XP ram limitations - considerations for upgrade to 4GB?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
XP ram limitations - considerations for upgrade to 4GB?
Hi guys
I couldn't find anything on this using the search function, but sorry if it has already been discussed (also, it's not quite 'silent related' in other ways than that my PC is silent ).
I currently have 2GB ram (2x1GB Corsair PC5400), but as I play a fair bit of Gothic 3, I think I could use as much ram as I can stuff in there. I know that XP has a limitation of 3GB, but my question is whether it would cause problems to throw in another set of 2x1GB Corsairs? The reason being, that the price difference compared to 2x512MB is less than 30 euro/ 40$, and with 4GB I would be sort of 'ready for Vista' [yearh right ].
But anyways, will there be any slow downs or other problems with putting 4x1GB in an XP machine?
Thanks in advance
Best regards
Morten
-and yes, I know a faster GPU would be of more help in Gothic 3, but I really like my silent 8600GT
I couldn't find anything on this using the search function, but sorry if it has already been discussed (also, it's not quite 'silent related' in other ways than that my PC is silent ).
I currently have 2GB ram (2x1GB Corsair PC5400), but as I play a fair bit of Gothic 3, I think I could use as much ram as I can stuff in there. I know that XP has a limitation of 3GB, but my question is whether it would cause problems to throw in another set of 2x1GB Corsairs? The reason being, that the price difference compared to 2x512MB is less than 30 euro/ 40$, and with 4GB I would be sort of 'ready for Vista' [yearh right ].
But anyways, will there be any slow downs or other problems with putting 4x1GB in an XP machine?
Thanks in advance
Best regards
Morten
-and yes, I know a faster GPU would be of more help in Gothic 3, but I really like my silent 8600GT
-
- Posts: 1839
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:10 pm
- Location: Northern New Jersey
- Contact:
XP itself is not limited to 3GB of RAM, 32bit operating systems are limited to ~3gb of RAM.
if you run a 64 bit operating system, you'll be able to utilize past 4gb of RAM no problems. of course there are problems such as incompatibilities and such that will come with a 64 bit operating system.
most programs are not coded for 64 bit, so some may not run, while others may install perfectly, but be completely instable. it depends on how much you're willing to push for everything to work.
in adding 4x1GB RAM, just make sure that you're using either your boards standard speed, or know that it may not run full speed. IE, a system with a 667mhz memory standard will run DDR2-800 @ 667mhz, not 800mhz. other than that, theres nothing to worry about except the brand...Corsair? Kingston? i use G-Skill with no complaints.
as for Vista, i wouldn't reccomend it to anyone ever...i have it, i hate it, i put it in the basement. maybe in a few years it'll be worth installing.
if you run a 64 bit operating system, you'll be able to utilize past 4gb of RAM no problems. of course there are problems such as incompatibilities and such that will come with a 64 bit operating system.
most programs are not coded for 64 bit, so some may not run, while others may install perfectly, but be completely instable. it depends on how much you're willing to push for everything to work.
in adding 4x1GB RAM, just make sure that you're using either your boards standard speed, or know that it may not run full speed. IE, a system with a 667mhz memory standard will run DDR2-800 @ 667mhz, not 800mhz. other than that, theres nothing to worry about except the brand...Corsair? Kingston? i use G-Skill with no complaints.
as for Vista, i wouldn't reccomend it to anyone ever...i have it, i hate it, i put it in the basement. maybe in a few years it'll be worth installing.
I currently run a 4X1GB ballistix setup due to not planning for 2X2GB originally. This definitely doesn't allow for great memory overclocking, but beyond that it should be fine on any decent board. It's certainly more likely to run into random memory compatability issues with 4X1 than 2X1. XP will usually allow somewhere between 3.25 to 3.5GB of ram to be visible, which means you're losing very little. And no there should be no other issues.
-
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:39 pm
- Location: Denver, Colorado USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 9:48 am
- Contact:
I use XP-64 here at work (on a quad proc machine with 8 gigs of ram) and I have experienced no problems. The only thing that I could imagine being a problem is drivers.bonestonne wrote: if you run a 64 bit operating system, you'll be able to utilize past 4gb of RAM no problems. of course there are problems such as incompatibilities and such that will come with a 64 bit operating system.
most programs are not coded for 64 bit, so some may not run, while others may install perfectly, but be completely instable. it depends on how much you're willing to push for everything to work.
-
- Posts: 1839
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:10 pm
- Location: Northern New Jersey
- Contact:
The 1.5x recommendation is something I never understood, as it makes no sense. You do need a swap file, but you don't need it to be big. On my old PC with 512 MB of memory, I had a swap file of the same size and never encountered problems (then again, I haven't edited 34987x59854px pictures in Photoshop or something). Right now, I have 2 GB of memory, and again a swap file of 512 MB.
You can't go wrong with a swap file that is "too large", but on the other hand, it's silly to waste much disk space. If in doubt, set it to 2 GB and forget all about it.
You can't go wrong with a swap file that is "too large", but on the other hand, it's silly to waste much disk space. If in doubt, set it to 2 GB and forget all about it.
There was a discussion on StorageReview about that but I can't seem to find it using search. So I'll contribute by giving the following links for reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=291988
Ah... finally found that one from SR:
http://forums.storagereview.net/index.p ... opic=25819
(warning! It's not too easy to read all those contradicting opinions on that thread, but it's understandable that a difficult matter will create differing views)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_Address_Extension
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=291988
Ah... finally found that one from SR:
http://forums.storagereview.net/index.p ... opic=25819
(warning! It's not too easy to read all those contradicting opinions on that thread, but it's understandable that a difficult matter will create differing views)
-
- Posts: 1839
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:10 pm
- Location: Northern New Jersey
- Contact:
i tweaked one of my older computers, i ran windows in the RAM [registry hack] and disabled the pagefile. worked faster, but couldn't be left on overnight...it had to be turned off every 16-23 hours or the system would become completely unresponsive...apps wouldn't load, system would lag.
although it was a good hack for those short spurts of using the computer for editing.
although it was a good hack for those short spurts of using the computer for editing.
-
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:57 pm
- Location: Minnesota
edit; i read too fast.! i get it now.bonestonne wrote:i tweaked one of my older computers, i ran windows in the RAM [registry hack] and disabled the pagefile. worked faster, but couldn't be left on overnight...it had to be turned off every 16-23 hours or the system would become completely unresponsive...apps wouldn't load, system would lag.
although it was a good hack for those short spurts of using the computer for editing.
Last edited by protellect on Wed Sep 19, 2007 7:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1839
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:10 pm
- Location: Northern New Jersey
- Contact:
Here's a really good article on the issue: http://www.dansdata.com/askdan00015.htm
I'm still a bit confused though, as I haven't seen anything in the BIOS of my GA-P35-DS3P board about memory remapping. I'm using Vista 64-bit, which shows 4093 MB of memory in Task Manager. I suppose that means I'm using it, but I'm not totally sure.
I'm still a bit confused though, as I haven't seen anything in the BIOS of my GA-P35-DS3P board about memory remapping. I'm using Vista 64-bit, which shows 4093 MB of memory in Task Manager. I suppose that means I'm using it, but I'm not totally sure.
-
- SPCR Reviewer
- Posts: 561
- Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
Not entirely true. If you want the full story, read this article - Memory Management - Dude where's my RAM?bonestonne wrote:XP itself is not limited to 3GB of RAM, 32bit operating systems are limited to ~3gb of RAM.
The simple answer - it's hardware dependant. Even with a 64-bit OS, if the hardware you're using can't properly address the 4GB of devices you have in your system, then you're never going to use it.
Thanks for all your input. After reading through all the linked articles, I decided to 'play it safe' and go for 2x512MB. After installing, CPU-Z shows 3GB dual channel and Windows Control panel shows 2,93GB, which isn't too bad. I haven't really noticed any performance changes in games, but subjectively, Windows loads faster (I think).
I don't really know how to meassure the performance change. You might argue that it wasn't the most cost-effective upgrade, but what the heck
Morten
I don't really know how to meassure the performance change. You might argue that it wasn't the most cost-effective upgrade, but what the heck
Morten
The only thing there is that to be able to install a 64-bit OS, the hardware must support it, which will automatically mean it supports >4GB of memory!Nick Geraedts wrote:[The simple answer - it's hardware dependant. Even with a 64-bit OS, if the hardware you're using can't properly address the 4GB of devices you have in your system, then you're never going to use it.
By the way, the 4GB limit with 32bit XP and Vista is artificial. Using Physical Addressing Extensions (linked a couple of posts up), any 32bit windows server OS apart from standard edition can all support >4GB, with the maximum supported memory being 128GB for datacentre. I'd presume linux supports PAE as well.
-
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:10 pm
- Location: Toronto - Ontario - Canada
-
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:10 pm
- Location: Toronto - Ontario - Canada
Not sure what the Creative issue is with x64 but like I said I ran it from November of las year till August 28 and had no issues. Only reason I am not using now is Adobe does not like x64. One thing I did was to get the Vista CD from Creative - this has more than the download so maybe that is what make the difference.