Is that the original Solo suspension cords? That have not broken -- yet?dhanson865 wrote:
WD VelociRaptor: A Triple Crown
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact:
Re: MIKE CHIN ARE YOU LISTENING ????
WinXP on FAT32 or is there a way to offload the NTFS journal file?victorhortalives wrote:Strid wrote: 1. OS drive - Mtron 16GB (but without the journaling/page/temp files on this). Ubuntu & WinXp
2. Local Data Drive - Raptor 74GB. Local stuff + OS journaling/temp directories.
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:50 am
- Location: Xhystos
Re: MIKE CHIN ARE YOU LISTENING ????
I have no WinXP pagefile and all my WinXP Temp directories are on the RAM drive. Don't know about the XP journal file. There does seem to be some writes going on in XP that I can't move.jojo4u wrote:victorhortalives wrote:WinXP on FAT32 or is there a way to offload the NTFS journal file?Strid wrote: 1. OS drive - Mtron 16GB (but without the journaling/page/temp files on this). Ubuntu & WinXp
2. Local Data Drive - Raptor 74GB. Local stuff + OS journaling/temp directories.
Let me know if I can move anything else.
I have no common drives between WinXp and Ubuntu. If I want to move anything I use the NAS as a temp store.
For Ubuntu, both /tmp and /var are on the Raptor. PLUS the / is ext2 formatted - has to be on the Mtron. /tmp also ext2 but /var is ext3.
Re: MIKE CHIN ARE YOU LISTENING ????
About the NTFS metafile frenzy fetch Sysinternal's Process Monitor, watch file access and delete all default filters. Lot's of acesses to $LOGFILE and $MFT and so if I remember correctly (on Linux currently).victorhortalives wrote: Don't know about the XP journal file. There does seem to be some writes going on in XP that I can't move.
Let me know if I can move anything else.
About ext2 have a look at the noatime and nodiratime mount options.
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:50 am
- Location: Xhystos
Re: MIKE CHIN ARE YOU LISTENING ????
Already have noatime - no need for nodiratime (subset of noatime).jojo4u wrote:About the NTFS metafile frenzy fetch Sysinternal's Process Monitor, watch file access and delete all default filters. Lot's of acesses to $LOGFILE and $MFT and so if I remember correctly (on Linux currently).victorhortalives wrote: Don't know about the XP journal file. There does seem to be some writes going on in XP that I can't move.
Let me know if I can move anything else.
About ext2 have a look at the noatime and nodiratime mount options.
Thanks for the info re Sysinternal's Process Monitor. WinXp is now no more than 10% of my use - mainly iTunes and the odd game.
I hope the Bare Velociraptor fits the 2.5" Scythe enclosure with minimal modding. I'd then put the 2.5" Scythe into a 3.5" NoVibes. Heheh. Overkill, but why not?
I would like to know if the production Velociraptor will have some kind of "Void Warranty" sticker or something that would prevent one from removing the drive from the Icepack Noise Amplifier.
Because then I'd just wait for the OEM version to be available.
The Icepack is a completely boneheaded move on Western Digital's part.
I would like to know if the production Velociraptor will have some kind of "Void Warranty" sticker or something that would prevent one from removing the drive from the Icepack Noise Amplifier.
Because then I'd just wait for the OEM version to be available.
The Icepack is a completely boneheaded move on Western Digital's part.
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 9:46 pm
- Location: Bloomington, MN
MikeC: Can you give us some insight into why on earth does removing the enclosure make it quieter, and how is the situation affected when comparing those 2 ways when they are actually mounted to a case in any of the common ways?
I just don't do warranty-killing mods anymore and would really like to understand this better.
I just don't do warranty-killing mods anymore and would really like to understand this better.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12285
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
I haven't mounted the drive in a case, this is not normal tes procedure. But I can try it and report back.lm wrote:MikeC: Can you give us some insight into why on earth does removing the enclosure make it quieter, and how is the situation affected when comparing those 2 ways when they are actually mounted to a case in any of the common ways?
I just don't do warranty-killing mods anymore and would really like to understand this better.
The change in acoustics was explained briefly in the review. The close coupling of the HDD to the HS allows all the vibration to go into the HS -- literally, to "sink" into the aluminum frame. You may have noticed that vibration with the HDD in the frame is extremely low, the lowest we've ever seen. This is good in a way, but it also isn't good in another way -- the heatsink itself has lots of relatively unsupported parts: The ends of all the fins. Those ends are where the audible noise is coming from, AFAIK. I haven't experimented enough to know whether this is true. I can try sticking the whole HDD + frame into a NoVibes and see what the end result is... and maybe appiy pressure with the eraser end of a pencil on all the various parts to see which ones are actually making the resonating noise.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12285
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
OK, after another 45 mins of playing the with stuff, I've concluded that the entire aluminum frame ends up resonating at all frequencies, and there's no easy way to stop it once it starts. Higher pitches noises are especially bad -- the whole range 1.5~10kHz gets full of tonal peajs you can easily hear. I'll post those up into the main article later along with a new MP3 file -- no time right now. Putting the who thing into a novibes barely did anything. It needs to be inside one of Scythe's rubber boxes, methinks.
But take it off the frame and it's as smooth and sweet as a baby's cheek.
But take it off the frame and it's as smooth and sweet as a baby's cheek.
-
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 9:46 pm
- Location: Bloomington, MN
That is good news for me since the 2.5" NoVibes is nearly impossible to find for sale in the USA.MikeC wrote: Putting the who thing into a novibes barely did anything. It needs to be inside one of Scythe's rubber boxes, methinks.
But take it off the frame and it's as smooth and sweet as a baby's cheek.
Hoping it fits in the 2.5" Scythe Box. Then put the Scythe Box in the 3.5" NoVibes III.
So do I understand this correctly now: the heatsink is just badly designed and flimsy, resonating just at those frequencies that the drive generates the most? But wouldn't a regular computer case be much much worse yet for those resonations?MikeC wrote:the heatsink itself has lots of relatively unsupported parts: The ends of all the fins. Those ends are where the audible noise is coming from, AFAIK. I haven't experimented enough to know whether this is true. I can try sticking the whole HDD + frame into a NoVibes and see what the end result is... and maybe appiy pressure with the eraser end of a pencil on all the various parts to see which ones are actually making the resonating noise.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12285
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
It's not flimsy at all. It weighs 320g, more than the drive itself. But it does resonate.lm wrote:So do I understand this correctly now: the heatsink is just badly designed and flimsy, resonating just at those frequencies that the drive generates the most? But wouldn't a regular computer case be much much worse yet for those resonations?
Here's a screen capture of the freq spectrum w/ the drive in the frame:
Note the peaks centered at 700Hz, 1.5~2.2kHz, and 7kHz. These are all audible from a meter away.
Now here's the freq spectrum w/ the drive by itself:
Note all the reductions in the range 1.5~8kHz.
You can also hear this difference here in one MP3 recording -- 10 seconds with frame, 10 seconds without.
All this is now on page 3 of the article.
To repeat -- I could not subdue the additional noise of the frame with a NoVibes, or even with my two hands holding the drive+frame. (well mostly it was still there... just changed.)
In my opininon these SSD drives are coming very fast. Maybe next year the price will decrease to that level, when you consider buying a 16/32GB very fast SSD with 150MB/sec read/write, 0,1ms access time as system drive.KnightRT wrote:No doubt an impressive drive, but I'm having trouble getting worked up about hard disks when I see reviews for SSDs with sustained 120 MB/s transfer rates and essentially zero latency. They're expensive, and they have issues with small random writes, but these problems are rapidly disappearing. I'd be very surprised to see a new version of the Raptor after this one.
Relative to my 74 GB Raptor, the extra capacity means little to me. I have Windows and programs on that drive, segregated from the rest of my data that lives on a RAID array. A full install of XP and all the programs I've ever used takes about 15 GB; as an OS drive, the new Raptor is far beyond my needs. And as a data drive, it's too small. The only advantage is in latency, and I'd wager that the people who truly care about that use 15K SAS drives or SSDs. For lack of a compelling reason to buy this drive, I don't see the point.
An example configuration:
-16GB Mtron 2.5" SSD (now approx 300$)
-Storage hard disk like a 1TB Green Power (now approx 160-180$)
16/32GB SSD-s are enough for system drive in most cases so the only question is the price drop pattern of these drives next year.
Re: Xhystos
Thanks!Aris wrote:For all those wondering, but too lazy too click links. Its a belgium comic book series created by Schuiten & Peeters.victorhortalives wrote:Schuiten & Peeters : Cities of the ObscureMikeC wrote:<offtopic> victorhortalives -- So where's Xhystos? Is it related to Victor Horta?
http://www.urbicande.be/intro/default.php?page=8&lg=en
http://www.urbicande.be/carte.php#
http://dictionary.ebbs.net/english/epages/edict_xyz.htm
Still cannot justify it
I really wanted one of these drives, but when the time came to put my money where my mouth was, I picked up one of the new WD 640AAKS drives.
Is it really worth the money?
Is it really worth the money?
Mike: Thanks for the clarification. So to make it silent, I have to take it out of the frame and soft mount it? I mean, if the thing touches any metal even without the frame, it would be really bad right?
Are you talking back to WD about this issue? Maybe they fix it.
One other thing I don't understand:
How come the average latency can be so much worse? Isn't it supposed to be a linear function of the spindle speed?
Seek time tells you how long it takes for the drive head to move to the correct position, and then the latency tells how long it takes for the spindle to spin to the correct position afaik.
For every 10krpm drive it should therefore be 3ms average (half rotatation), 6ms max (full rotation)?
Are you talking back to WD about this issue? Maybe they fix it.
One other thing I don't understand:
How come the average latency can be so much worse? Isn't it supposed to be a linear function of the spindle speed?
Seek time tells you how long it takes for the drive head to move to the correct position, and then the latency tells how long it takes for the spindle to spin to the correct position afaik.
For every 10krpm drive it should therefore be 3ms average (half rotatation), 6ms max (full rotation)?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12285
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
regarding latency: I'm simply citing what's on WD's website. Their press briefing only highlights the improved seek times, doesn't mention latency. All the other specs appear to be substantially improved.lm wrote:Mike: Thanks for the clarification. So to make it silent, I have to take it out of the frame and soft mount it? I mean, if the thing touches any metal even without the frame, it would be really bad right?
Are you talking back to WD about this issue? Maybe they fix it.
One other thing I don't understand:
How come the average latency can be so much worse? Isn't it supposed to be a linear function of the spindle speed?
Seek time tells you how long it takes for the drive head to move to the correct position, and then the latency tells how long it takes for the spindle to spin to the correct position afaik.
For every 10krpm drive it should therefore be 3ms average (half rotatation), 6ms max (full rotation)?
I have been talking with WD, and forwarded all the info in that last post about the noise w/ and w/o the frame. The rep expressed great surprise, and the info has been forward to their engineers. We'll see if anything comes of it.
As for how best to use the WD -- that's certainly the way I'd use it, but you may be perfectly fine w/ it in the frame. Not everyone hears the same way...
Last edited by MikeC on Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
- Location: TN, USA
That picture is from http://www.silentpcreview.com/article272-page4.html Submitted by Mike Chin on Tue, 2005-10-11 so I don't think they'll ever break as they are frozen in time by the cameraNeilBlanchard wrote:Hello,
P150_review/notebookhdd.jpg
Is that the original Solo suspension cords? That have not broken -- yet?
I'm surprised you didn't notice the SPCR watermark on the image.
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:06 pm
- Location: New Hampshire, US
- Contact:
Mike,
Great review. I've always wanted to go 2.5'' to save space, especially now since I'm using an NSK1300, but I've been tentative to give up the quickness of a raptor drive. The new VR's sound great, but I'd rather not spend so much. Did WD give you any indication of a release date for the 150GB version of the VR? There's a PDF on their website that includes a 150GB VR model in their product lineup, but no indication of price/availability.
Great review. I've always wanted to go 2.5'' to save space, especially now since I'm using an NSK1300, but I've been tentative to give up the quickness of a raptor drive. The new VR's sound great, but I'd rather not spend so much. Did WD give you any indication of a release date for the 150GB version of the VR? There's a PDF on their website that includes a 150GB VR model in their product lineup, but no indication of price/availability.
What I find interesting about the two attached charts (SPL with and without the heatsink) is the mass dampening effect.
As was pointed out, the high frequency (700+ Hz) dropped by removing the mass, while the low frequency (300- Hz) went up with the removal of the same mass. It's probably easier to hide the low frequency noise so it makes more sense, but as a pure exercise in showing real world mass dampening effects it's an interesting tool.
As was pointed out, the high frequency (700+ Hz) dropped by removing the mass, while the low frequency (300- Hz) went up with the removal of the same mass. It's probably easier to hide the low frequency noise so it makes more sense, but as a pure exercise in showing real world mass dampening effects it's an interesting tool.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12285
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
It's more revealing if you watch the freq. spectrum live. There's less boost in the lower freq range than those snapshot images indicate. Remember they are moments frozen in time. The next moment will not show exactly the same graph because HDD noise is not constant. Try running the MP3 file on a software that lets you analyze it -- actually a 30-day trial copy of SpectraPlus would work nicely -- and you'll get more insight into it all. Also, just listening to the sound file, you can't hear much difference in the low end, but you sure can hear the effect on the mids and highs. That's the way it is live, too, as I hear it.psyopper wrote:What I find interesting about the two attached charts (SPL with and without the heatsink) is the mass dampening effect.
As was pointed out, the high frequency (700+ Hz) dropped by removing the mass, while the low frequency (300- Hz) went up with the removal of the same mass. It's probably easier to hide the low frequency noise so it makes more sense, but as a pure exercise in showing real world mass dampening effects it's an interesting tool.
Quiter 20,000 RPM raptor?
Mike - well someone in WD was listening, according to this article about WD's work on a 20,000 RPM raptor:MikeC wrote:I have been talking with WD, and forwarded all the info in that last post about the noise w/ and w/o the frame. The rep expressed great surprise, and the info has been forward to their engineers. We'll see if anything comes of it.lm wrote:Mike: Thanks for the clarification. So to make it silent, I have to take it out of the frame and soft mount it? I mean, if the thing touches any metal even without the frame, it would be really bad right?
Are you talking back to WD about this issue? Maybe they fix it...
However, our sources said that the drive will be ‘silent’ – that’s the last thing I would have expected from a drive with platters spinning at 20,000 RPM. Western Digital is apparently working on silencing the beast by improving the housing technology, which will now not just act as a heatsink, but also as a noise cancelling device. We’d also hope that the drive enclosure has some vibration dampening technology as well, because that’s also likely to be a problem given the high spindle speeds.