overclockers.com has good article of how to tidy a case
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Devonavar
overclockers.com has good article of how to tidy a case
Cheap, Clean, Cool and Quiet Case Cooling
Actually, most of it is semi-old news to SPCR regulars, but nevertheless a good starting point for newcomers.
Actually, most of it is semi-old news to SPCR regulars, but nevertheless a good starting point for newcomers.
-
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 9:45 am
- Location: CA
Re: overclockers.com has good article of how to tidy a case
7 fans?Pjotor wrote:Cheap, Clean, Cool and Quiet Case Cooling
Actually, most of it is semi-old news to SPCR regulars, but nevertheless a good starting point for newcomers.
-
- SPCR Reviewer
- Posts: 8636
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 6:33 am
- Location: Sunny SoCal
...And I can't quite make out the PSU, but it must be a fixed speed version and the author's obviously not concerned about feeding it a steady supply of 40°C+ air.Overclockers Article wrote: it measures 55 dB from 3 feet away before the cooling modification, and 39 dB after the mod.
You certainly gotta give him Brownie Points for his thought and effort though.
-
- SPCR Reviewer
- Posts: 8636
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 6:33 am
- Location: Sunny SoCal
If you think about the typical PC air flow it is much like this machine - other than the cold air CPU duct. All he really did was to use ducts and internal fans to better focus that air flow. In effect the cooling air is used in a sequence (HDD ==> GPU ==> chip set ==> PSU & CPU ==> PSU). It also seems to me that the PSU is an air flow bottle neck that results in increased air flow impedence. Thus he needs more fans to have enough air flow. Would it not be better to use ducts to divide the cold intake air into seperate streams for each device that needs cooling and then vent that warm air from each device out of the case?
Isnt it just Math?
teknerd, you may need to check your math.teknerd wrote:While the article does have some good points, the author obviously doesnt know much about sound measurement, seeing as he noted that a 16dB drop in noise was only a 29% drop.
A 29%dB reduction from 55dB is 16dB
Re: Isnt it just Math?
Sleeper:Sleeper wrote:teknerd, you may need to check your math.
A 29%dB reduction from 55dB is 16dB
Sound measurement in dB is not linear. An increase of 10dB doubles the sound while a decrese of 10dB cuts the sound in half,
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 4:55 pm
- Location: Pelham, AL
3 dB versus 10 dB
There seems to be some confusion here. Twice the electrical power is +3 dB, half power is -3 dB. However, the human brain/ear subsystem responds logarithmically, so to takes a 10 dB increase to SOUND twice as loud, a 10 dB decrease SOUNDS half as loud. That is why two identical fans don't SOUND twice as loud as one.
No, it is not that the human ear perceives an increase of 3dB as an increase of 10dB. What Bill means is that the human ear doesn't perceive an increase of 3dB as twice as loud even though it is (in power), it's not until the sound has increased 10dB that the human ear perceives it as twice as loud.
Re: Isnt it just Math?
Holy CR_P!teknerd wrote:Sleeper:Sleeper wrote:teknerd, you may need to check your math.
A 29%dB reduction from 55dB is 16dB
Sound measurement in dB is not linear. An increase of 10dB doubles the sound while a decrese of 10dB cuts the sound in half,
Man I did not mean to start something here.
I only meant to point out that the author does not compare dB to noise.
Since dB is used exclusively here, it is linear.
Peace man!
Re: Isnt it just Math?
Now the author have fixed sound reduction to 97%.
*sigh* http://www.blanket-insulation.com/Acous ... sound.html
So a 16 dBA reduction corresponds to more than %82 absolute reduction
So a 16 dBA reduction corresponds to more than %82 absolute reduction