The Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ITX is a bulky mini-ITX tower with enthusiast grade features including support for thick 240/280 mm radiators, mounting points for a reservoir and pump, and a monstrous 200 mm front fan.
May 26, 2015 by Lawrence Lee
Product | Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ITX Mini-ITX Tower Case |
Manufacturer | |
Street Price | US$65 US$70 with window |
The Enthoo Evolv ITX is based on the larger Enthoo Evolv microATX tower, which is a higher-end model with an aluminum exterior. The mini-ITX version is not as flashy, attempting to bring a similar enthusiast feature-set to a smaller form factor and lower price-point. The Evolv ITX hits the US$60 (US$65 for the windowed version) mark thanks to its smaller size and more typical steel/plastic construction. The front and top panels are mostly solid but doesn’t follow a boxy minimalist aesthetic. The case is octagonal with angled corners which makes it a little less conventional, though it still doesn’t really stand out in any way. The wide slits on each side of the front panel have an odd look; it’s necessary to help feed air to the front fan.
|
The single stock fan is one of its big selling points. Secured under the front panel is a 200 mm monster large enough to help cool the CPU, GPU, and hard drive all on its own. Otherwise, it has all the cooling features you would expect with an additional fan mount at the rear, room for a dual radiator at the top, and enough clearance for a fairly tall CPU cooler and long video card. It has similar functionality to the BitFenix Prodigy, but the bulkier Evolv ITX can accept larger radiators/fans, the motherboard orientation is vertical rather than horizontal, and the hard drive bays are designed with a secondary function: They can be removed so that a pump and reservoir can be mounted in their place. These dedicated positions make it easy to install a custom watercooling loop rather than just a basic AIO model.
|
|
Inside the package is a small accessory box with a set of screws, standoffs, and zip-ties in a plastic baggy along with a very brief installation guide. Our sample also shipped with optional hard drive and pump brackets which are actually sold separately and are not included with the retail version of the case.
Relevant Specifications: Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ITX (from the product web page) | ||||
Case Specifications | ||||
Dimension | 230 mm x 375 mm x 395 mm (W x H x D) 9.1 in x 14.8 in x15.6 in | |||
Form Factor | Mini ITX Tower Chassis | |||
Material(s) | Steel plates, Plastic, Steel chassis | |||
Motherboard Support | Mini ITX | |||
Front I/O | 2x USB 3.0, Mic, Headphone, Reset | |||
Side Window | Yes | |||
Expansion & Drive Bays | ||||
Expansion slots | 2 | |||
Internal 3.5″ | 2 (1 slot for upgrade) | |||
Internal 2.5″ | 1 (1 slot for upgrade) | |||
Cooling | 120 mm fan | 140 mm fan | 200 mm fan | |
Front | 2x | 2x | 1x (included) | |
Top | 2x | 2x | – | |
Rear | 1x | 1x | – | |
Liquid Cooling | 120 mm radiator | 140 mm radiator | ||
Front | Up to 240 | – | ||
Top | Up to 240 | Up to 280 | ||
Rear | 120 | 140 | ||
Clearance | ||||
Graphics card | 330 mm (13 in) | |||
CPU cooler | 200 mm (7.9 in) | |||
Cable Management | 28 mm (1.1 in) | |||
Radiator (Top) | 120 mm form factor: 74 mm (2.9 in) 140 mm form factor: 54 mm (2.1 in) | |||
Packaging Information | ||||
Package Dimension | 310 mm x 480 mm x 460 mm (WxHxD) 12.2 in x 18,9 in x 18.1 in | |||
Net Weight | 5.4 kg (12 lbs) | |||
Gross Weight | 8 kg (17.7 lbs) | |||
Warranty | ||||
Length | 5 Years Limited |
EXTERIOR & SIDE PANELS
The Enthoo Evolv ITX is a steel case with a plastic front panel. Its dimensions are 23.0 cm x 37.5 cm x 39.5 mm or 9.1 in x 14.8 in x15.6 (W x H x D), for a total volume of 34 Liters. It’s fairly big for a mini-ITX case and in fact is larger than small microATX models.
|
|
|
|
|
INTERIOR
The interior has similarly thin construction to the side panels with the multipurpose bracket and radiator frame feeling particularly weak. The main drive cage on the otherhand is well secured and thick removable front panel is easily the best built component.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSEMBLY
The assembly process is similar to that of a typical larger tower, so it’s fairly uncomplicated. The interior is quite user friendly with plenty of room behind the motherboard tray, cable management features, rolled edges, and removable brackets/trays to make drive/radiator installation less of a hassle in the small space provided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TESTING
System Configuration:
- Intel Core i5-4690K processor – 3.4 GHz (3.8 GHz with Turbo Boost), 22nm, 84W
- Scythe Kotetsu CPU
cooler - ASUS Z97I-PLUS
motherboard – Intel Z97 chipset, mini-ITX - ASUS Strix GeForce GTX 980 graphics card – 2048 CUDA cores, 1178 MHz clock (1279 MHz with GPU Boost), 7010 MHz memory
- Kingston HyperX Genesis memory – 2x4GB, DDR3-1600, C10
- Seagate Desktop SSHD hybrid drive – 2TB, 7200 RPM, 8GB NAND Flash, SATA 6 Gbps
- Cooler Master
Silent Pro M700 power supply – 700W, modular, ATX - Microsoft
Windows 7 Ultimate operating system, 64-bit
Measurement and Analysis Tools
- Prime95
processor stress software. - FurMark
stability test to stress the integrated GPU. - Asus GPU Tweak to monitor GPU temperatures and adjust fan speeds.
- SpeedFan
to monitor system temperatures and adjust system fan speeds. - Extech 380803 AC power analyzer / data logger for measuring AC system
power. - PC-based spectrum analyzer:
SpectraPlus with ACO Pacific mic and M-Audio digitalaudio interfaces. - Anechoic chamber
with ambient level of 11 dBA or lower
Testing Procedures
The system is placed in two states: idle, and load using Prime95 (2/4 instances, large FFTs setting) and FurMark, an OpenGL
benchmarking and stability testing utility. This puts more demand on the CPU and GPU than any real life application. Throughout testing, system temperatures, noise levels, and power consumption are recorded. During the load test, the system and GPU fans speeds are adjusted to various levels in an attempt to find an optimal balance between cooling and noise while maintaining a GPU temperature of 85°C (at an ambient temperature of 22°C).
Baseline Noise
For our baseline noise tests, the system is left idle, the CPU fan is set to its minimum speed under PWM control (630 RPM), and the GPU fans are off by default. The system fan(s) are connected to controllable fan header(s) and are set to a variety of speeds using SpeedFan. This gives us a good idea of what the stock fan(s) sound like at different speeds with minimal interference from other sources.
Baseline Noise Level (Idle, CPU fan at 400 RPM, GPU fans off) | ||
Setting | Fan Speed | SPL @1m |
0% | N/A | 15 dBA |
40% | 380 RPM | 15~16 dBA |
60% | 520 RPM | 18 dBA |
80% | 620 RPM | 22 dBA |
100% | 720 RPM | 25 dBA |
Measuring mic positioned 1m at diagonal angle left/front of case. Ambient noise level: 10~11 [email protected]. |
The 200 mm fan that ships with the Evolv ITX is a retail model from Phanteks, the PH-F200SP, which retails for US$20 on its own. It’s a gentle giant though, with a rated speed of just 800 RPM while our sample spins slightly above 700 RPM. At full speed, the noise level tops out at a moderately loud 25 [email protected]; users looking for a quiet experience should dial it down to around 600 RPM or lower. The fan has a standard 3-pin connector and is rated for only 0.25A (for a maximum of 3W) so it’s safe to use with motherboard fan control.
The stock fan uses a similar design to the PH-F140TS, which ships with some of Phanteks’ heatsinks. It also happens to be my personal favorite 140 mm fan both in terms of performance and acoustics. I’m happy to report this larger variant is every bit its equal, with a pleasantly smooth broad profile and completely lacking in tonality throughout its range. It’s easily the best sounding oversized fan I’ve ever encountered.
Most cases have vibration issues with our 7200 RPM SSHD, but it’s a complete non-factor in the Evolv ITX. The drive is held fairly securely and the tray snaps solidly into place into the drive cage. There is a small peak at 120 Hz caused by the drive’s motor, but the amplitude is so low, it’s not audible.
TEST RESULTS
System Measurements (85°C Target GPU Temp) | ||||
System State | Idle | Prime95x2 + FurMark | ||
CPU Fan Speed | 630 RPM (Min) | 900 RPM (45%) | ||
System Fan Speed | 380 RPM (40%) | 520 RPM (60%) | 620 PM (80%) | 720 RPM (100%) |
GPU Fan Speed* | Off | 1820 RPM (58%) | 1670 RPM (54%) | 1670 RPM (54%) |
CPU Temp | 35°C | 60°C | 57°C | 57°C |
MB Temp | 35°C | 58°C | 58°C | 57°C |
SSHD Temp | 34°C | 35°C | 34°C | 34°C |
GPU Temp | 41°C | 85°C | 85°C | 85°C |
System Power (AC) | 52W | 307W | 308W | 308W |
15~16 dBA | 30 dBA | 29 dBA | 29~30 dBA | |
*set as low as possible to maintain target GPU temperature on load. Ambient temperature: 22°C. |
The results of our initial load tests are fairly discouraging. No matter what speed the system fan is set to, a high video card fan speed is required to keep the GPU at a modest 85°C, resulting in loud operation between 29 and 30 [email protected]. What’s more, after a certain point, increasing the speed of the front fan no longer improves performance. The level of cooling at the 80% and 100% settings are virtually identical.
The video card fans’ contribution to the overall system noise drowns out the system fan and its agreeable sound quality, giving the system a harsher, higher pitched profile with a few tonal peaks emerging at various points between 600 and 1000 Hz.
System Measurements: Prime95x2 + FurMark (85°C GPU Temp) | |||||
Modification | stock | CPU fan set to 100% | front filter removed | front panel removed | SSHD moved up one position |
GPU Fan Speed* | 1670 RPM (54%) | 1410 RPM (48%) | 1560 RPM (51%) | 1130 RPM (42%) | 2090 RPM (65%) |
CPU Temp | 57°C | 50°C | 53°C | 49°C | 57°C |
MB Temp | 58°C | 48°C | 50°C | 46°C | 56°C |
SSHD Temp | 34°C | 31°C | 31°C | 31°C | 37°C |
System Power (AC) | 308W | 306W | 307W | 305W | 310W |
29 dBA | 29 dBA | 28 dBA | 25~26 dBA | 33 dBA | |
*set as low as possible to maintain target GPU temperature on load. System fan set to 80%, CPU fan set to 45% (unless otherwise noted). Ambient temperature: 22°C. |
With the 80% system speed setting achieving the best results, that was used as the starting point for analyzing the Evolv ITX’s performance problems. The first thing I tried was setting the CPU fan to 100%, even though the level of CPU cooling seemed adequate during the initial testing phase. This definitely helped alleviate some of the thermal stress as the fan blows toward the rear, effectively acting as an exhaust fan. The system ran cool enough that I was able to slow the GPU fans by 260 RPM, but unfortunately the noise level stayed about the same as the faster spinning CPU fan was loud enough to offset the difference. A proper dedicated exhaust fan at a lower speed would be more efficient.
A restrictive filter is often a factor in limiting performance and this was true of the Evolv ITX. Taking it out allowed more fresh air in, and while it didn’t make as much of a cooling difference as increasing the CPU fan speed, it did result in a small net noise reduction. Pulling the front panel off had the greatest effect on temperatures, so much so that the GPU fans could be slowed by 540 RPM compared to stock. This left the fan more exposed to our mic, but it still produced a tremendous overall noise savings, bringing the rig down to a more tolerable 25~26 [email protected].
Predictably, inadequate of intake is clearly the limiting factor and it’s so critical that even moving the hard drive has serious consequences. Positioning the drive in the upper tray (but still below the PSU “tunnel”) seems like a choice many users would make as it gives the drive a bit of airflow from the front fan. However, this also slightly decreases how much fresh air gets to the GPU, both by directly impeding the fan, and by reducing the amount of physical clearance underneath the card. This small change wreaked havoc on the system, forcing the GPU fans to increase to over 2000 RPM to maintain the same temperature, driving up the noise level by a substantial 4 dB.
Case Comparison: Prime95x2 + FurMark (85°C GPU Temp) | |||
Case | Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ITX | Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ITX (filter removed) | BitFenix Prodigy Black |
CPU Heatsink/Fan | Scythe Kotetsu at 900 RPM | Scythe Mugen Max at 500 RPM | |
System Fan Speed | 630 RPM (1 x 80%) | 500 RPM (2 x 60%) | |
GPU Fan Speed* | 1670 RPM | 1560 RPM | 880 RPM |
CPU Temp | 57°C | 53°C | 55°C |
MB Temp | 58°C | 50°C | 50°C |
29 dBA | 28 dBA | 20~21 dBA | |
*set as low as possible to maintain target GPU temperature. Ambient temperature: 22°C. |
Our test system is similar to the Mini-ITX Gaming Build I assembled last winter using the BitFenix Prodigy. The CPU cooler and power supply are different and an M.2 SSD was used instead of a hybrid SATA drive, but none of these changes are significant enough to make a direct comparison unfair. For that build, we chose the black version of the Prodigy because it has a more open front panel than the other color variants.
The Prodigy build maintained the same GPU temperature on load with the CPU fan and two 120 mm system fans spinning at only 500 RPM. The Prodigy also achieved this result with GPU fan speeds of just 880 RPM, almost half that of the Evolv ITX. The resulting 7~8 dB difference is enormous considering the logarithmic nature of the decibel scale.
AUDIO RECORDINGS
These recordings were made with a high resolution, lab quality, digital recording
system inside SPCR’s own 11 dBA ambient anechoic chamber, then converted to
LAME 128kbps encoded MP3s. We’ve listened long and hard to ensure there is no
audible degradation from the original WAV files to these MP3s. They represent
a quick snapshot of what we heard during the review.
Each recording starts with ambient noise, then 5~10 second segments of product
at various states. For the most realistic results,
set the volume so that the starting ambient level is just barely audible, then
don’t change the volume setting again while comparing all the sound files.
- SPCR Mini-ITX Test System in Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ITX – Baseline (idle, CPU at 630 RPM, GPU fans off)
— system fan off (15 [email protected])
— system fan at 40% (15~16 [email protected])
— system fan at 60% (18 [email protected])
— system fan at 80% (22 [email protected])
— system fan at 100% (25 [email protected])
- SPCR Mini-ITX Test System in Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ITX
— idle, CPU fan at 630 RPM, system fan at 40%, GPU fans off (15~16 [email protected])
— Prime95x2 + FurMark, CPU fan at 900 RPM, system fan at 80%, GPU fans at 51%, filter removed (28 [email protected])
— Prime95x2 + FurMark, CPU fan at 900 RPM, system fan at 80%, GPU fans at 54% (29 [email protected])
FINAL THOUGHTS
The Enthoo Evolv ITX is an attempt by Phanteks at a budget mini-ITX tower for enthusiasts but it sadly can’t provide enough airflow to succeed. The front panel allows fresh air to enter through moderately-sized slits on the sides but it’s simply not enough. As a result, the giant fan, which could have been a killer feature, is crippled. With the system starved for airflow, our GTX 980 had to run at fairly high fan speeds to keep it adequately cooled on load. I can only imagine how a more power hungry 250W+ card would fare under the same conditions. An exhaust fan would certainly help but the fact a single 200 mm fan isn’t sufficient is indicative of a critically flawed design. Ventilation is such a problem that even moving a hard drive an inch closer to the underside of the video card caused a substantial cooling deficit.
Appeasing watercooling aficionados seems to a big part of the Evolv ITX’s strategy with heavy emphasis placed on the mounting options provided for a pump and reservoir, along with a clever offset 120~280 mm radiator placement on to the ceiling that makes it more compatible with thicker variants. However, the exhaust points on the top of the case are just as restrictive, if not more so, than the front panel, hampering this capability. The top panel only has a handful of thin slits along the sides and a modest sized grill at the back. It should also be noted that if you install a custom loop, 3.5 inch drive support is lost as they use the same mounting positions.
Overshadowed by airflow problems are a few redeeming features. The 3.5 inch drive mounting system in the PSU compartment is excellent with fairly secure drive trays snapping tightly into place in a solidly constructed drive cage. Hard drive vibration effects are effectively nonexistent, which is rare to see in a tower of any size. The 200 mm fan has the same sublime acoustics as its smaller brethren and is easily the best sounding big fan my ears have encountered. And finally, the combination of the spacious right side along with the included velcro straps makes cable management a breeze, something that is usually a problem in mini-ITX cases.
Overall, the Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ITX reminds me a lot of the NZXT H440, a seemingly well put-together tower that sacrifices too much airflow in favor of a more solid, less ventilated exterior. However, the H440 uses the larger ATX form factor which is more forgiving. Within the more cramped confines of a mini-ITX tower, it’s a game of inches where every mistake is amplified. And while sacrificing some performance or functionality to achieve a certain aesthetic is OK, the Evolv ITX’s plain looks aren’t worth any sort of compromise, IMO.
Our thanks to Phanteks
for the Enthoo Evolv ITX case sample.
* * *
Articles of Related Interest
Fractal Design Define S Tower Case
Zalman Z11 Neo ATX Case
Corsair Carbide 500R Performance Midtower
BitFenix Pandora MicroATX Case
Be Quiet! Silent Base 800 ATX Tower
Cooler Master Silencio 652S Tower Case
* * *