and to make matters worse:
http://www.pccooler.cn/product/images/e ... _42cu.html
They were too lazy to figure out how to make it bigger (i.e., the 7700), and just decided "oh well, let's just slap on a huge fan
on top of the thing".
Stupid. Not to be racist (I am Chinese, mind you), but I am disappointed.
EDIT: Even the DIAGRAMS, backplates, nipples, and other parts are nearly IDENTICAL / copied based upon Zalman's design. Ugh. I mean, I HAVE seen 7000 impersonations, but to make exact or near-exact imitations right down to nearly every aspect of Zalman... ugh...
EDIT #2: We are also not the first to notice this. There is a news link with ZALMAN on it on the website, which seems to lead to
another site containing review/news of some sort, and from translating via BabelFish:
[ The IT168 evaluation ] the ultra frequency three (PCCooler) this sign relatively general consumers said that, without doubt is the very strange name, how well-known product and also is belongs to in the domestic not. But regarding the friend which makes the news media said that, this sign already was in domestic already has appeared, moreover in some very famous international IT website. Although present very many friends said this section product is the domestically produced goods, but this section product is in every sense of the term Chinese Taiwan product. But why do they on let the general consumers in the short time know? Actually the answer is in "the right infringement" in the question dispute, because ultra frequency three have two section main forces products and the international famous radiator brand ZALMAN two section main forces product, 7000ALCU and the 7000CU two section products are extremely similar, because of in a sense, this section product perhaps really is infringes upon the right the product. But certainly in not be technical and competition right infringement, but is in the contour and the appendix conflict.