Quiet 400gb drive. Suggestions?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
Quiet 400gb drive. Suggestions?
Okay, I've silenced my computer. I can't hear it any more, so I guess it's quiter than ambient noise =)
Problem is, I've suspended my 200gb Samsung Spinpoint, but realised that there's no room for my other 3 drives(1 maxtor, 2 wd). Besides, I guess their combined strength would make my computer quite audible again.
So I'm going to sell them and buy myself a 400 gb drive instead, that I can put on the accoustifoam lined case floor.
I haven't got an idea on which drive to chose though - samsung doesn't go higher than 250.
Options:
Western Digital 400GB SATA 7200.
Hitachi 7K400 400GB 7200 SATA
Hitachi 7K400 400GB 7200 ATA
Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 400GB SATA
Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 400GB IDE ATA
So, which one is my new drive? Or any other? As it'll sit on foam, vibration noise isn't an issue...
Please help me, almighty forum =)
// Baloubic
Problem is, I've suspended my 200gb Samsung Spinpoint, but realised that there's no room for my other 3 drives(1 maxtor, 2 wd). Besides, I guess their combined strength would make my computer quite audible again.
So I'm going to sell them and buy myself a 400 gb drive instead, that I can put on the accoustifoam lined case floor.
I haven't got an idea on which drive to chose though - samsung doesn't go higher than 250.
Options:
Western Digital 400GB SATA 7200.
Hitachi 7K400 400GB 7200 SATA
Hitachi 7K400 400GB 7200 ATA
Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 400GB SATA
Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 400GB IDE ATA
So, which one is my new drive? Or any other? As it'll sit on foam, vibration noise isn't an issue...
Please help me, almighty forum =)
// Baloubic
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:56 am
I'm not sure, but I'm running a seagate and it seems quiet. It's also cheap and seagate as a solid rep as a reliable drive maker. NCQ helps too.
Compare
Compare
According to that test, it'd seem that the Hitachi 400gb is more quiet than the barracuda. I've always considered Hitachi drives to be "fast, efficient and loud", but perhaps I was wrong.
It's low idle noise that's most important, as it'll be more of a storage drive(for obvious reasons), while low seek is more of a bonus.
My general opinion of ATA WD drives has been "loud and slow", but I've heard some good things about their new fluid bearing, etc, so I'm not so sure about them anymore.
So, after that sound measurment test you've linked to, I'm leaning towards the Hitachi 7K400 over the Seagate Barracuda. Am I right or wrong in doing so?
How about the Western Digital drives... Are they silent nowadays, and, if so, how is the quality of the line(i.e does noise levels currently differ much between samples, as I've heard other people complain about)?
Thanks,
Baloubic
It's low idle noise that's most important, as it'll be more of a storage drive(for obvious reasons), while low seek is more of a bonus.
My general opinion of ATA WD drives has been "loud and slow", but I've heard some good things about their new fluid bearing, etc, so I'm not so sure about them anymore.
So, after that sound measurment test you've linked to, I'm leaning towards the Hitachi 7K400 over the Seagate Barracuda. Am I right or wrong in doing so?
How about the Western Digital drives... Are they silent nowadays, and, if so, how is the quality of the line(i.e does noise levels currently differ much between samples, as I've heard other people complain about)?
Thanks,
Baloubic
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:56 am
Well I can see you value sound above all else. I would say that while the hitachi sounds more quiet, is 3 decibles really that much of a diff? I dunno. If so, maybe the best thing to do is to create a storage server and put it some place else.
Eitherway, I thought seagate was one of the most quiet, how things change!
Maybe we need to let other people post some more results, ideas and experiances.
Eitherway, I thought seagate was one of the most quiet, how things change!
Maybe we need to let other people post some more results, ideas and experiances.
Have you seen this? http://www.silentpcreview.com/article256-page1.html
I have a Hitachi 160 GB 7K250 SATA disk. It require serious decoupling. However, when it's decoupled properly, it's very, very quit.
I have a Hitachi 160 GB 7K250 SATA disk. It require serious decoupling. However, when it's decoupled properly, it's very, very quit.
The following can shed some light on things: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decibelmerovingian wrote:I would say that while the hitachi sounds more quiet, is 3 decibles really that much of a diff?
About half way down the article it says the following:
I'd take the sound measurements made by Anandtech with a grain of salt. So while those charts might tell us something of the relative sound power given out by the different drives, I'd work from the assumption that they have a pretty big margin of error.A 3 dB increase in the level of continuous noise doubles the sound power, however experimentation has determined that the frequency response of the human ear results in a perceived doubling of loudness with every 10 dB increase; a 5 dB increase is a readily noticeable change, while a 3 dB increase is barely noticeable to most people.
Cool, acctually, I've read it but forgot about it =)Have you seen this? http://www.silentpcreview.com/article256-page1.html
In any case... After reading that review, and then checking up on the Barracuda on storagereview, I've got to say that 3 platters sounds way more promising than 5 no matter what anandtech thinks... =)
By going with 3 instead of 5, the sound levels cannt be higher(at least no by much) and I get way more performance for my buck... I guess the WD is a 4 platter design, in which case I'd opt for the seagate for the same resons. Besides, I haven't yet seen a WD score low in a noise measurment contest.
So, my vote has changed. I'm back with the barracuda. Am I wrong?
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:53 am
- Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Here's another idea, build a cheap server machine and put all of your HDDs
in there. Then put a 2.5" notebook drive in your HTPC. Hook the two up
over a network, get the HTPC to automatically wake/suspend the server,
and life's good and silent! I bet you could build a server for less than the
price of a 400GB drive...
I know, this isn't a new/original idea, just thought it was worth mentioning.
erikt
in there. Then put a 2.5" notebook drive in your HTPC. Hook the two up
over a network, get the HTPC to automatically wake/suspend the server,
and life's good and silent! I bet you could build a server for less than the
price of a 400GB drive...
I know, this isn't a new/original idea, just thought it was worth mentioning.
erikt
-
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm
lol, that is wicked, Hitachi 7K400 takes at least 17 seconds to spin up and you can't really tell if it did because the sample is only 17 seconds...merovingian wrote:I'm not sure, but I'm running a seagate and it seems quiet. It's also cheap and seagate as a solid rep as a reliable drive maker. NCQ helps too.
Compare