Thermalright Ultra 120 +
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
Hi, I saw that article earlier and it's interesting that more heatpipes make it work better. I guess that more heatpipes transfer the heat to the cooling fins better so the CPU is cooler for a given fin temperature. Certainly makes me wonder about my Zalman 9500 with only 3 heatpipes and very cool fins
Don't forget they used a 1600rpm 120mm fan, generally SPCR fans would be looking as 600 ~ 1000rpm fan speed. As ultimate silent cooler I'm not sure if 6 pipes will help, at the low fan speeds we'd run it may well be that the 4 pipe can move the heat well enough that 6 won't really help and they provide a little more obstruction between the fins. I think the Ninja is still the best bet for very low air flow cooling, it too has 6 heatpipes.
Seb
Don't forget they used a 1600rpm 120mm fan, generally SPCR fans would be looking as 600 ~ 1000rpm fan speed. As ultimate silent cooler I'm not sure if 6 pipes will help, at the low fan speeds we'd run it may well be that the 4 pipe can move the heat well enough that 6 won't really help and they provide a little more obstruction between the fins. I think the Ninja is still the best bet for very low air flow cooling, it too has 6 heatpipes.
Seb
-
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:55 am
- Location: EU
-
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:06 am
- Location: Klamath Falls, OR
12. The Ninja has twelve heatpipes conveying heat from the CPU block to the cooling fins. For manufacturing efficiency, there are 6 actual pipes with the CPU block in the middle, but there are still 12, repeat, 12 pipes conveying heat away from the CPU block.SebRad wrote:I think the Ninja is still the best bet for very low air flow cooling, it too has 6 heatpipes.
-
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:55 am
- Location: EU
The new Ultra 120 Extreme has 12 heat paths made out of 6 heatpipes, too.
I expect the new U120E to be better than the Ninja as all of its heapipes are located above the copper base, while the Ninja has them laid out on two different levels. Of course with all the usual caveats about very low airflow situations.
I expect the new U120E to be better than the Ninja as all of its heapipes are located above the copper base, while the Ninja has them laid out on two different levels. Of course with all the usual caveats about very low airflow situations.
First, a note for anybody else that may be wondering where the rest of the review is:
Several of the pages had no "next page" button at the bottom (at least for me, using Firefox, if it matters). I had to go to the address bar and manually change the page# in the URL. You're not done until you get to the page titled "Final Words"
---------------------
Anyway, sure looks interesting. I'm surprised that they chose to group all the heatpipes at the outside of the cooling fins, I'd have expected the new, extra pipes to pass through the middle.
I've gotta disagree with Seb:
Slower fan speed means less airflow, which in turn means less heat being removed from the heatsink fins. Which means that slower fan speed = more heat, which is exactly the situation in which this cooler excels. There's still the question of whether the extra impedance from the tight fin spacing and extra heatpipe can offset that advantage in a slow-flow configuration, but my money's on no. I dunno if it'll be a Ninja-killer, but I'll be surprised if it doesn't outperform a standard U-120, even in a fanless test.
Several of the pages had no "next page" button at the bottom (at least for me, using Firefox, if it matters). I had to go to the address bar and manually change the page# in the URL. You're not done until you get to the page titled "Final Words"
---------------------
Anyway, sure looks interesting. I'm surprised that they chose to group all the heatpipes at the outside of the cooling fins, I'd have expected the new, extra pipes to pass through the middle.
I've gotta disagree with Seb:
The AnandTech test indicates that the U-120X is practically the same (-1C) as the original U-120 with little or no overclock, but that it starts to pull way out in front when they really push the overclocking. That's a new efficiency curve, where the cooler gets more and more efficient as heat goes up.As ultimate silent cooler I'm not sure if 6 pipes will help, at the low fan speeds we'd run it may well be that the 4 pipe can move the heat well enough that 6 won't really help and they provide a little more obstruction between the fins.
Slower fan speed means less airflow, which in turn means less heat being removed from the heatsink fins. Which means that slower fan speed = more heat, which is exactly the situation in which this cooler excels. There's still the question of whether the extra impedance from the tight fin spacing and extra heatpipe can offset that advantage in a slow-flow configuration, but my money's on no. I dunno if it'll be a Ninja-killer, but I'll be surprised if it doesn't outperform a standard U-120, even in a fanless test.
-
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:55 am
- Location: EU
Firefox 2.0.0.2 here, all pages have the link.Kremmit wrote:Several of the pages had no "next page" button at the bottom (at least for me, using Firefox, if it matters).
I don't think the extra heatpipes would have been worth the hassle of adding them if they were in the middle.Kremmit wrote:Anyway, sure looks interesting. I'm surprised that they chose to group all the heatpipes at the outside of the cooling fins, I'd have expected the new, extra pipes to pass through the middle.
Air flows faster on the sides; in the middle of the fan you have the hub which obstructs airflow and linear velocity of the wings is minimum.
I would look it at the other way. Every cooler has a limit, that's when its ability to remove heat fast (due to evaporation happening in the heatpipes) is capped, and temperature starts to rise quickly because of increasing importance of transmission by conduction.Kremmit wrote:where the cooler gets more and more efficient as heat goes up.
The 2 more heatpipes on the U120E raise the limit, thus saturation happen at higher temperatures.
Probably not, the U120E will be criticized for being a heavy weight and its tight packed fins, and ultimately labeled as a toy for overclockers and gamers (who obviously must not care about noise )Kremmit wrote:I dunno if it'll be a Ninja-killer, but I'll be surprised if it doesn't outperform a standard U-120, even in a fanless test.
However, I'd switch to the U120E anytime, if I could.
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:06 pm
- Location: New Hampshire, US
- Contact:
basically, you can think of it like resistances in parallel. Two 50 ohm resistors in parallel have a total resistance of 25ohm, add two more, and the total resistance is halved again to 12.5ohm. Adding two more heatpipes reduces the total thermal resistance of the heat pipe cluster. Since heatpipes have an incredibly small thermal resistance already, it allows for heat to be removed more quickly. I find it impressive that the the fins can handle more heat, there must be some optimum between fin surface area and the number of heatpipes, be fun to try and model.
J. Sparrow, good point about the fan hub. My fan is mounted 8 or so inches away from my HS, at the other end of a duct. So I've got no hub-created dead spot, and as a result, I tend to forget about it. Good thing the Thermalright guys are smarter than me, hey?
Well, of course there's an upper limit. I didn't mean to imply that performance would get better and better into infinity. Just pointing out that the U120X doesn't start to really outpace the competition until the heat goes up a notch or two. Fanless systems ought to run hotter, so, theoretically, the U120X should fare better in the fanless test than it's older brother.J. Sparrow wrote:Every cooler has a limit, that's when its ability to remove heat fast (due to evaporation happening in the heatpipes) is capped, and temperature starts to rise quickly because of increasing importance of transmission by conduction.
Not for fanless operation. With the other results so close, and the previous test going the other way, the real winner is still in doubt. Margin-of-error could account for all the differences observed, in either test. A "Ninja-Killer" would be a HS that beat the Ninja decisively, and across-the-board. That's the real challenge for the U-120X; to become the default reccomendation around here.Ender17 wrote:Not sure what you mean by "killer", but the original Ultra 120 already beat the Ninja (barely).Kremmit wrote:I dunno if it'll be a Ninja-killer
Last edited by Kremmit on Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:55 am
- Location: EU
I am waiting for the Ultra 120 Extreme too.
Seems to be a better heatsink than the Scythe Ninja except when you want to have the HR-05 on the Northbridge at the same time.
I guess it will not fit then. Seems tight but barely possible with the Ninja.
A picture is shown in this thread.
viewtopic.php?t=38785
Seems to be a better heatsink than the Scythe Ninja except when you want to have the HR-05 on the Northbridge at the same time.
I guess it will not fit then. Seems tight but barely possible with the Ninja.
A picture is shown in this thread.
viewtopic.php?t=38785
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:23 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
I'm waiting for the Ultra-120 Extreme myself.
At stock speeds my Ninja was just fine on my E6400, and hell, I didn't see much point to changing the cooler when the Ninja did so well at low noise.
However now that my E6400 is OC'ed to 3.2ghz, the additional performance of an Ultra-120 or Infinity was pretty tempting. Almost tempting enough. The Ultra-120 Extreme looks definitely tempting enough to switch to.... maybe. :p :p
At stock speeds my Ninja was just fine on my E6400, and hell, I didn't see much point to changing the cooler when the Ninja did so well at low noise.
However now that my E6400 is OC'ed to 3.2ghz, the additional performance of an Ultra-120 or Infinity was pretty tempting. Almost tempting enough. The Ultra-120 Extreme looks definitely tempting enough to switch to.... maybe. :p :p
-
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:06 am
- Location: Klamath Falls, OR
Just reviewed here. What's surprising is, it beats the Ninja revB handily with an 840RPM Papst 120mm fan on both.
I've been toying getting one of these, but putting a Noctua 120mm @1200 rpm on it. Shouldn't have too much airflow impedence, would it?? Better cooling than my Zalman 9500 I would imagine, and darn quiet with a Noctua on it. Only thing is I hope they can/do rotate 90 degrees on the CPU mount, so they have the option of exhausting out the top for all of us P180 owners......my NB HSF interferes with the standard rear-exhaust setup
Now you can find info at Thermalrights website.
http://www.thermalright.com/
According to Thermalright it has the same weight (790 g) as the IFX-14 cooler (upper body).
I guess this is wrong for the IFX-14 (assuming copy and paste beast was there ).
Old Ultra 120 weight is 745 g (2 heatpipes less than the extreme).
http://www.thermalright.com/
According to Thermalright it has the same weight (790 g) as the IFX-14 cooler (upper body).
I guess this is wrong for the IFX-14 (assuming copy and paste beast was there ).
Old Ultra 120 weight is 745 g (2 heatpipes less than the extreme).
-
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:55 am
- Location: EU
-
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:06 am
- Location: Klamath Falls, OR
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact:
Thermalright ULTRA-120 Extreme 6 Heatpipe Cooler LGA775 S939 S940 S754 Heatsink *Fan Not Included*:
http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php? ... ERMALRIGHT
Reg. Price: $64.50 CAD
****************************************
Wait a minute ... what the heck is this:
http://www.thermalright.com/a_page/main ... _ifx14.htm
IFX-14:
"Feature
Larger surface area than any other heatsinks (140mm x 120mm) with option to install one or even two 140mm fans
Designed for better air flow management to work with the heatsink fans* and the air inside your computer case
Four large 8mm heatpipes to distribute massive amount of heat fast and efficiently
Optional to rotate the heatsink 90 degrees to best fit your system configuration
Multi-platform compatible backplate for installation on vast number and type of motherboard. No need for complicated tools to convert
Includes a back-side dual heatpipe heatsink (patent pending), which not only additionally cools your CPU but also takes care of the heat coming from the back of the motherboard to extend the life expectancy and stability of your motherboard
Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme Ready
AM2 Ready
---------------------------
Technical Spec.
Heatsink Body
- Dimension : L146.2 x W124 x H161 mm (heatsink only)
- Weigh t: 790g (heatsink only)
- Recommended Fan : All 120mm & 140mm Fan
Back-side Heatsink
- Dimension : L134.5 x W163.5 x H112.6 mm (heatsink only)
- Weight : 130g (heatsink only)
- Recommended Fan : All 80mm & 70mm Fan
Compatibility
- INTEL: All Intel Socket LGA775 processors
- AMD: Athlon64 / FX / X2 / Opteron Socket AM2 processors"
http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php? ... ERMALRIGHT
Reg. Price: $64.50 CAD
****************************************
Wait a minute ... what the heck is this:
http://www.thermalright.com/a_page/main ... _ifx14.htm
IFX-14:
"Feature
Larger surface area than any other heatsinks (140mm x 120mm) with option to install one or even two 140mm fans
Designed for better air flow management to work with the heatsink fans* and the air inside your computer case
Four large 8mm heatpipes to distribute massive amount of heat fast and efficiently
Optional to rotate the heatsink 90 degrees to best fit your system configuration
Multi-platform compatible backplate for installation on vast number and type of motherboard. No need for complicated tools to convert
Includes a back-side dual heatpipe heatsink (patent pending), which not only additionally cools your CPU but also takes care of the heat coming from the back of the motherboard to extend the life expectancy and stability of your motherboard
Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme Ready
AM2 Ready
---------------------------
Technical Spec.
Heatsink Body
- Dimension : L146.2 x W124 x H161 mm (heatsink only)
- Weigh t: 790g (heatsink only)
- Recommended Fan : All 120mm & 140mm Fan
Back-side Heatsink
- Dimension : L134.5 x W163.5 x H112.6 mm (heatsink only)
- Weight : 130g (heatsink only)
- Recommended Fan : All 80mm & 70mm Fan
Compatibility
- INTEL: All Intel Socket LGA775 processors
- AMD: Athlon64 / FX / X2 / Opteron Socket AM2 processors"
There is also an 90. Let me see if I find the link to it.
Like I always say. THermy FTW!
Thermalright Ultima-90 ES!!!
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/sho ... p?t=137838
Like I always say. THermy FTW!
Thermalright Ultima-90 ES!!!
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/sho ... p?t=137838
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:06 pm
- Location: New Hampshire, US
- Contact:
So, the new lineup is the Ultra-120 Extreme, IFX, and the Ultima-90? When will we see some comparative reviews? I don't think I'll be upgrading from the Ultra 120, full load temps are only 44C.MC FLMJIG wrote:There is also an 90. Let me see if I find the link to it.
Like I always say. THermy FTW!
Thermalright Ultima-90 ES!!!
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/sho ... p?t=137838
-
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:06 am
- Location: Klamath Falls, OR
-
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 7:55 am
- Location: EU
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:39 pm
Uh oh, looks like we have another winner there. Sweet.MC FLMJIG wrote:There is also an 90. Let me see if I find the link to it.
Like I always say. THermy FTW!
Thermalright Ultima-90 ES!!!
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/sho ... p?t=137838