Yahooo! We're number 16!!!?!?!?!

dasman · Post by **dasman** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 4:37 pm

Congrats to all SPCR's as we've jumped to #16 in the team rankings. Also congrats to ARM systems, currently #1 on our team

Must be having a problem over on Stanford's stat pages, looks like everything was wiped out and started from scratch today (I have a whopping 33pts, but I'm #26 -- not bad, jumping about 70 spots in an afternoon)

Dave

Edit -- here is URL http://folding.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/teampage?q=31574

ColdFlame · Post by **ColdFlame** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 5:10 pm

Wow I'm #13 weeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!

nap_loaf · Post by **nap_loaf** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 5:44 pm

This is useful to know, since it means we currently have the 16th (now 15th!) highest daily production. It would've been easy to figure that out beforehand, but still...

Their main team rankings page is messed up and slow to respond. If it's not a bug, it could be an intentional attack...I hope their work results aren't affected.

herosformula · Post by **herosformula** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 6:03 pm

Look at the stats more closely, there are people that have gone up 32 ranks today by turning in -613 points. So, unless negative points are worth far more than positive points, the stats system is broken.

roym@arm · Post by **roym@arm** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 6:38 pm

Stevo and I printed the F@H Stats in PDF format and we're going to get it framed. We figured we'll never see these numbers again and we want a permanent proof that, at least for a fleeting moment, we got to be # 1.

Sorry TRC-13.

Roy

NullObject · Post by **NullObject** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 9:10 pm

Stanford's stat database got corrupted. They are restoring it from backup and re-entering recent data. They think it will be fixed in a day or so.

See: http://www.stanford.edu/group/pandegrou ... /news.html

ColdFlame · Post by **ColdFlame** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 11:21 pm

My daily production is -6.5k

that is negative 6 grand!

Stevo@ARM · Post by **Stevo@ARM** » Wed Feb 11, 2004 11:44 pm

ColdFlame wrote:My daily production is -6.5k that is negative 6 grand!

That's because these points came from a mirror universe, in that realm you are a Foldin' KING

haysdb · Post by **haysdb** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 12:28 am

Stevo@ARM wrote:
ColdFlame wrote:My daily production is -6.5k that is negative 6 grand!
That's because these points came from a mirror universe, in that realm you are a Foldin' KING

I'm -16,615. Does that make me the Foldin' QUEEN?

CoolGav · Post by **CoolGav** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 1:13 am

I thought something was up when checking extremeoverclocking stats - so may red people - so it means I'm not suddenly a poor folder about to be relegated down the order...

In a similar vein, last night my Linux desktop (XP2400+) that I had been having trouble with last month, decided that there was a problem with the hard drive and wouldn't complete a boot. The drive is a few years old, and some of the other Fujitsu's I've had from around that time have been having issues in the past few months. (These are from before there were the major issues with Fujitsu's - and my older ones are still working fine). So rather than risk my time and effort on them, I'm having to get a new drive to keep that box alive and folding... Luckily there wasn't much data on the drive, and what there was I was able to copy over to another linux box - Hard drive failure with a warning!

ArtCubed · Post by **ArtCubed** » Thu Feb 12, 2004 10:27 am

I was wondering why the stats at EOC were so off...at least we can still get WU's. AND I get a "critical exit" on my sig. Arg.