I use the drive for is read orientated. It cost me $130 AUD all up to buy it from amazon, which is about $50 cheaper and two weeks ealier than the Intel drives.

CA_Steve
Moderator
Posts: 7450
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Location: St. Louis, MO

Post by CA_Steve » Fri Jan 15, 2010 7:58 am

Kingston announceda 30GB version at a lower price point when the Intel 40GB was announced.
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, Asrock Z97 Anniversary, MSI GTX 1660 Gaming X, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung 860 Evo 500GB, Crucial MX100 256GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic SSR-550FX. 35W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)

Eunos
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 378
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:29 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by Eunos » Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:01 pm

This is an interesting development, as the 30G Kingston supports TRIM and is well-priced at $80-after-rebate. Performance will still be snappy (180MB/sec. read, 50MB/sec. write). Some effort is required to run Windows 7 on a drive of this size, but it is at least possible.

However, the former TRIM-less Kingston 40G, at $85-after-rebate, would have been great value too. In reality, it was barely available in stock for that price, despite being heavily promoted. Currently Newegg has it for $130 USD.

I hope this sort of price-gouging does not continue, as these products have the potential to bring SSDs to the average PC enthusiast at last.

Tom's Hardware Link

CA_Steve
Moderator
Posts: 7450
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Location: St. Louis, MO

Post by CA_Steve » Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:36 pm

I think 2010 is going to be the year of the SSD. New generation of controllers + higher density RAM in smaller processes by more mfgrs = lower prices for more mainstream PCs/users.
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, Asrock Z97 Anniversary, MSI GTX 1660 Gaming X, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung 860 Evo 500GB, Crucial MX100 256GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic SSR-550FX. 35W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)

Jordan
Posts: 557
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 8:21 pm
Location: Scotland, UK

Post by Jordan » Tue Jan 19, 2010 12:58 pm

Hope to see a review for this soon!
CPU & HS: i5 2500K | Noctua NH-U12 - fanless
Case & PSU: Antec Solo II | Seasonic 460W Fanless
Components:16GB Corsair Vengeance PC3-15000 | Gigabyte Z68 | Sapphire Ultimate HD7750 | 1.5TB SSD storage
Cooling: Nexus RS 120mm controlled by mobo (very low RPM)
External Storage: HP N40L WHS2011 - 2x3TB WD Red

Iron_Dreamer
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:43 pm

Post by Iron_Dreamer » Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:49 pm

Eunos wrote:Some effort is required to run Windows 7 on a drive of this size, but it is at least possible.
I really don't think it requires effort to run Win7 on a 30GB drive. I have one system running Win7 off a 16GB CF card. Installed, with page file and hibernation files turned off, Win7 x64 is only about 8-9GB.

Shoot, even with Office Professional 2007, Adobe CS4 Design Premium, and some other miscellaneous software installed, I still have over 10GB free on my laptop's 30GB OCZ Vertex.

Perhaps all the "effort" that is required is not installing every game and app under the sun on one's 30GB SSD.

adikt
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by adikt » Tue Feb 02, 2010 4:58 pm

Firmware updates are now possible on the Kingston-rebradge of this drive:
http://www.overclock.net/ssd/656984-how ... b-ssd.html

Done it myself and it's working great, you can even get the Intel SSD toolbox working: http://www.overclock.net/ssd/660723-usi ... intel.html

corrion
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:47 pm
Location: CA

Post by corrion » Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:16 pm

adikt wrote:Firmware updates are now possible on the Kingston-rebradge of this drive:
http://www.overclock.net/ssd/656984-how ... b-ssd.html

Done it myself and it's working great, you can even get the Intel SSD toolbox working: http://www.overclock.net/ssd/660723-usi ... intel.html
Interesting... I have the Kingston drive myself, so this piques my interest. Does that mean after I go through these steps, in the future I am able to use Intel's firmware updates instead of Kingston's, or is this a one-time-only deal?

adikt
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by adikt » Tue Feb 02, 2010 10:12 pm

I'm not sure about future updates - not sure what another firmware update could provide as the drive seems completely functional already.

Oh and by the way, Kingston will not be releasing their own firmware updates for this drive.

corrion
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:47 pm
Location: CA

Post by corrion » Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:09 am

Thanks for the heads up! I just flashed the drive tonight, and the drive has TRIM now!

dhanson865
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
Location: TN, USA

Post by dhanson865 » Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:45 pm

I went ahead and did it on two drives here at work.

This is easier to do from the cover your bases sense if you bought the version of the drive that comes with Acronis Trueimage so you can backup the drive before you risk anything with an unsupported firmware update.

Both drives I updated did so without losing data but I sure wouldn't bet on that.

Backup before you do it, it's scary enough thinking about bricking a drive without having to worry about losing data.

FWIW one drive says it has had 225GB written to it and the wear indication says 99% left.

The second drive says it has had 8GB written to it and also 99% remaining.

The third drive is on a server with system management (SMB) so the only way I can check that drive is to down the server hand pull the drive. Intel SSD toolbox, Crystal Disk Info, HDtune, etc are useless on server grade hardware.
.
Please put a country in your profile if you haven't already.
This site is international but I'll assume you are in the US if you don't tell me otherwise.
RAID levels thread http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=388987

adikt
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:53 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by adikt » Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:58 pm

dhanson865 wrote:FWIW one drive says it has had 225GB written to it and the wear indication says 99% left.

The second drive says it has had 8GB written to it and also 99% remaining.
Hey where did you find this information? I backed up my drive too before the firmware upgrade but thankfully didn't need to use it.

EDIT: I just found it in the SMART information. My drive has had 138.56 GB written to it with 99% on the wearout media indicator.

dhanson865
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
Location: TN, USA

Post by dhanson865 » Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:44 pm

I'd also mention on the cost issue the Kingston SSD kit with Acronis, drive rail kit, and molex to sata power adapter is still $20 less after S&H according to the search I just did on the spcr pricegrabber.

Before today I thought maybe the trim made it worth paying extra but now that I've turned trim support on my attitude has taken a 180 and I'm thinking its better to get the cheaper drive and take the 15 mins to take care of trim...
.
Please put a country in your profile if you haven't already.
This site is international but I'll assume you are in the US if you don't tell me otherwise.
RAID levels thread http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=388987

corrion
Posts: 50
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:47 pm
Location: CA

Post by corrion » Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:07 pm

It's just all depends. I snagged the 40GB Kingston drive for $95 after shipping and tax, so it was definitely more worth it for me than paying Intel's $130.

maalitehdas
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 12:04 am
Location: Finland

Post by maalitehdas » Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:32 pm

From the high end department:
512Gb ExpressCARD SSD Flash, sold here in Finland for 8837.90 €
http://www.ocztechnology.com/products/s ... xpress_ssd

That 40Gb Intel is sold with 105 € here.

_MarcoM_
Posts: 294
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:58 am

Post by _MarcoM_ » Thu Feb 04, 2010 6:15 am

What's the formatted capacity of the X25-V? Is it lower than 40GB?

maalitehdas
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 12:04 am
Location: Finland

Post by maalitehdas » Thu Feb 04, 2010 9:38 am

Most of them loose 5% after formatting, i suppose that's quite close to it again. Not seen thou.

dhanson865
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
Location: TN, USA

Post by dhanson865 » Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:12 am

_MarcoM_ wrote:What's the formatted capacity of the X25-V? Is it lower than 40GB?
Disk Management shows a 40GB SSD as 37.25GB. I formatted mine at just over 25GB but you could get the full 37GB if you care about the capacity.

Just remember SSDs just as hard drives get slower if they are full. The reasons why differ drastically but the rule of thumb is you don't want a full drive no matter if it is a rotating disk or a SSD.

http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdo ... i=3702&p=5 gives you some thoughts on "overprovisioning"

http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdo ... i=3667&p=3 discusses free space effecting speed on Trim enabled drives:
Performance in a TRIM enabled system is now determined not by the number of invalid blocks on your SSD, but rather the amount of free space you have. I went into a deep explanation of the relationship between free space and the performance of some SSDs here.

TRIM will make sure that you don’t have to worry about your drive filling up with invalid data, but it doesn’t skirt the bigger issue: dynamic controllers see their performance improve with more free space.

My rule of thumb is to keep at least 20% free space on your drive, you can get by with less but performance tends to suffer. It doesn’t degrade by the same amount for all drives either. Some controllers are more opportunistic with free space (e.g. Intel), while others don’t seem to rely as much on free space for improved performance.
presumably this issue is even worse if you don't use Trim (say an XP machine on the Kingston drive without using the Intel toolkit).
.
Please put a country in your profile if you haven't already.
This site is international but I'll assume you are in the US if you don't tell me otherwise.
RAID levels thread http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=388987

dhanson865
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
Location: TN, USA

Post by dhanson865 » Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:21 am

maalitehdas wrote:Most of them loose 5% after formatting, i suppose that's quite close to it again. Not seen thou.
Make that 7% and it's pretty close when talking about GB drives.

Move that up to 10% when talking about TB drives.

And both of those percentages are just the conversion from decimal to binary. No formatting overhead involved.

Marketing types just don't understand or care about math.
.
Please put a country in your profile if you haven't already.
This site is international but I'll assume you are in the US if you don't tell me otherwise.
RAID levels thread http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=388987

Post Reply