Thermalright T-Rad²

They make noise, too.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
Hramm
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:09 am

Thermalright T-Rad²

Post by Hramm » Thu Jun 05, 2008 4:16 pm

Accelero S1 killer ?

ImageImage
ImageImage

Weight: 398 gr
Dimension: L228 mm x W104 mm x H24,3 mm
Compatible with 2x92mm or 1x120mm fan

johnniecache7
Posts: 332
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Toronto - Ontario - Canada

Post by johnniecache7 » Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:15 pm

:shock: I say the Accelero S1 is toast if that performs as good as it looks. I bet it going be more expensive by wide margin but knowing Thermalright's repuation for build quality it would be worth every penny. I buy one and ditch my Accelero S1.

JazzJackRabbit
Posts: 1386
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:53 pm

Post by JazzJackRabbit » Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:32 pm

Fins are packed much closer than on Accelero and they are also parallel to the rear expansion slot covers which means that you won't be able to dissipate heat using negative pressure with expansion slot covers off or by using fan on the upper P182 HDD section.

I suspect this will make a great performing cooler, provided it is actively cooled, and will make a great choice for HTPC cases, many of which won't fit Accelero S1, however I believe it will be hard to use passively and Accelero S1 will hold the edge in passive or very low airflow configuration.

Cryoburner
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:25 am

Post by Cryoburner » Thu Jun 05, 2008 7:38 pm

I'm thinking it won't cool as well as an Accelero S1. The heatsink is more compact, being both narrower and thinner. The fins appear to be spaced closer together, and face perpendicular to the path of airflow, so it probably won't perform anywhere near as well when used passively. On the plus side, it should definitely fit into smaller cases.

Edit: Wow... I was a few minutes late and Jazz covered everything I was writing in my own post. : P

FartingBob
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:05 am
Location: London
Contact:

Post by FartingBob » Fri Jun 06, 2008 4:17 am

SLI users rejoice! If it is as good passive as the S1 (probably wont match it, but could come close) then this could win over the HTPC and SLI market, something which is rare indeed!

johnniecache7
Posts: 332
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Toronto - Ontario - Canada

Post by johnniecache7 » Fri Jun 06, 2008 4:25 am

JazzJackRabbit wrote:Fins are packed much closer than on Accelero and they are also parallel to the rear expansion slot covers which means that you won't be able to dissipate heat using negative pressure with expansion slot covers off or by using fan on the upper P182 HDD section.

I suspect this will make a great performing cooler, provided it is actively cooled, and will make a great choice for HTPC cases, many of which won't fit Accelero S1, however I believe it will be hard to use passively and Accelero S1 will hold the edge in passive or very low airflow configuration.
I don't think Thermalright aim is for the passive market they have never wide spaced fins. I'm not to high on running anything passive I perfer low noise, low RPM fan. Some airflow is better then none. I think this way the can cater to the performance overlocker crowd and the silent PC crowd.

angelkiller
Posts: 871
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:37 am
Location: North Carolina

Post by angelkiller » Fri Jun 06, 2008 7:03 am

Assuming both heatsinks are using 2 of the same fans, I think performance difference will be within 5C. However, there's no way Thermalright can get that thing under $40. AC S1 will still maintain the best value, me thinks.

Modo
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 3:32 am
Location: Poland

Post by Modo » Fri Jun 06, 2008 7:56 am

This one clearly wins on size. In addition to SLI setups, it will fit some HTPC cases the Accelero won't.

Plekto
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:08 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by Plekto » Fri Jun 06, 2008 2:47 pm

Thermalwrong just seems to not have a clue as to how actual cooling works. It looks fancy and good, but it'll be like their CPU coolers. Should work better than a Ninja... but only with loud fans, which aren't much quieter than the stock vacuum cleaners.

FartingBob
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:05 am
Location: London
Contact:

Post by FartingBob » Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:33 pm

Plekto wrote:Thermalwrong just seems to not have a clue as to how actual cooling works. It looks fancy and good, but it'll be like their CPU coolers. Should work better than a Ninja... but only with loud fans, which aren't much quieter than the stock vacuum cleaners.
Really? i suppose SPCR is pretty poor at reviews, since they found that using the exact same reference fan on the TRUE it bested every other cooler at 12 or 9v, and was within 2c at 5v (490rpm) to the very best passive specialised heatsinks. Id say that they are doing at least something right there.

Plekto
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:08 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Post by Plekto » Fri Jun 06, 2008 3:50 pm

FartingBob wrote:
Really? i suppose SPCR is pretty poor at reviews, since they found that using the exact same reference fan on the TRUE it bested every other cooler at 12 or 9v, and was within 2c at 5v (490rpm) to the very best passive specialized heat sinks. Id say that they are doing at least something right there.
The problem was that it wasn't any better at extremely quit speeds, despite all of the extra metal and cost. I don't expect this to work as well, especially passively, as the S1.

Hramm
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:09 am

Post by Hramm » Fri Jun 06, 2008 5:03 pm

Thermalright is more reputed for OC cooling, and to have the first place in perfomance even being pricey...
The fact is they lost that edge in VGA cooling (and direct touch heatpipe), until maybe a review of the T-Rad. ^^'

ash2459
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:30 am

Post by ash2459 » Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:03 am

A Thermalright engineer at Computex 2008 told me that TR is eyeing the quiet/silent PC market and welcomes inputs (from quiet/silent PC fans).

Alan Hsu

FartingBob
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:05 am
Location: London
Contact:

Post by FartingBob » Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:18 am

If they wanted to really please the silent crowd they'd take their TRUE, or this GPU cooler and take out 1/3 of the fins and then space out the remaining ones. Much less restricted airflow, cheaper and lighter. A pattern we're seeing with them right now is cram as many heatpipes and fins as possible onto the heatsink. This may look nice and cool well when you have a 2000rpm 120mm fan on it, but for passive cooling and acoustics its very bad.

jmke
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 495
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 3:53 am
Location: In Front of PC
Contact:

Post by jmke » Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:58 am

this GPU cooler is based on forced aircooling, you'll have to fit a fan on there to make it work, passively it will turn out less impressive then the picture may lead you to expect.

Hramm
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:09 am

Post by Hramm » Mon Jun 09, 2008 1:56 am

From Thermalright support, it should be available in late-august. ^^

MoJo
Posts: 773
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 9:20 am
Location: UK

Post by MoJo » Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:14 am

I can't understand what they were thinking with this design.

As has already been pointed out, the fins run the wrong way. It would be better to make a dual slot cooler with find parallel to the card, so that air can flow out the back of the case. Also, in a case with front fan blowing on to the graphics card, you can make better use of that with parallel fins.

Also, why no pads for memory? Maybe they are going for universal GPU compatibility, but that leaves you with using those naff stick on heatsinks for RAM.

Why only one 120mm fan? Larger cards have room for two.

I'd like to see something with parallel fins and both top and bottom fins (like the old Zalman coolers) since many cases have an open slot above the graphics card as well.

I expect it will perform very well, but it's going to have to be very cheap to compete with the Acceleros.

silver bullet
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 11:53 am
Location: Markham

Post by silver bullet » Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:28 pm

Release date should be late July ... see http://www.overclock.net/4037895-post71.html

kel
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:32 am
Location: Switzerland

Post by kel » Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:44 pm

hmm...the sideways orientation of the fins might actually be a good thing - many cases (esp. Lian Li) have a 12cm sidefan duct. In such a setup it might be possible to cool this rerasonably well with just that - although, as others have already pointed out, I fear the fin spacing might be a bit too tight for that.
I'd also beat the huge space requirements of the S1/2...in my current setup card + S2 + 12cm fan takes up 3 1/2 slots and sideducting an S1/2 is also not feasible as it's far too wide and even if you'd bend it downwards it would obscure just as many extra slots as it is now...

Such a setup might be even more interesting for SLI fans - each card would only take up 2 slots and you might even be able to cool 2 or 3 cards with a single 12cm fan - just speculating here ofc, wether such a setup would actually work would have to be tested first ;-)

If I can get my hands on a resonably priced one of these I'll give the sideduct cooling a shot - single card only though, I don't have a sli capable setup.

gopherbob
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 4:52 am
Location: Jamups

Post by gopherbob » Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:21 pm

I've been looking at gpu coolers for a few weeks and I was pretty excited about that thermalright hr-03 gt (for 9600gt) but this thing looks sweet.

I tried to find a review for it and found this thread... better than nothing I suppose!

Fungi
Posts: 95
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 1:27 pm

Post by Fungi » Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:41 pm

I think I've seen that the T-Rad2 with 2 92mm fans performs slightly better than an Accelero S1 with Turbo Modules. Which, I think, translates to the Accelero S1 with 120mm fan (or 2 92mm fans) being better still, for less money.

Hramm
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:09 am

Post by Hramm » Mon Sep 22, 2008 3:34 pm

There has been a chinese review:

Image
Image

Post Reply