Anyone else not liking Gentle Typhoons?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
Anyone else not liking Gentle Typhoons?
My case has 4 (5 inc CPU cooler) S-Flex Es (running at 660rpm) and 2 Gentle Typhoon 1850s running at (990rpm).
I find the SFlex fans great, nice noise level and signature. I bought the 2 GTs following reviews that they had a high CFM and a nice noise signature, at higher speeds than most other fans.
However, I find they have an odd noise, especially when changing speeds, and sometimes at certain speeds they make an odd noise as if the bearings aren't quite right - difficult to explain.
They aren't more noisy, just have an odd noise to them.
Anyone else experience this?
I find the SFlex fans great, nice noise level and signature. I bought the 2 GTs following reviews that they had a high CFM and a nice noise signature, at higher speeds than most other fans.
However, I find they have an odd noise, especially when changing speeds, and sometimes at certain speeds they make an odd noise as if the bearings aren't quite right - difficult to explain.
They aren't more noisy, just have an odd noise to them.
Anyone else experience this?
Re: Anyone else not liking Gentle Typhoons?
That seems to be a recurring complaint from some people - others swear by them.gcwebbyuk wrote:My case has 4 (5 inc CPU cooler) S-Flex Es (running at 660rpm) and 2 Gentle Typhoon 1850s running at (990rpm).
I find the SFlex fans great, nice noise level and signature. I bought the 2 GTs following reviews that they had a high CFM and a nice noise signature, at higher speeds than most other fans.
However, I find they have an odd noise, especially when changing speeds, and sometimes at certain speeds they make an odd noise as if the bearings aren't quite right - difficult to explain.
They aren't more noisy, just have an odd noise to them.
Anyone else experience this?
Someone said that particular GTs may have resonances at certain speeds, but that if you run them at their 12 volt speed you avoid the resonance.
Re: Anyone else not liking Gentle Typhoons?
Let me guess - the review was not an SPCR review...gcwebbyuk wrote:My case has 4 (5 inc CPU cooler) S-Flex Es (running at 660rpm) and 2 Gentle Typhoon 1850s running at (990rpm).
I find the SFlex fans great, nice noise level and signature. I bought the 2 GTs following reviews that they had a high CFM and a nice noise signature, at higher speeds than most other fans.
However, I find they have an odd noise, especially when changing speeds, and sometimes at certain speeds they make an odd noise as if the bearings aren't quite right - difficult to explain.
They aren't more noisy, just have an odd noise to them.
Anyone else experience this?
About the noise - no need to explain, its just a bad fan. Good fans should sound better when undervolted.
I can swear by them too - that at 12V ~1800 RPM they sound like an actual typhoon (or at least a 12cm equivalent).
BTW why do you need so many fans?
I have a single Gentle Typhoon in my system and I like it. Earlier I used a Slipstream and before that a Nexus. All three are good but the Slipstream and the Nexus both had a faint ticking sound that worsened with time.
The Gentle Typhoon is double ball bearing and I hope it will endure a bit longer than the two others. The bearing sound is there, but it doesn't bother me much. It's a faint whisper and constant. A much less intruding sound than a ticking sound.
Mine is an 800RPM model, on a temperature controlled fan header, so RPM is usually at ~400 or lower and it's really quiet. I use silicon fan mounts.
This assessment is from a SPCR point of view, believe me. This fan is the only moving part in my system.
The Gentle Typhoon is double ball bearing and I hope it will endure a bit longer than the two others. The bearing sound is there, but it doesn't bother me much. It's a faint whisper and constant. A much less intruding sound than a ticking sound.
Mine is an 800RPM model, on a temperature controlled fan header, so RPM is usually at ~400 or lower and it's really quiet. I use silicon fan mounts.
This assessment is from a SPCR point of view, believe me. This fan is the only moving part in my system.
-
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:03 am
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
Oh please! this could be the biggest load of crap you've ever posted here.ces wrote:Ball bearings have small points of contact compared to sleeve bearings. As a result they don't tolerate shipping as well as to sleeve fans.
Do you know anything about bearings? Ball bearings are made from precision ground, hard steel. In a fan assembly they are located in a plastic frame. To achieve an acceleration high enough to damage the bearings the fan's frame would have disintegrated.
Look, these may be high end fans for consumer products, but they are not expensive cooling fans. The same general sized fans used in our aircraft's communications amplifier's PS costs about 50 times as much.
You need to calm down, you are getting out of control. You are taking this all too seriously. It's just not that important to get so wrapped up about it.b_rubenstein wrote:Oh please! this could be the biggest load of crap you've ever posted here.ces wrote:Ball bearings have small points of contact compared to sleeve bearings. As a result they don't tolerate shipping as well as to sleeve fans.
Do you know anything about bearings? Ball bearings are made from precision ground, hard steel. In a fan assembly they are located in a plastic frame. To achieve an acceleration high enough to damage the bearings the fan's frame would have disintegrated.
Look, these may be high end fans for consumer products, but they are not expensive cooling fans. The same general sized fans used in our aircraft's communications amplifier's PS costs about 50 times as much.
That is what I was informed by Dorothy Bradbury a UK fan engineer who is a respected and vigorous advocate of using ball bearing fans as opposed to sleeve bearings in fans. After she explained it, it made a lot of sense to me. High precision precision ball bearings, such as the ones used in her fans, are made to very high tolerances - in the order of 50 to 150 atoms in thickness according to Dorothy. So it doesn't take much of a dent in such a surface to disturb that tolerance.
Of course that is just theory. This is backed up by her experience. She ships ball bearing fans for a living.
Here is what MikeC thinks of Dorthy:
http://www.silentpcreview.com/article63-page1.html
(go to the bottom of that page, it has a link to her website)
Re: Anyone else not liking Gentle Typhoons?
gcwebbyuk wrote:Gentle Typhoon 1850s running at (990rpm)
gcwebbyuk wrote:They aren't more noisy, just have an odd noise to them.
Mine are similarly configured, and behaving much the same. They are indeed odd compared with other fans I've used. At certain speeds they sound wrong, increase the voltage a tiny amount and it the sound improves considerably. I found that with these overall noise is more sensitive to the relative speeds as well. Maybe it's to do with the large hub and high airflow. I had a faint high pitched noise coming from the motherboard - initially I thought it was the fans, but after disabling them and trying different speed combinations I realised the motherboard noise could be amplified or eliminated, whereas my Noctua's don't really alter the tone much at all.gcwebbyuk wrote:Anyone else experience this?
A bit more effort required then to set up the GTs. What is clear cut is that the GTs much more effective at cooling my H50 radiator compared with the stock Corsair fan, Noctua or Lian Li case fans
Re: Anyone else not liking Gentle Typhoons?
Which model GTs are you running at what voltages and rpms?IanM wrote: At certain speeds they sound wrong, increase the voltage a tiny amount and it the sound improves considerably. I found that with these overall noise is more sensitive to the relative speeds as well. Maybe it's to do with the large hub and high airflow. I had a faint high pitched noise coming from the motherboard - initially I thought it was the fans, but after disabling them and trying different speed combinations I realised the motherboard noise could be amplified or eliminated, whereas my Noctua's don't really alter the tone much at all.
A bit more effort required then to set up the GTs. What is clear cut is that the GTs much more effective at cooling my H50 radiator compared with the stock Corsair fan, Noctua or Lian Li case fans
same as the OP, 1850rpm model. As a test, using a Noctua ULNA from my S12s into the motherboard headers the fan speed is reported as being 990-1050rpm. In practice I'm using a Lian Li PT-FN03 which is a simple potentiometer that down volts up to 4 fans in one go. Unfortunately I haven't figured out a way to get a report on the actual fan speeds using this simple controller.
So is the takeaway from your experience that if you are going to use GTs, you want to use a variable fan controller so that you can adjust the exact speed of the fans to avoid those harmonic range areas where they generate higher levels of noise?IanM wrote:same as the OP, 1850rpm model. As a test, using a Noctua ULNA from my S12s into the motherboard headers the fan speed is reported as being 990-1050rpm. In practice I'm using a Lian Li PT-FN03 which is a simple potentiometer that down volts up to 4 fans in one go. Unfortunately I haven't figured out a way to get a report on the actual fan speeds using this simple controller.
Re: Anyone else not liking Gentle Typhoons?
I've noticed that too, especially coming from using Noctua NF-P12's on my H50. But for the amount of air they move at comparable noise levels, there's no beating them!IanM wrote: Mine are similarly configured, and behaving much the same. They are indeed odd compared with other fans I've used. At certain speeds they sound wrong, increase the voltage a tiny amount and it the sound improves considerably. I found that with these overall noise is more sensitive to the relative speeds as well. Maybe it's to do with the large hub and high airflow. I had a faint high pitched noise coming from the motherboard - initially I thought it was the fans, but after disabling them and trying different speed combinations I realised the motherboard noise could be amplified or eliminated, whereas my Noctua's don't really alter the tone much at all.
A bit more effort required then to set up the GTs. What is clear cut is that the GTs much more effective at cooling my H50 radiator compared with the stock Corsair fan, Noctua or Lian Li case fans
I eventually accepted that at higher speeds they will make just a bit more noise but will cool a lot better (my system is kind of demanding, but on the other hand it's under my desk so that helps with noise.
I'm even replacing my P180 tricools with GT1850's.
As far as case cooling options go, I find the Noctua's and Nexus's are better in terms of sound quality but move less air.
I also have some Scythe Kaze Jyuni 120mm 1200rpm & 1900rpm. They perform fantastically well at low voltages but better in set-ups with no resistance. They also seem to generate some vibration which can translate into noise in the wrong case. As soon as you increase the voltage they get noisy.
A fan controller really helps getting the GT noise-temperature balance to where you want it
I have switched from air to WC and need to work out which fans to use on the RX240 radiator.
I have tried running the GTs as intake/exhaust mounted vertically in my case. I have had to run them at 770 rpm front intake, and 900 rpm rear exhaust to make them silent enough.
Using the data from X-Bits review of 120mm fans which included both types (http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cooler ... up_18.html) the S-Flex's would have a lower CFM at the same noise level. Which is making me wander wether to keep the GTs.
From their noise level data, I am finding 30.3-30.4 dBA to be silent.
This would mean running the GTS at 6v, giving 17.13 CFM or the SFlexs at 7v giving 15.54 CFM. If I go slightly higher to 30.6 dBA, then the GTs would be at 8v giving 23.55 CFM and the SFlexs also at 8v giving 19.03 CFM. Giving a bigger difference in CFM at the slightly higher dBA.
Has anyone noticed a difference mounting them horizontally as they would be on the radiator? I am thinking this may be what could be causing the whine when the speed is increased, maybe different load on the bearings?
Radiator should be here tomorrow anyway, so will try with 2 GTs mounted horizontally on the radiator at 6v and have an S-Flex as the rear exhaust fan at 7v.
I have tried running the GTs as intake/exhaust mounted vertically in my case. I have had to run them at 770 rpm front intake, and 900 rpm rear exhaust to make them silent enough.
Using the data from X-Bits review of 120mm fans which included both types (http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cooler ... up_18.html) the S-Flex's would have a lower CFM at the same noise level. Which is making me wander wether to keep the GTs.
From their noise level data, I am finding 30.3-30.4 dBA to be silent.
This would mean running the GTS at 6v, giving 17.13 CFM or the SFlexs at 7v giving 15.54 CFM. If I go slightly higher to 30.6 dBA, then the GTs would be at 8v giving 23.55 CFM and the SFlexs also at 8v giving 19.03 CFM. Giving a bigger difference in CFM at the slightly higher dBA.
Has anyone noticed a difference mounting them horizontally as they would be on the radiator? I am thinking this may be what could be causing the whine when the speed is increased, maybe different load on the bearings?
Radiator should be here tomorrow anyway, so will try with 2 GTs mounted horizontally on the radiator at 6v and have an S-Flex as the rear exhaust fan at 7v.
The GT's seem to produce more static pressure and less noise than any other fan I tested with my radiator - my core temperatures lowered quite a bit and the noise levels are very reasonable - I hardly notice them.
I need to be clear that they are not silent - at least, not the 1850rpm models (though I expecte the slower rpm models to be near-silent). However they never go above a gentle buzz and by decreasing the rpm's they are as near silent as you can get fans with such high static pressure -
I tested them against noiseblockers and noctua nf-p12's. The noctua's were nearly totally silent but the static pressure, while decent was nowhere near the GT's.
The noiseblocker was totally silent but had no static pressure at all.
If silence is your thing and you're ok with slightly higher temps (and obviously do not overclock) I think that Noctua is the way to go. If you want maximum performance balanced with lowest noise go with GT's. Note I have not tested the s-flex, though I have tested practically every other scythe (but not on a radiator)....
I need to be clear that they are not silent - at least, not the 1850rpm models (though I expecte the slower rpm models to be near-silent). However they never go above a gentle buzz and by decreasing the rpm's they are as near silent as you can get fans with such high static pressure -
I tested them against noiseblockers and noctua nf-p12's. The noctua's were nearly totally silent but the static pressure, while decent was nowhere near the GT's.
The noiseblocker was totally silent but had no static pressure at all.
If silence is your thing and you're ok with slightly higher temps (and obviously do not overclock) I think that Noctua is the way to go. If you want maximum performance balanced with lowest noise go with GT's. Note I have not tested the s-flex, though I have tested practically every other scythe (but not on a radiator)....
Which fan would have a better air flow the s-flex 1200rpm or noctua S12b flx 1200rpm, I ask because I have the flex and hate the motor sound comming from the fan I can make it go away by lowering the rpm to 700 but anything higher and u can hear a wine from the motor. I have a chance of getting a noctua fan and was woundering if it's on par with the sflex fan. I herd alot of good things about the s flex but the motor sound is not good there's even a uyoutube video with the same fan and problem.
Cheers for any help I am going to use these as case fans.
I have a gt 1450rpm on my heatsink and find that does give off a high pitched wine as well and if insole it down this greatly reduces is this a faulty fan or is this normal as I want to run it at it's full speed and sound not have to slow it down to stop the wine thanks
Cheers for any help I am going to use these as case fans.
I have a gt 1450rpm on my heatsink and find that does give off a high pitched wine as well and if insole it down this greatly reduces is this a faulty fan or is this normal as I want to run it at it's full speed and sound not have to slow it down to stop the wine thanks
Re:
I always figured that the "ball bearing fans cant be shipped" argument wasn't based on the bearings getting hurt but on the bearings denting the shaft or outer shell. Dents in them would cause a "bumb" noise every rotation. Bearings are hard, i dont know/think the shaft is as hard.ces wrote:You need to calm down, you are getting out of control. You are taking this all too seriously. It's just not that important to get so wrapped up about it.b_rubenstein wrote:Oh please! this could be the biggest load of crap you've ever posted here.ces wrote:Ball bearings have small points of contact compared to sleeve bearings. As a result they don't tolerate shipping as well as to sleeve fans.
Do you know anything about bearings? Ball bearings are made from precision ground, hard steel. In a fan assembly they are located in a plastic frame. To achieve an acceleration high enough to damage the bearings the fan's frame would have disintegrated.
Look, these may be high end fans for consumer products, but they are not expensive cooling fans. The same general sized fans used in our aircraft's communications amplifier's PS costs about 50 times as much.
That is what I was informed by Dorothy Bradbury a UK fan engineer who is a respected and vigorous advocate of using ball bearing fans as opposed to sleeve bearings in fans. After she explained it, it made a lot of sense to me. High precision precision ball bearings, such as the ones used in her fans, are made to very high tolerances - in the order of 50 to 150 atoms in thickness according to Dorothy. So it doesn't take much of a dent in such a surface to disturb that tolerance.
Of course that is just theory. This is backed up by her experience. She ships ball bearing fans for a living.
Here is what MikeC thinks of Dorthy:
http://www.silentpcreview.com/article63-page1.html
(go to the bottom of that page, it has a link to her website)
Last edited by chico1st on Sat Jan 29, 2011 6:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Anyone else not liking Gentle Typhoons?
Have a GT AP-15. Bearing noise is significant @ 950rpm compared (aka quite audible even from 3m away in a minimal ambient noise room) as compared to a S-Flex at 800rpm. I know it's not a fair comparison as rpms are different, but I don't have a fan controller.
My take is: GT's don't have a great noise signature at low rpms as their bearing noise overpowers airflow noise. They do, at high rpms though, compared to other "quiet" fans (eg my 1850 rpm GT is approx as noisy to my ears as a 1200rpm Scythe Slipstream as the SS's turbulence signature is far greater).
Anyone have a different opinion?
My take is: GT's don't have a great noise signature at low rpms as their bearing noise overpowers airflow noise. They do, at high rpms though, compared to other "quiet" fans (eg my 1850 rpm GT is approx as noisy to my ears as a 1200rpm Scythe Slipstream as the SS's turbulence signature is far greater).
Anyone have a different opinion?
Re: Anyone else not liking Gentle Typhoons?
meridius wrote:...I have the flex and hate the motor sound comming from the fan I can make it go away by lowering the rpm to 700 but anything higher and u can hear a wine from the motor...I have a gt 1450rpm on my heatsink and find that does give off a high pitched wine as well...
I put something of an answer to these over here.eNiL wrote:Have a GT AP-15. Bearing noise is significant...Anyone have a different opinion?
Re: Anyone else not liking Gentle Typhoons?
They also move less air than other fans at the same RPM. I guess that is because have much less "blade area" because their motor hub is huge.eNiL wrote:GT's don't have a great noise signature at low rpms as their bearing noise overpowers airflow noise. They do, at high rpms though, compared to other "quiet" fans (eg my 1850 rpm GT is approx as noisy to my ears as a 1200rpm Scythe Slipstream as the SS's turbulence signature is far greater).
I have found in my studies of quality fans (Scythe, Noiseblocker and the likes) that all things being equal, variations among fans of the same model is greater than differences between different fans. All fans seem to be quite partial to faulty bearings, atypical motor noise etc., so it seems to be just as likely that two Slip Stream fans @800 rpm have different sound qualities as a Nexus fan running at an equivalent speed.
The hardcore silencers at SPCR will want to slow down every fan far enough that no air turbulance noise is audible anymore. At these speeds, no quality fan should emit motor or bearing noises. If they do, they are faulty.