Newbie question - 950 PRO M.2 on an MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX AC
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
Newbie question - 950 PRO M.2 on an MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX AC
I understand that my MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX AC only supports an M.2 speed of "PCIe 2.0 2x" but the Samsung 950 Pro I am considering support "PCIe 3.0 4x." Assuming that it [the 950 Pro] is backwards compatible, I have two questions about using it on this motherboard:
1) Will the 950 Pro physically fit in the board's M.2 connector (ie are 2.0 2x and 3.0 4x physically identical)?
2) Has anyone published some data comparing the drive's speeds at 2.0 2x vs 3.0 4x?
I am currently using an Samsung 840 Pro connected via the SATA port. Thanks!
1) Will the 950 Pro physically fit in the board's M.2 connector (ie are 2.0 2x and 3.0 4x physically identical)?
2) Has anyone published some data comparing the drive's speeds at 2.0 2x vs 3.0 4x?
I am currently using an Samsung 840 Pro connected via the SATA port. Thanks!
-
- Posts: 5275
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: ITALY
Re: Newbie question - 950 PRO M.2 on an MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX A
graysky wrote:1) Will the 950 Pro physically fit in the board's M.2 connector (ie are 2.0 2x and 3.0 4x physically identical)?
Providing it's a rightly keyed connector, yes.
graysky wrote:2) Has anyone published some data comparing the drive's speeds at 2.0 2x vs 3.0 4x?
AFAIK no, something has been written about (though you've to dig into the net): "...a M.2 drive using PCI-E 2.0 x2 only has a 25% potential speed increase over SATA III..." (so about five times slower than PCIe 3.0 4x)
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 2269
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 9:09 am
- Location: Northern California.
Re: Newbie question - 950 PRO M.2 on an MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX A
it will work. but you wont "feel" any actual performance increase over the 840.graysky wrote: I am currently using an Samsung 840 Pro connected via the SATA port. Thanks!
Re: Newbie question - 950 PRO M.2 on an MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX A
In some cases, like cold booting, you might even feel a downgrade, in some motherboards it takes time to initialize the M.2 drives, kinda like it takes on servers to initialize the HBAs, so it adds 5 to 10 sec extra to the boot up, this is avoided on sata drives, thats not to say its not a faster drive, it is, and if you use a lot of sequentials (that not many of us do) then you will feel a big ugprade, but the usual day to day tasks, the responsiveness of an ssd is given by even a sata II ssd, i cant tell the difference between my Intel X25m, Samsung 840pro, Samsung 850pro.
By my comments, im not trying to discourage you into going in a 950pro, by far the fastest drive in the market, just for the average user, its not needed over a good ssd as you already have, i bought my 850pro over 950pro, mostly because i need more space, and since i didnt have any short plans on going m.2 i decided was a worth investment, once m.2 starting going over 1tb i might consider them for a main drive.
Im considering buying one, but more for editing where the sequentials will be a good upgrade over whats available on sata III.
By my comments, im not trying to discourage you into going in a 950pro, by far the fastest drive in the market, just for the average user, its not needed over a good ssd as you already have, i bought my 850pro over 950pro, mostly because i need more space, and since i didnt have any short plans on going m.2 i decided was a worth investment, once m.2 starting going over 1tb i might consider them for a main drive.
Im considering buying one, but more for editing where the sequentials will be a good upgrade over whats available on sata III.
Re: Newbie question - 950 PRO M.2 on an MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX A
Thanks for the link and info. Looks like it would be a waste without PCIe 3.0 4x.
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 2269
- Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 9:09 am
- Location: Northern California.
Re: Newbie question - 950 PRO M.2 on an MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX A
personally i found it to be a waste even with 3.0 4x.graysky wrote:Thanks for the link and info. Looks like it would be a waste without PCIe 3.0 4x.
these are meant to be enterprise drives, with tons users/apps accessing the drive at the same time. desktop users dont do enough simultaneous reads/writes for NVMe drives to really shine.
-
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 12:44 pm
- Location: Seattle
Re: Newbie question - 950 PRO M.2 on an MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX A
There are M.2 adapters that go in PCIe x4 expansion slots, perhaps that would work for you?graysky wrote:Thanks for the link and info. Looks like it would be a waste without PCIe 3.0 4x.
-
- Posts: 5275
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: ITALY
Re: Newbie question - 950 PRO M.2 on an MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX A
There's a chance that cold booting is rather unsatisfactory that way.Fire-Flare wrote:There are M.2 adapters that go in PCIe x4 expansion slots, perhaps that would work for you?
-
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 12:44 pm
- Location: Seattle
Re: Newbie question - 950 PRO M.2 on an MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX A
Would it be any worse than waiting for a raid array to initiate?quest_for_silence wrote:There's a chance that cold booting is rather unsatisfactory that way.Fire-Flare wrote:There are M.2 adapters that go in PCIe x4 expansion slots, perhaps that would work for you?
-
- Posts: 5275
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: ITALY
Re: Newbie question - 950 PRO M.2 on an MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX A
Fire-Flare wrote:Would it be any worse than waiting for a raid array to initiate?
I wouldn't be able to say: http://www.silentpcreview.com/article1501-page4.html
On the other hand, the OP didn't say he run a raid array.
Re: Newbie question - 950 PRO M.2 on an MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX A
I did find http://ableconn.com/support_1.php?gid=62 for $22 so I might try it out. Thanks for the suggestion.Fire-Flare wrote:There are M.2 adapters that go in PCIe x4 expansion slots, perhaps that would work for you?graysky wrote:Thanks for the link and info. Looks like it would be a waste without PCIe 3.0 4x.
Re: Newbie question - 950 PRO M.2 on an MSI Z97 MPOWER MAX A
So I just received that particular adapter and it works with the current Linux kernel completely transparently. Any of you guys in here running Linux and would be willing to post a benchmark with the hardware?
EDIT: I posted a new thread here with the request to keep this thread clean. Thanks!
EDIT: I posted a new thread here with the request to keep this thread clean. Thanks!