Coolest and cheapest fanless card at the moment?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
Coolest and cheapest fanless card at the moment?
Anyone got any idea what this would be?
With cool, I mean temperature wise of course...
Performance is more or less a non-issue (although it is great if it is linux compatible).
Tested a 5450 passive, but it is definitely a hot card...
With cool, I mean temperature wise of course...
Performance is more or less a non-issue (although it is great if it is linux compatible).
Tested a 5450 passive, but it is definitely a hot card...
Re: Coolest and cheapest fanless card at the moment?
To get less heat with reasonable performance, you'd probably have to use some of the modern integrated solutions. The 5450 is a very efficient design, and should not be overheating in normal scenarios. Either the case used has extremely bad airflow, or you are expecting unrealistic (much too low) temperatures for a GPU.
-
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
- Location: TN, USA
5450 is the lowest power card on the market
IDLE TDP of 6W and max TDP of 19W
Close to it are (repeating the 5450 for comparison)
Keep in mind actual power use is lower than TDP in most cases.
http://forums.atomicmpc.com.au/index.ph ... c=264&st=0 shows the 5450 only using 15W at most.
The last Nvidia card that performed under those sorts of power limits was the GeForce 7300 GS from 5 years ago (and there was the 7300 LE which used even less). Oh the 8500 GT was in that range but I don't consider it because of the problems the 8xxx cards had with failures due to bad solder.
As to cost you might find one of the older cards in the table above cheaper than a 5450 but I wouldn't guarantee it. On top of that you'd have a older card that may not play nice with newer OSes.
IDLE TDP of 6W and max TDP of 19W
Close to it are (repeating the 5450 for comparison)
Code: Select all
Card Idle TDP Max TDP
5450 6 19
4350 20
3430 20
2400 Pro 20
2350 20
http://forums.atomicmpc.com.au/index.ph ... c=264&st=0 shows the 5450 only using 15W at most.
The last Nvidia card that performed under those sorts of power limits was the GeForce 7300 GS from 5 years ago (and there was the 7300 LE which used even less). Oh the 8500 GT was in that range but I don't consider it because of the problems the 8xxx cards had with failures due to bad solder.
As to cost you might find one of the older cards in the table above cheaper than a 5450 but I wouldn't guarantee it. On top of that you'd have a older card that may not play nice with newer OSes.
Thanks!
Guess I will stay with the 5450 then.
I do not have a problem with it overheating, but want to keep the cabinet fan to an absolute minimum and the 5450 definitely produces heat!
Yes, I have been considering headless as well (tested too), but it is a bit awkward at times when for instance fsck wants you to press "yes" under boot or some other odd event occur.
This is an Asus mainboard, wish they could have done something to develop a ethernet management port with remote console cheap enough to include on every motherboard rather than the reasonably useless express gate thingy they have added.
Guess I will stay with the 5450 then.
I do not have a problem with it overheating, but want to keep the cabinet fan to an absolute minimum and the 5450 definitely produces heat!
Yes, I have been considering headless as well (tested too), but it is a bit awkward at times when for instance fsck wants you to press "yes" under boot or some other odd event occur.
This is an Asus mainboard, wish they could have done something to develop a ethernet management port with remote console cheap enough to include on every motherboard rather than the reasonably useless express gate thingy they have added.
Usually a server flavor of the OS will work ok. So vanilla Ubuntu might not work great headless but Ubuntu Server will.Terje wrote:Yes, I have been considering headless as well (tested too), but it is a bit awkward at times when for instance fsck wants you to press "yes" under boot or some other odd event occur.