i5-750 and HD4350. Will picoPSU 160 XT cut it?

Got a shopping cart of parts that you want opinions on? Get advice from members on your planned or existing system (or upgrade).

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
stefan534
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Aus

i5-750 and HD4350. Will picoPSU 160 XT cut it?

Post by stefan534 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:12 am

This will be an audio workstation pc, not for gaming.
Possibility to watch movies on it.
May be CPU intensive at times...but probably not GPU

Full specs are expected to be:

i5-750
HD4350
One SSHD and green 500gig Sata
One slim optical drive
An external audio interface from USB (it's an external sound card basically)

probably inside a modded Silverstone SUGO case, if I can...


I've got a lot of conflicting info/reviews about power requirements for the i5-750. They seem lower than most cpus, but still quite high in reviews, perhaps because most of the reviews involve gaming rigs.

Be interested in any opinions, cheers

ilovejedd
Posts: 676
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:14 pm
Location: in the depths of hell

Post by ilovejedd » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:41 am

Very low idle power, but I think CPU at load might be close to pushing the Pico to its limits. My i7-860+GT240+Momentus 5400.6 500GB build using an Antec EA380-D idles at 56~58W but went up to 180W during OCCT:Linpack. That figures to 144W DC at 80% efficiency. Then again, Linpack is unusually CPU intensive. I consistently get higher wattage with Linpack than with Prime95.

ntavlas
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:35 pm
Location: Greece
Contact:

Post by ntavlas » Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:48 am

An i7 750 + hd4350 should draw a little less power than lovejedd`s rig. My guesstimate would be about 130 watts dc. This is still close to the 160xt`s max rating but on the other hand, doesn`t the pico psu just pass through the 12v line? In this case the max rating just reflects the limitation of the barrel type connector connecting the power brick to the pico psu.

stefan534
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Aus

Post by stefan534 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:56 pm

Thanks for the input. Sounds like I'll be pushing the threshold. I may undervolt and underclock as much as I can..

stefan534
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Aus

Post by stefan534 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:58 pm

Seems to fit in with other systems: these are a variety of results with higher end video cards. Mind you, I think these tests are just cpu intensive, so hopefully its the graphics cards that consume a bit, even when idle.


Image



http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image ... ei7_78.jpg
http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/image ... ei7_79.jpg




http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/inte ... /19912.png
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/inte ... /19913.png

JamieG
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 10:31 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by JamieG » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:52 pm

Well, to start with, you might want to look at SPCR's review of the i5 750.

In short, with 2x2GB of DDR3 memory (1333 MHz, 9-9-9-24-1T timings), a GeForce 9400GT graphics card, WD VelociRaptor hard drive and an OEM Seasonic power supply and Turbo Boost disabled, full CPU load is 130W (110W when undervolted).

Sounds like you would be pushing the limit of a picoPSU. Undervolting would probably be necessary to be on the safe side.

stefan534
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Aus

Post by stefan534 » Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:47 am

Thanks mate, I might undervolt to be on the safe side.

Post Reply