Cases for driveless systems?

Enclosures and acoustic damping to help quiet them.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Devonavar

Post Reply
cbsmith
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:23 pm

Cases for driveless systems?

Post by cbsmith » Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:47 am

I'm looking for a case for a driveless system. I have this weird configuration in mind with a C2D and a fairly decent amount of RAM (2-4GB), but I'd just as soon not have a drive in it (no drive == quieter). I'd also like the case to be as small as possible, but it seems like most cases out there have room for a laptop drive, if not a desktop drive. Perhaps I'm overly concerned about it, but I keep thinking I could get a smaller case if it didn't have a drive bay. Any pointers on good cases for that kind of set up?

the_beast
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:00 pm

Post by the_beast » Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:07 am

There are several options for thin client type cases that do not have space for a drive, and are therefore tiny and often silent. However they only have space for pc/104 or nano-itx motherboards, and nothing that will come close to mATX or similar that you could put a C2D into. Most boards of this type don't even have proper RAM slots.

My guess is that, if you can afford a case large enough to accomodate a full motherboard & hsf to allow you to use a C2D and 2Gb+ of RAM, you won't notice the reduction in size that losing a 2.5 inch disk would allow you...

DanW
Posts: 190
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 3:20 am
Location: UK

Post by DanW » Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:16 am

what are you going to use for storage? A flash card? if so, you can just utilize the space where you could put the hard drive for the flash card.

How small are the cases you are looking at?

kakazza
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 1:27 am

Post by kakazza » Sun Feb 25, 2007 5:56 am

the_beast wrote:There are several options for thin client type cases that do not have space for a drive, and are therefore tiny and often silent. However they only have space for pc/104 or nano-itx motherboards, and nothing that will come close to mATX or similar that you could put a C2D into. Most boards of this type don't even have proper RAM slots.

My guess is that, if you can afford a case large enough to accomodate a full motherboard & hsf to allow you to use a C2D and 2Gb+ of RAM, you won't notice the reduction in size that losing a 2.5 inch disk would allow you...

µATX:
http://www.techpowerup.com/?25901

* Socket LGA 775, Micro ATX
* Supports Intel® Core™ 2 Duo/Celeron® 400 Series Processor
* Intel® G33 + ICH9
* FSB 1333 MHz
* Supports Dual Channel DDR2 667/800 MHz
* 4 x DDR2 DIMM Memory Slots, Max. Supports up to 8GB Memory
* 1 x PCI-E x16, 1 x PCI-E x1, 2 x PCI Slots
* On Board Graphic Max. Memory Share 384 MB
* 8+2-Channel HD Audio, 12 x USB 2.0
* 4 x SATAII 3Gb/s Connectors, GbE LAN

the_beast
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:00 pm

Post by the_beast » Sun Feb 25, 2007 6:06 am

Exactly my point - to put a C2D on a mobo you need to have at least an matx board. Which means there is little point trying to save the space needed for a drive, as it won't make much difference to the overall case volume.

The only cases I know of that do not provide a space for any drives at all are designed to hold only single board industrial type computers. None that I know of will hold a C2D, and even if they could they wouldn't hold a HSF that could cool such a chip. They often use via or slower chips. I personally use a pc/104 board that uses a 166MHz chip. I can get a case for this board that will attach to the vesa mounts on the back of a motherboard. As the entire board uses 6W full load, it runs completely silent. But it is obviously not very powerful, and playback of mp3s is about it's limit.

Edit: this is not actually the board I have, but it illustrates my point. This is the smallest, yet most powerful system I know of that has no space for a drive. The Via 800MHz processor would be ample for most desktop tasks, and will probably handle dvd playback etc as it probably has a hardware decoder. But a C2D it ain't...

http://www.wordit.com/catalog/product_i ... 4f75095151

I did manage to find some 3.5 inch form factor Commel boards that would take Core processors, but they were mobile processors only. There are also some mini-itx boards available. None of these are cheap however.

The fact remains that the only systems that usually are diskless are thin clients. And thin clients do not need C2D processing power. Therefore manufacturers don't make tiny, diskless enclosures for C2D motherboards. Also, as you asked the question on this forum, I assume you want the system quiet. Quiet C2D cooling = big heatsink = big case = no gain from having no drive bays.

I kinda feel like I'm arguing with myself (I just got intregued by how small you could make a reasonable system, so kept looking at the options). From what I could find you will need to either:

a) make your own case and create some clever way of cooling your processor.

b) go for a lower power system

c) put up with a slightly larger case

cbsmith
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:23 pm

Post by cbsmith » Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:35 am

DanW wrote:what are you going to use for storage? A flash card? if so, you can just utilize the space where you could put the hard drive for the flash card.

How small are the cases you are looking at?
PXE + NFS. Networks are a lovely thing.

cbsmith
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:23 pm

Post by cbsmith » Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:54 am

the_beast wrote:Exactly my point - to put a C2D on a mobo you need to have at least an matx board.
My understanding is that at the very least you can stuff a mobile C2D inside the mini-ITX boards designed for CoreDuo's.
the_beast wrote:Which means there is little point trying to save the space needed for a drive, as it won't make much difference to the overall case volume.
So, looking at the AOpen miniPC's, which are a half foot by half foot by two inches, it seems like you can get C2D's down small enough that a drive would make a difference.
the_best wrote: The only cases I know of that do not provide a space for any drives at all are designed to hold only single board industrial type computers. None that I know of will hold a C2D, and even if they could they wouldn't hold a HSF that could cool such a chip.
I obviously haven't had any better luck finding a system that would fit them, but I would disagree about the heat issue. The mobile C2D's are fairly cool, and if you undervolt them a bit will get even cooler.
the_best wrote: I did manage to find some 3.5 inch form factor Commel boards that would take Core processors, but they were mobile processors only. There are also some mini-itx boards available. None of these are cheap however.
Thanks for the pointers to Commel.
the_best wrote: The fact remains that the only systems that usually are diskless are thin clients. And thin clients do not need C2D processing power.
I guess it depends on your definition of what a thin client is. Certainly decoding H.264 is no light weight job, nor is voice recognition, nor is being a node in a computer cluster (and you can find nice compact diskless bits for the latter, the problem is they are designed for fitting in a rack).
the_best wrote: Therefore manufacturers don't make tiny, diskless enclosures for C2D motherboards.
Yes, I believe the crux of the problem is that the market for them must be insanely small.
the_best wrote: Also, as you asked the question on this forum, I assume you want the system quiet. Quiet C2D cooling = big heatsink = big case = no gain from having no drive bays.
I've seen designs where the case itself provided the "big heatsink", which I have to think is more than sufficient.

Thanks for all your thoughts, and I have been kind of thinking that what I'm looking for is impossible, but there does seem to still be a thin ray of hope. I'll post if I find something suitable.

Ethyriel
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 12:47 am
Location: Arizona

Post by Ethyriel » Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:11 am

Ibase and some others also make MITX s755 motherboards for core 2.

ronrem
Posts: 1066
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:59 am
Location: Santa Cruz

Post by ronrem » Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:46 pm

If you want tiny and silent I think making a case is the likely route. Bear in mind that squeezing a heat source into a shoebox only makes the cooling issues a bit more of a problem.

65 nm Semprons may be showing up in a few months-and by then maybe there's an undersize AM2 mobo,underclocked-undervolted you might get away with a big but relatively low profile HS,the type like an Aerocool Dominator or one of the thermalrights with a top fan. Do you have an external fanless PSU? Put in a VERY slow case fan,or mount the fan on the HS,very slow and maybe ducted?

As an interesting experiment,It would be a challenge. I do kind of wonder about the functionality at the end. What will you be able to do?

There are ways now to run a HD external and seperate. You can splice onto your 12v power feed and use a long SATA cable,or can get an external USB2 setup and put it at a distance. It's possible now to fit a XP-Lite install on a plug-in USB2 device,flash type,or a compact Linux. I'd guess there's a performance hit there. I guess it's a question of what you use this puter for.

ronrem
Posts: 1066
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 2:59 am
Location: Santa Cruz

Post by ronrem » Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:21 pm

It is quite easy-and pretty cheap,to create a functional computer based on a Sempron 3000 and an MATX mobo with a single enclosed-suspended HD,a fanless PSU and one big very slow fan.

The ideal setup does not exist-yet...you'd need some basic power tools and you'd make it. The airflow would be important. I'd figure a Ninja and a 120mm fan on it at 400 rpm,meaning a fan that stock runs at 800 rpm or less,used at minimal voltage. The front-sides-top would be solid wood/particle board. the top would be covered with sheet metal,because a Fortran Zen fanless PSU would be EXTERNALLY mounted. Your DVD /CD burner would be external. You'd go cordless with mouse and keyboard,so the computer can be at some distance,with the limit being the reach of the monitor cable.

Your cases front and side panels extend at least 3" below the bottom,and the bottom is essentially open,as is the rear with at most a mesh or screen to keep out mice and children,or whatever pets and pests....
This lets the minimal airflow/rpm of that fan do the most good.

The HDD probably could be a Samsung T series,which is pretty cool and quiet. The M series 2.5's are SLIGHTLY cooler-quieter,but there is a performance hit...and the $ per GB is higher too. making a suspendable heat-sink,noise blocking box is really not tough if you think it through.
Making a case is not tough if you scavange the mobo tray-backside from a scrap case and hack away the unwanted parts. I'd think a 12"x12" x 9" box would work,figure another 3" above for the PSU. I doubt youd hear anything,but you'd have a pretty decent performer.

the_beast
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:00 pm

Post by the_beast » Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:25 pm

I didn't mean to make my post sound so negative. I just kept on finding nice small options for motherboards that I didn't know existed, but I am yet to find any decent cases to go with them.

I guess you're right about the purpose of thin clients - I should have said that most thin clients don't need much power as they are mainly used for POS or similar applications.

As said above, I think your best bet would be to make your own case. To be honest, if it ends up half as small as you seem to want it to be you won't even need to make a good job of it - it will be so small no-one will notice it anyway! I guess you don't really want to build a case with a Ninja in it however, as that is about the same size as an entire MiniPC on its own...

One last thing though - the volume of the AOpen case you mentioned is 6x6x2=72 cubic inches. The volume of a 2.5in drive is about 5% of that. So it isn't really going to make a noticeable difference, especially as the drive can sit over the flat parts of the motherboard next to the ram and heatsinks which need the headroom. I would bet that even without a hard disk the AOpen case could not be made much smaller. Removing the optical drive would yield a little space however.

Chris Chan
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:15 pm
Location: Michigan

Post by Chris Chan » Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:36 am

Note: Removing the optical drive wouldn't give you that much space, realistically. Laptop opticals are only like 11mm high.

the_beast
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:00 pm

Post by the_beast » Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:41 am

but if your case is only 2 inches high and 6 inches square, taking out the optical drive is likely to reduce the case height by a full 11mm, which is over 20% volume reduction. Which is noticeable.

Chris Chan
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:15 pm
Location: Michigan

Post by Chris Chan » Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:19 pm

To me, it's just that I view reductions in height with no change in footprint as less noticeable than reductions in footprint.

cbsmith
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:23 pm

Post by cbsmith » Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:12 am

Chris Chan wrote:To me, it's just that I view reductions in height with no change in footprint as less noticeable than reductions in footprint.
As far as I am concerned, reductions in height are awesome. Even if you care about footprint, turn it on its side and voila.

the_beast
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:00 pm

Post by the_beast » Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:28 am

height is my concern too. An HTPC sits so much nicer under my TV if it is only the same height as a dvd player. Depth I can handle as I can't see it anyway.

klankymen
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 1069
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Munich, Bavaria, Europe

Post by klankymen » Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:42 am

I agree with you on the need for smaller diskless cases.

My dream case would be basically an antec fusion, just wiht the entire front 6 inches where the drives go chopped off.

Post Reply