Any sign of the i-RAM 2?

Silencing hard drives, optical drives and other storage devices

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
j4cbo
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:03 am

Any sign of the i-RAM 2?

Post by j4cbo » Sun Jun 25, 2006 7:01 pm

It's been a while since I've heard mention of the i-RAM 2 - supposed to use SATA 3 Gb/s, DDR2, and so on. The few articles I can find say it'll be released in February 2006 (ahahahaha).

The original i-RAM seems to have shot up in price... the 2 looks like it'd be perfect, if it ever comes out.

Anyone know if it's been abandoned or not?

ultraboy
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 547
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Bangkok Thailand

Post by ultraboy » Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:44 am

Last time I heard, they moved the whole thingy to 5.25" bay. Here's report from TechPowerUp. Not much details though - especially how're they going to keep it powered during PC off. :?:

JonV
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:05 pm

Post by JonV » Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:16 am

It was shown at Computex, with a release date "several months" away.

The power details confuse me - they seem to be saying that it'll be powered by a standard molex, but they also say that data will be kept as long as there's "standby power". I didn't think "standby power" involved any power going to the molex connectors?

ultraboy
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 547
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Bangkok Thailand

Post by ultraboy » Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:39 am

The molex is probably to keep back-up battery happy while pc is on.

I guess they may have to give a 24-pin passthrough connector just to tap on +5VSB, or a wire that can be crimped (is that the word? :roll:) onto +5VSB line. The latter is cheaper but too risky as user may lock on to a wrong wire.

j4cbo
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:03 am

Post by j4cbo » Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:17 pm

Only four DIMM slots? :x

nici
Posts: 3011
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:49 am
Location: Suomi Finland Perkele

Post by nici » Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:00 pm

No installing Vista on that without 4x4Gb sticks of ram, at least the Beta2 requires 15Gb to install.. I tried installing on a 8Gb partition IIRC, and it said minimum size 14900Mb or something like taht.. so i made it 30gigs.

I still like the idea of the thing, but the design looks a bit sucky to be honest...

Eunos
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 378
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:29 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by Eunos » Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:32 pm

The articles say the maximum is only 8 gb - how hard is it for them to add extra slots? The requirement for a 5.25" bay is another downside, and with decent-capacity flash-based drives on the way, there hardly seems any point.

nici
Posts: 3011
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:49 am
Location: Suomi Finland Perkele

Post by nici » Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:42 pm

Wich is probably why they will delay the release until all but a few nutters on SPCR has forgot about the whole thing... :lol:

8Gb max? I can´t imagine that selling at all when vista is released then. Not that 16Gb of DDR2 would be cheap anyway.

I wouldn´t really care where its mounted or what shape it is, just as long it doesn´t have a gazillion cables going all over the case(unlikely) and it works.

Copper
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 587
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 8:43 am

Post by Copper » Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:07 am

nici wrote:Wich is probably why they will delay the release until all but a few nutters on SPCR has forgot about the whole thing... :lol:
Hey, I like my i-rams. :D
8Gb max? I can´t imagine that selling at all when vista is released then. Not that 16Gb of DDR2 would be cheap anyway.
I didn't realize Vista is going to be so big, but should have expected it anyway. It wont even fit on my i-rams raided (8GB combined).

Imagine 32GB of RAM to get two iram2s raided. Pricey and complicated! I have to think that it's going to be a big negative to sales if the primary consumer OS wont even fit on the drive.

nici
Posts: 3011
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:49 am
Location: Suomi Finland Perkele

Post by nici » Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:17 am

I wouldn´t mind an i-Ram myself now.. :)

Anyway, it was just the Beta2, for all i know the official release might be smaller... Or not. But if its actually that big, then i honestly don´t see this selling too well if it will ever actually be released...

highlandsun
Posts: 139
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by highlandsun » Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:35 am

I think this is an area where flash is still going to rule. With Samsung's new 2Gbit chips (vs the previous 1Gbit chips) densities and speeds will double.

http://theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=32663

That means it will be plausible to have a 128GB 2.5" drive running at full SATA1 speed, which would be pretty usable...

Copper
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 587
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 8:43 am

Post by Copper » Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:58 pm

You're probably right. Volitility of the RAM drive alone seemingly ensures it's never going beyond niche.

jb_
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 11:16 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by jb_ » Thu Jun 29, 2006 4:23 pm

Eunos wrote:The articles say the maximum is only 8 gb - how hard is it for them to add extra slots? The requirement for a 5.25" bay is another downside, and with decent-capacity flash-based drives on the way, there hardly seems any point.
Adding more memory slots would require either:

1. Registered DIMMs (to maintain signal reliability with such a high load on the memory bus) or
2. More memory controllers (more expensive) and a more complex FPGA to interleave data among them (more expense and power consumption).

Add to that, a higher load on the 5V standby power (the limit of which 4 dimms come close to reaching) and the battery life being as short as it is already (10-16 h) and adding more memory slots is quite an unattractive proposition for an enthusiast-level device :)

ultraboy
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 547
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: Bangkok Thailand

Post by ultraboy » Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:30 am

With this Super Talent 2.5 inch 8GB IDE Flash Drive as used in recent SPCR review on Puget's system - cost around USD 380 for 8 GB, I think i-RAM2 does not have much chance of success.

highlandsun
Posts: 139
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:04 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by highlandsun » Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:53 pm

Eh, that SuperTalent drive is pathetic, maximum of 12MB/sec write speed. And they build that entire 2.5"size case for a measly 8GB, when you can get 20MB/sec 8GB compact flash cards on the same web site for only $170. IMO this SuperTalent product is junk. If it were the same speed as the iRAM it might be worth thinking about, but it's far from it.

I figure there's three main factors: performance, capacity, and bottom line price. Regular NAND flash can beat the iRAM on capacity pretty easily, so any flash product that only provides equivalent capacity is just not offering enough. Driving flash in parallel will easily provide enough performance to max out the hard drive interface, thus making flash and iRAM performance equivalent, so again, any flash product that doesn't provide equivalent performance just isn't offering enough.

Slaugh
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:27 am
Location: Quebec, Canada

Post by Slaugh » Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:28 pm

The Tech Report reviewed the Super Talent's IDE flash drive and compared it with four Seagate Momentus, a Barracuda 7200.9, a Western Digital Scorpio, two Hitachi Travelstar, and the Fujitsu MHV2040AT. Right now, these drives are not very good performers, but they are dead silent, without any mechanical part, and they consume between 0.07 and 0.38 watts only.

Super Talent's 2.5" IDE Flash hard drive - Why wait for hybrids?

Poodle
Posts: 254
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 3:17 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden.

Post by Poodle » Sun Jul 23, 2006 4:19 pm

Slaugh wrote:The Tech Report Right now, these drives are not very good performers, but they are dead silent, without any mechanical part, and they consume between 0.07 and 0.38 watts only.

Super Talent's 2.5" IDE Flash hard drive - Why wait for hybrids?


I hear ya. 8 or 16Gb of I-ram must consume a whole lot of power. And remember that it does so even when the computer is turned off. Maybe we are not talking kilowatts but the flash solution seems more green to me. But the write speed is too low at the moment.


I havn't done my homework on Vista but I heard something that it supports Nand Flash via Usb to keep the page file on it or I actually think it was that new "buffer file" (Frequently used data, to make access times lower). Vista reads from this file a lot more than it writes to i so Flash makes a lot more sense here. But I might be wrong... :?:

Post Reply