SPCR Folds Team Blog
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Undisclosed but sober in US
Not just hot weather, but problems with thunderstorms. I went home to find my not-local folder off, and all the clocks blinking.
That folder, by the way, is in the hottest room in the house. No heat problems though. No case, just the mobo sitting my desk with the CPU fan and an 80mm NMB blowing on the northbridge.
That folder, by the way, is in the hottest room in the house. No heat problems though. No case, just the mobo sitting my desk with the CPU fan and an 80mm NMB blowing on the northbridge.
I'll be passing you by the end of next year! (should the same points difference continue...) For now I'm #32 for the #32 team!aristide1 wrote:Yeesh, on the team user list I may pass 2 people in the near furture, and after that I will have to earn another 300,000 points before I pass the one after that.
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Undisclosed but sober in US
This is not an ego trip for me. I would prefer you pass me after I buy a quad or two, and I would pat you on the back when you do so.CoolGav wrote:I'll be passing you by the end of next year! (should the same points difference continue...) For now I'm #32 for the #32 team!aristide1 wrote:Yeesh, on the team user list I may pass 2 people in the near furture, and after that I will have to earn another 300,000 points before I pass the one after that.
Frankly I can't believe I've gotten this far.
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Undisclosed but sober in US
Ugh, of all the reasons to lose points having a WU hang on shut down irks me the most.
Then I can't start because it expired, so I download, but it's all different. And I found and downloaded the SMP version for Windows, which now requires the -SMP switch, but installation is painless. I downloaded it and I started it. That's it.
Which means my Ubuntu box is going to have the same situation, time for a new version.
Then I can't start because it expired, so I download, but it's all different. And I found and downloaded the SMP version for Windows, which now requires the -SMP switch, but installation is painless. I downloaded it and I started it. That's it.
Which means my Ubuntu box is going to have the same situation, time for a new version.
Heh thanksaristide1 wrote:You're #114, you're moving right along. We'll stay up late and wait for you. And we'll leave the light on too.kittle wrote:...I'll be happy when i can get to page #1
Im still trying to get the GPU client and the "new" smp client to play well together. I have to use the older version of their beta because the new one doesnt support 64-bit windows.
Once the weather cools down, i can fire up my older server - that will help as well.
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:02 pm
As I read when the new GPU client was just released, it is not recommended to run the GPU client together with an smp client, as the GPU client will use a considerable amount of CPU power (here it's at about 52%).kittle wrote:Im still trying to get the GPU client and the "new" smp client to play well together. I have to use the older version of their beta because the new one doesnt support 64-bit windows.
Hopefully (and hinted at by Stanford) a newer GPU client won't use as much CPU power.
Anyway, if you get both of them working, great
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Undisclosed but sober in US
Do you still do CPU folding as well?
Do PCI-E 2.0 cards work in 1.0 slots? I guess I should check Wiki.
Added - With minor video card exceptions (what other kind is there with PCI-E X16?) 1.0 and 2.0 are upwards and downwards compatible.
We'll see as I order a video card. Due to unfortunate circumstances I need to buy my first copy of XP (OEM) so a hardware purchase is required, and this one is as good as any.
Do PCI-E 2.0 cards work in 1.0 slots? I guess I should check Wiki.
Added - With minor video card exceptions (what other kind is there with PCI-E X16?) 1.0 and 2.0 are upwards and downwards compatible.
We'll see as I order a video card. Due to unfortunate circumstances I need to buy my first copy of XP (OEM) so a hardware purchase is required, and this one is as good as any.
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Undisclosed but sober in US
OW!
I've gone through my fair share of WU's that stall at very end recently. I lose time but it's not a huge problem. I'd be more upset if I was away 3 or 4 days and it my pc would be hung all that time but this.....
The last WU hung. I let it go 1 hour, it didn't budge so I closed it and opened it again. Then I got a popup window from FAH!, a first for me, saying that there was a severe error, no code or info, and that it was closing down. About as informative as a Microsoft message. I did this 4 times and then I tried deleting all the files and folders in the work folder. The so called completed WU files, their size was zero. Huh? FAH was shut down, but no matter, I could not delete most files having to do with the latest WU. I ended up reinstalling in a new folder, version 6.22.
I lost the WU and another 4-5 hours on top of that. I hate when Stanford released new programs. <Insert raspberry here>
I've gone through my fair share of WU's that stall at very end recently. I lose time but it's not a huge problem. I'd be more upset if I was away 3 or 4 days and it my pc would be hung all that time but this.....
The last WU hung. I let it go 1 hour, it didn't budge so I closed it and opened it again. Then I got a popup window from FAH!, a first for me, saying that there was a severe error, no code or info, and that it was closing down. About as informative as a Microsoft message. I did this 4 times and then I tried deleting all the files and folders in the work folder. The so called completed WU files, their size was zero. Huh? FAH was shut down, but no matter, I could not delete most files having to do with the latest WU. I ended up reinstalling in a new folder, version 6.22.
I lost the WU and another 4-5 hours on top of that. I hate when Stanford released new programs. <Insert raspberry here>
they sortof work together.spookmineer wrote:As I read when the new GPU client was just released, it is not recommended to run the GPU client together with an smp client, as the GPU client will use a considerable amount of CPU power (here it's at about 52%).kittle wrote:Im still trying to get the GPU client and the "new" smp client to play well together. I have to use the older version of their beta because the new one doesnt support 64-bit windows.
Hopefully (and hinted at by Stanford) a newer GPU client won't use as much CPU power.
Anyway, if you get both of them working, great
I have a 4 core system (2x dual core Opteron). so its just a matter of setting the SMP client to only use 75-80% cpu and let the gpu client have the rest.
im still fumbling for the proper balance of settings. Currently im running GPU only so I can see how many PPD and WU / D it will process.
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Undisclosed but sober in US
As Stanford goes through a bunch of servers problems my Vista folder has been doing one or more of the following:
1. Getting invalid acknowledgements.
2. Attempting to transmit completed WUs and ruining the Net connection.
3. Having WUs time out.
Doesn't seem to matter what server its connected to, its folding and the results are ending up in the garbage can.
Seems summer may be a good time to not fold, or perhaps the first month after a new version. Seems like a huge waste of resources.
1. Getting invalid acknowledgements.
2. Attempting to transmit completed WUs and ruining the Net connection.
3. Having WUs time out.
Doesn't seem to matter what server its connected to, its folding and the results are ending up in the garbage can.
Seems summer may be a good time to not fold, or perhaps the first month after a new version. Seems like a huge waste of resources.
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:06 pm
- Location: New Hampshire, US
- Contact:
well, I think we're boned,
Folding farm for Overclock.net. If we had just one user like that, I don't think we'd be dropping rank this fast.
Folding farm for Overclock.net. If we had just one user like that, I don't think we'd be dropping rank this fast.
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Undisclosed but sober in US
You mean the guy with the 51 NVidia cards? If he's was smart enough to get the 8800GS at 59 watts each that's 3 Kilowatts each hour, or about 350+ dollars a month to fold. And if it's 8800GTS G92 cards it TWICE that.
Holy you-know-what.
Of course if his electric bill goes any higher the police may think he's growing pot at home in the attic or basement.
The good news is that as a team we're averaging almost 1000 PPD, which is a record for us, especially with only 105 active folders, which is like a record low.
Holy you-know-what.
Of course if his electric bill goes any higher the police may think he's growing pot at home in the attic or basement.
The good news is that as a team we're averaging almost 1000 PPD, which is a record for us, especially with only 105 active folders, which is like a record low.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact:
Hiya,
Can someone email me the FahCore_79.exe file for Windows, please? For some reason, I have not been able to download it for months...
Or, has anybody had any luck getting either of the new Windows SMP clients to work? I can install them, and they start to run, and then almost immediately they have a fatal error. This is on two different machines with WinXP Pro (32bit and 64bit).
Can someone email me the FahCore_79.exe file for Windows, please? For some reason, I have not been able to download it for months...
Or, has anybody had any luck getting either of the new Windows SMP clients to work? I can install them, and they start to run, and then almost immediately they have a fatal error. This is on two different machines with WinXP Pro (32bit and 64bit).
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 1439
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:06 pm
- Location: New Hampshire, US
- Contact:
I had a similar issue, the only way i fixed it was by installing the SMP client to a new directory, and reconfiguring it.NeilBlanchard wrote:Hiya,
Can someone email me the FahCore_79.exe file for Windows, please? For some reason, I have not been able to download it for months...
Or, has anybody had any luck getting either of the new Windows SMP clients to work? I can install them, and they start to run, and then almost immediately they have a fatal error. This is on two different machines with WinXP Pro (32bit and 64bit).
-
- SPCR Reviewer
- Posts: 561
- Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
Can anyone explain to me why I've got four FahCore processes running on a dual-core machine? As far as I can tell, the install.bat file only ran two test cases of mpiexec... but FAH seems to want to run four...
EDIT - Actually... here's another quirk for you. I've installed the SMP client as it should be, and I'm trying to get things working with srvany so the client runs as a service in the background. However, it's not picking up on my AppDirectory parameter in the registry key for the service.
AppDirectory = REG_SZ "C:\Program Files (x86)\Folding@Home SMP"
If I start the service while allowing it to interact with the desktop (i.e. show the command window) it tells me that the launch directory is C:\WINDOWS\System32....
EDIT - Actually... here's another quirk for you. I've installed the SMP client as it should be, and I'm trying to get things working with srvany so the client runs as a service in the background. However, it's not picking up on my AppDirectory parameter in the registry key for the service.
AppDirectory = REG_SZ "C:\Program Files (x86)\Folding@Home SMP"
If I start the service while allowing it to interact with the desktop (i.e. show the command window) it tells me that the launch directory is C:\WINDOWS\System32....
That seems normal to, me at least my classic client runs four processes (only one of which actually take CPU time) without SMP (this is on Linux).Nick Geraedts wrote:Can anyone explain to me why I've got four FahCore processes running on a dual-core machine? As far as I can tell, the install.bat file only ran two test cases of mpiexec... but FAH seems to want to run four...
-
- SPCR Reviewer
- Posts: 561
- Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
I'm currently showing four FahCore_a1.exe processes, each trying to hog as much CPU power as possible... from what I can tell, it really shouldn't be doing this, unless Stanford has figured out a good reason for putting more threads than cores on a particular machine.floffe wrote:That seems normal to, me at least my classic client runs four processes (only one of which actually take CPU time) without SMP (this is on Linux).
-
- SPCR Reviewer
- Posts: 561
- Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC