Thermalright T-Rad²
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:10 pm
- Location: Toronto - Ontario - Canada
-
- Posts: 1386
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm
Fins are packed much closer than on Accelero and they are also parallel to the rear expansion slot covers which means that you won't be able to dissipate heat using negative pressure with expansion slot covers off or by using fan on the upper P182 HDD section.
I suspect this will make a great performing cooler, provided it is actively cooled, and will make a great choice for HTPC cases, many of which won't fit Accelero S1, however I believe it will be hard to use passively and Accelero S1 will hold the edge in passive or very low airflow configuration.
I suspect this will make a great performing cooler, provided it is actively cooled, and will make a great choice for HTPC cases, many of which won't fit Accelero S1, however I believe it will be hard to use passively and Accelero S1 will hold the edge in passive or very low airflow configuration.
-
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:25 am
I'm thinking it won't cool as well as an Accelero S1. The heatsink is more compact, being both narrower and thinner. The fins appear to be spaced closer together, and face perpendicular to the path of airflow, so it probably won't perform anywhere near as well when used passively. On the plus side, it should definitely fit into smaller cases.
Edit: Wow... I was a few minutes late and Jazz covered everything I was writing in my own post. : P
Edit: Wow... I was a few minutes late and Jazz covered everything I was writing in my own post. : P
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:05 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:10 pm
- Location: Toronto - Ontario - Canada
I don't think Thermalright aim is for the passive market they have never wide spaced fins. I'm not to high on running anything passive I perfer low noise, low RPM fan. Some airflow is better then none. I think this way the can cater to the performance overlocker crowd and the silent PC crowd.JazzJackRabbit wrote:Fins are packed much closer than on Accelero and they are also parallel to the rear expansion slot covers which means that you won't be able to dissipate heat using negative pressure with expansion slot covers off or by using fan on the upper P182 HDD section.
I suspect this will make a great performing cooler, provided it is actively cooled, and will make a great choice for HTPC cases, many of which won't fit Accelero S1, however I believe it will be hard to use passively and Accelero S1 will hold the edge in passive or very low airflow configuration.
-
- Posts: 871
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:37 am
- Location: North Carolina
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:05 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
Really? i suppose SPCR is pretty poor at reviews, since they found that using the exact same reference fan on the TRUE it bested every other cooler at 12 or 9v, and was within 2c at 5v (490rpm) to the very best passive specialised heatsinks. Id say that they are doing at least something right there.Plekto wrote:Thermalwrong just seems to not have a clue as to how actual cooling works. It looks fancy and good, but it'll be like their CPU coolers. Should work better than a Ninja... but only with loud fans, which aren't much quieter than the stock vacuum cleaners.
The problem was that it wasn't any better at extremely quit speeds, despite all of the extra metal and cost. I don't expect this to work as well, especially passively, as the S1.FartingBob wrote:Really? i suppose SPCR is pretty poor at reviews, since they found that using the exact same reference fan on the TRUE it bested every other cooler at 12 or 9v, and was within 2c at 5v (490rpm) to the very best passive specialized heat sinks. Id say that they are doing at least something right there.
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:05 am
- Location: London
- Contact:
If they wanted to really please the silent crowd they'd take their TRUE, or this GPU cooler and take out 1/3 of the fins and then space out the remaining ones. Much less restricted airflow, cheaper and lighter. A pattern we're seeing with them right now is cram as many heatpipes and fins as possible onto the heatsink. This may look nice and cool well when you have a 2000rpm 120mm fan on it, but for passive cooling and acoustics its very bad.
I can't understand what they were thinking with this design.
As has already been pointed out, the fins run the wrong way. It would be better to make a dual slot cooler with find parallel to the card, so that air can flow out the back of the case. Also, in a case with front fan blowing on to the graphics card, you can make better use of that with parallel fins.
Also, why no pads for memory? Maybe they are going for universal GPU compatibility, but that leaves you with using those naff stick on heatsinks for RAM.
Why only one 120mm fan? Larger cards have room for two.
I'd like to see something with parallel fins and both top and bottom fins (like the old Zalman coolers) since many cases have an open slot above the graphics card as well.
I expect it will perform very well, but it's going to have to be very cheap to compete with the Acceleros.
As has already been pointed out, the fins run the wrong way. It would be better to make a dual slot cooler with find parallel to the card, so that air can flow out the back of the case. Also, in a case with front fan blowing on to the graphics card, you can make better use of that with parallel fins.
Also, why no pads for memory? Maybe they are going for universal GPU compatibility, but that leaves you with using those naff stick on heatsinks for RAM.
Why only one 120mm fan? Larger cards have room for two.
I'd like to see something with parallel fins and both top and bottom fins (like the old Zalman coolers) since many cases have an open slot above the graphics card as well.
I expect it will perform very well, but it's going to have to be very cheap to compete with the Acceleros.
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 11:53 am
- Location: Markham
Release date should be late July ... see http://www.overclock.net/4037895-post71.html
hmm...the sideways orientation of the fins might actually be a good thing - many cases (esp. Lian Li) have a 12cm sidefan duct. In such a setup it might be possible to cool this rerasonably well with just that - although, as others have already pointed out, I fear the fin spacing might be a bit too tight for that.
I'd also beat the huge space requirements of the S1/2...in my current setup card + S2 + 12cm fan takes up 3 1/2 slots and sideducting an S1/2 is also not feasible as it's far too wide and even if you'd bend it downwards it would obscure just as many extra slots as it is now...
Such a setup might be even more interesting for SLI fans - each card would only take up 2 slots and you might even be able to cool 2 or 3 cards with a single 12cm fan - just speculating here ofc, wether such a setup would actually work would have to be tested first
If I can get my hands on a resonably priced one of these I'll give the sideduct cooling a shot - single card only though, I don't have a sli capable setup.
I'd also beat the huge space requirements of the S1/2...in my current setup card + S2 + 12cm fan takes up 3 1/2 slots and sideducting an S1/2 is also not feasible as it's far too wide and even if you'd bend it downwards it would obscure just as many extra slots as it is now...
Such a setup might be even more interesting for SLI fans - each card would only take up 2 slots and you might even be able to cool 2 or 3 cards with a single 12cm fan - just speculating here ofc, wether such a setup would actually work would have to be tested first
If I can get my hands on a resonably priced one of these I'll give the sideduct cooling a shot - single card only though, I don't have a sli capable setup.