Modern Phrases That Confuse Me
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Undisclosed but sober in US
Modern Phrases That Confuse Me
I'm sure you've heard at least some of these, usually from the TV. For some reason redundancy makes something more impressive, does it?
1. A new discovery! - As opposed to an old discovery, or as opposed to a new same-old-thing? Why new and discovery? Perhaps it's "more complete" that way?
2. More complete! - Ah yes, of course. I used to think of "complete" like being pregnant. You either are or you are not. There is no "little bit pregnant." I could continue, but some might think my long windedness might be more complete, and we can't have that.
3. The more you spend the more you save! - The first time I heard this I couldn't believe someone even put these words together in this manner. The instant response was "Really? So I'll be rich when I'm broke?" I suppose using a credit card may make me "more broke?" Or should that be "more rich?" Sounds too much like more complete to me.
Add your own gems and we can make the list most complete.
1. A new discovery! - As opposed to an old discovery, or as opposed to a new same-old-thing? Why new and discovery? Perhaps it's "more complete" that way?
2. More complete! - Ah yes, of course. I used to think of "complete" like being pregnant. You either are or you are not. There is no "little bit pregnant." I could continue, but some might think my long windedness might be more complete, and we can't have that.
3. The more you spend the more you save! - The first time I heard this I couldn't believe someone even put these words together in this manner. The instant response was "Really? So I'll be rich when I'm broke?" I suppose using a credit card may make me "more broke?" Or should that be "more rich?" Sounds too much like more complete to me.
Add your own gems and we can make the list most complete.
Re: Modern Phrases That Confuse Me
Some of these can actually make sense...
Now to some of my pet peeves:
LCD display - The D in LCD stands for "display"!
... and in the same manner...
PC computer
Cheers
Olle
I suppose so. This discovery wasn't made decades ago, but recently!aristide1 wrote:1. A new discovery! - As opposed to an old discovery, ...?
Exactly! More complete is useful when laying a jigsaw puzzle. After finishing 20% of it it's a little complete. With 40% of the pieces in place it's more complete. Not until all pieces are in place it's just "complete".aristide1 wrote:2. More complete! - Ah yes, of course. I used to think of "complete" like being pregnant. You either are or you are not.
Now to some of my pet peeves:
LCD display - The D in LCD stands for "display"!
... and in the same manner...
PC computer
Cheers
Olle
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Undisclosed but sober in US
The last person I corrected that mistake was an elementary grade english teacher. Go figure.GamingGod wrote:...The saying is "I couldn't care less"....
Oh you know when I need to communicate with someone I call or email or just talk. I don't "reach out".
Of course there are people who say "That's what I'm talking about....", even when they weren't talking to begin with.
And just for clarity, when one is smacked upside the head, that's the top right? And I'm curious, what's the middle part called these days?
"Sounds like a plan." Sorry no, just a passing thought. Going for ice cream doesn't require planning, unless you been hit upside the head too many times. That's what I'm talking about.
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 8:37 pm
- Location: Mississauga, ON
- Contact:
omg... i hate that one. and all the other corporate doublespeak people throw around the office... here are some other office catch phrases that might sap away your faith in humanity...yefi wrote:"Touching base" may not confuse me, but it sure does send a shiver up my back when it's suggested to me.
going forward - i caught myself using this the other day... barf...
as per - apparently is also grammatically incorrect as well as annoying
knowledge transfer - the idiocy of this is beyond words...
i can't think of any more right now, but i KNOW i'll hear at least a dozen more at my departmental meeting tomorrow... hey, i'll make a point to take notes on corporate jargon that annoys me.. maybe it'll help me stay awake.
May I suggest a game of Bullshit Bingo to make things a bit livelier?mr. poopyhead wrote: i can't think of any more right now, but i KNOW i'll hear at least a dozen more at my departmental meeting tomorrow... hey, i'll make a point to take notes on corporate jargon that annoys me.. maybe it'll help me stay awake.
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 8:37 pm
- Location: Mississauga, ON
- Contact:
HAHAHA.. that is awesome!!! i wish i had seen this post before the productivity-sapping meeting i sat through for 6 hours today...nick705 wrote:May I suggest a game of Bullshit Bingo to make things a bit livelier?
one word that i heard at LEAST 10x today just vaulted itself to the top on my list of most hated corporate weasel words...
actionable... what a silly bit of tripe...
-
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:25 pm
- Location: Finland
I'm guessing that fail came from the general laziness that created leet and epic is just gross hyperbole.
I think going forward isn't always bad, just when it is horribly used in the corporate world. There are legitimate times to use going forward.
With more complete, what if you had something that was complete at the time, but you found more things to add to it? The new version would also be complete, but it would have more stuff in it. Or... what if you had a collection of the Beetles #1 hits...
Complete: All of the songs that were #1 in the US
More complete: All of the songs that were #1 anywhere
Most complete: All of the songs that were #1 anywhere with live and foreign language versions.
I don't know, I am really digging on this one...
I think going forward isn't always bad, just when it is horribly used in the corporate world. There are legitimate times to use going forward.
With more complete, what if you had something that was complete at the time, but you found more things to add to it? The new version would also be complete, but it would have more stuff in it. Or... what if you had a collection of the Beetles #1 hits...
Complete: All of the songs that were #1 in the US
More complete: All of the songs that were #1 anywhere
Most complete: All of the songs that were #1 anywhere with live and foreign language versions.
I don't know, I am really digging on this one...
This one is Dutch; but it does annoy the living daylights out of me..
'Naar de bevolking toe"
Which means 'moving to the population'. Now, given the geographical spread of any population, it's a very odd phrase to use correctly. Belgium does not have an 'air force one' that can move towards the population.
Politicians use this however to render some sort of vague 'cloud' of responsibilities and dependances, which translates somewhat as "in response to the demands expressed by the poopulation."
'We have responsabilities moving to the population'
'..supposes no protective action moving to the population'
'it's not fair to remain silent about this moving to the population'
'it's a service moving to the population'
...
Aaaaargh!
'Naar de bevolking toe"
Which means 'moving to the population'. Now, given the geographical spread of any population, it's a very odd phrase to use correctly. Belgium does not have an 'air force one' that can move towards the population.
Politicians use this however to render some sort of vague 'cloud' of responsibilities and dependances, which translates somewhat as "in response to the demands expressed by the poopulation."
'We have responsabilities moving to the population'
'..supposes no protective action moving to the population'
'it's not fair to remain silent about this moving to the population'
'it's a service moving to the population'
...
Aaaaargh!
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:39 am
- Location: England
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:22 pm
- Location: Sunny Florida, where dead people vote 3 times in a county they never even lived in!
How about "went missing," a current pet peeve of mine. These days some rotten little brat does not simply "disappear," he "goes missing." UGH. I wish the reporters and news people that use this would simply disappear. Preferably in the most painful manner possible.
Being "Proactive." A business-school invented catch phrase (there are literally hundreds of these, they all irritate me) for simply anticipating something and acting accordingly.
"The next level," see business-school catch phrase rant, above. An exceptionally vague and asinine phrase. Usually only serves to identify the speaker or writer as an idiot and manipulator of colossal magnitude.
Being "Proactive." A business-school invented catch phrase (there are literally hundreds of these, they all irritate me) for simply anticipating something and acting accordingly.
"The next level," see business-school catch phrase rant, above. An exceptionally vague and asinine phrase. Usually only serves to identify the speaker or writer as an idiot and manipulator of colossal magnitude.
How exactly do you propose we say we don't know where someone or something has gone since the last time we had seen them?
Disappeared doesn't work because they more than likely still exist and didn't vanish while you were watching them.
Lost doesn't work because you don't have to be lost to be missing; you could have simply decided to leave.
I guess the best you could really do is "...has been missing since..." instead of "...went missing..."
Disappeared doesn't work because they more than likely still exist and didn't vanish while you were watching them.
Lost doesn't work because you don't have to be lost to be missing; you could have simply decided to leave.
I guess the best you could really do is "...has been missing since..." instead of "...went missing..."
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:22 pm
- Location: Sunny Florida, where dead people vote 3 times in a county they never even lived in!
Perhaps a more accurate description of what happened. Example: "The little, screaming brat was not where his mother left him when she returned for him at 3:00pm."Ch0z3n wrote:How exactly do you propose we say we don't know where someone or something has gone since the last time we had seen them?
Disappeared doesn't work because they more than likely still exist and didn't vanish while you were watching them.
Lost doesn't work because you don't have to be lost to be missing; you could have simply decided to leave.
I guess the best you could really do is "...has been missing since..." instead of "...went missing..."
This whole "went (has gone, etc.) missing" nonsense is fairly new. I don't recall hearing it prior to, say, 2000. Certainly, for most of my 53 years, reporters were quite content to use the term "disappeared." Example: "When his mother returned at 3:00pm, the little brat had disappeared. The neighbors rejoyced."
The first definition of "disappear," in the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition, is "To pass out of sight, vanish." Further, to quote from the "Synonyms" section for "disappear:" The central meaning of these words is "to pass out of sight or existance."" An example the editors give is "A skyscraper disappearing in the fog." A skyscraper vanishing in the fog certainly does not cease to exist, and there seems to be no requirement for an observer from which it disappears. There is an implication that IF an observer was present that observer would notice the skyscraper disappearing from view.
What I am saying is that "disappear" works very well, and it is a much cleaner way of stating it than the horribly awkward "gone (went, etc.) missing."
And, for what it is worth, the phrase "went missing" is grammatically correct. The verb "go," of which "went" is the past tense can be used to describe a change of state: "My hair went grey several years ago." Really, it did. Started to go grey when I was in my mid-twenties. See how well it works. And "missing" is a change of state, so it can be used with "go." But it is awkward and sounds stilted. The stilted sound or construction of "go missing," is emphasized by the, usually, very casual style of writing for news reporting in which the phrase is set. In that context, "disappeared" simply flows better, is not inaccurate, and sounds much better.
No, the skyscraper isn't going out of existence, just sight; they are two different definitions.
It seems to me it would be more correct to use disappeared if the little brat is the one that left and went missing if you left and when you came back the little brat wasn't there anymore.
Just because you can't see them anymore doesn't mean they've gone anywhere. If they are still where they were they aren't missing; though you might have lost them.
It seems to me it would be more correct to use disappeared if the little brat is the one that left and went missing if you left and when you came back the little brat wasn't there anymore.
Just because you can't see them anymore doesn't mean they've gone anywhere. If they are still where they were they aren't missing; though you might have lost them.
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:39 am
- Location: England
"Missing" means "can not be found".
That seems to me to be an acceptable word to use when a brat (otherwise known as someones child, that they probably love more than anything else in the world) cannot be found.
Disappeared means that something goes out of view - the opposite to appear.
Vanished means that something goes away, permanently - like washing out a stain on your shirt.
The English language is wonderful in that it has so many words that describe very similar things, but those words have subtly different meanings and are often misused. People generally understand what you mean, given the context, and it's really not worth making a fuss about it.
That seems to me to be an acceptable word to use when a brat (otherwise known as someones child, that they probably love more than anything else in the world) cannot be found.
Disappeared means that something goes out of view - the opposite to appear.
Vanished means that something goes away, permanently - like washing out a stain on your shirt.
The English language is wonderful in that it has so many words that describe very similar things, but those words have subtly different meanings and are often misused. People generally understand what you mean, given the context, and it's really not worth making a fuss about it.
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:22 pm
- Location: Sunny Florida, where dead people vote 3 times in a county they never even lived in!
Exactly, Judge, exactly.
What gets me riled up is the way that "gone missing," issuing breathlessly and enthusiastically from the mouths of reporters, has become a way of their showing off how trendy and cool they are. Or some social strutting thing like that. At least over here, "gone missing" became a trend in the last five years or so. Kind of like "Look at me, I can use the latest, coolest phrases, and I'm so cool." thing from the usually hyperactive, overexcited (about themselves and their meaningless and annoying reporting) reporters.
Several years ago, the same sort of trend started with the phrase "A decision has been taken." Note that it is passive, and the, at the time, unusual (for the US) use of "taken" instead of "made." The spokesman for President Bush Sr. (1989-1993) used it, then everyone else had to get in on the Oh, SOooo Cool action. Before that, a simple "He has made a decision," or better yet, "He has made up his mind" would have done.
What gets me riled up is the way that "gone missing," issuing breathlessly and enthusiastically from the mouths of reporters, has become a way of their showing off how trendy and cool they are. Or some social strutting thing like that. At least over here, "gone missing" became a trend in the last five years or so. Kind of like "Look at me, I can use the latest, coolest phrases, and I'm so cool." thing from the usually hyperactive, overexcited (about themselves and their meaningless and annoying reporting) reporters.
Several years ago, the same sort of trend started with the phrase "A decision has been taken." Note that it is passive, and the, at the time, unusual (for the US) use of "taken" instead of "made." The spokesman for President Bush Sr. (1989-1993) used it, then everyone else had to get in on the Oh, SOooo Cool action. Before that, a simple "He has made a decision," or better yet, "He has made up his mind" would have done.
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Undisclosed but sober in US
Well if we're going to address improper words there are:
Base - The base from my subwoofer is awesome. Really? How's the rest of it's physical structure?
Quite - I want a pc that's quite. Uh, quite what?
I believe these mistakes have devloped from that english teacher I mentioned before; the one who could care less, and seems to work really hard at that very aspect.
Base - The base from my subwoofer is awesome. Really? How's the rest of it's physical structure?
Quite - I want a pc that's quite. Uh, quite what?
I believe these mistakes have devloped from that english teacher I mentioned before; the one who could care less, and seems to work really hard at that very aspect.
-
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:22 pm
- Location: Sunny Florida, where dead people vote 3 times in a county they never even lived in!
No, meaning an overindulged little piece of excrement that likely needs the living daylights slapped -- Oh, my, I seem to be in an unusually cranky mood today. Well, most kids, at least here in the US, certainly DO fit my description and opinion, as expressed above.judge56988 wrote:a brat (otherwise known as someones child, that they probably love more than anything else in the world)
But, the gripe with the phrase "gone [went, etc.] missing" remains whether applied to brats, adults (physically big brats, usually), or objects.
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Undisclosed but sober in US
Agreed, your mood doesn't alter the accuracy of your statement.N7SC wrote:No, meaning an overindulged little piece of excrement that likely needs the living daylights slapped -- Oh, my, I seem to be in an unusually cranky mood today. Well, most kids, at least here in the US, certainly DO fit my description and opinion, as expressed above.
And one of these brats will one day be president.