new macs!
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
Prices are prohibitive though, particularly outside the USA due to the strong dollar (which is a rather weak argument, since most of the components and the assembly is outside the US).
Wonderful systems from a noise standpoint, but my prediction is that their desktop sales will drop. Sharply. Very Sharply.
Edit: And drop the Apple hate, it is pathetic. If you don't like their products, simply buy something else.
Wonderful systems from a noise standpoint, but my prediction is that their desktop sales will drop. Sharply. Very Sharply.
Edit: And drop the Apple hate, it is pathetic. If you don't like their products, simply buy something else.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact:
Hi,
My latest computer is a 24" iMac. It cost $1,800 -- and it draws ~116watts at full load (WHICH INCLUDES THE 24" MONITOR!), it is virtually silent, and it is very fast. And I won't have Registry corruptions, and it will probably never get a virus or have malware installed w/o my knowledge.
The monitor quality is excellent, btw -- I have not seen better.
My latest computer is a 24" iMac. It cost $1,800 -- and it draws ~116watts at full load (WHICH INCLUDES THE 24" MONITOR!), it is virtually silent, and it is very fast. And I won't have Registry corruptions, and it will probably never get a virus or have malware installed w/o my knowledge.
The monitor quality is excellent, btw -- I have not seen better.
Last edited by NeilBlanchard on Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I also have a previous model 24" iMac I use professionally, and the machine is okay, but OSX is less reliable for me than Vista.NeilBlanchard wrote:And I won't have Registry corruptions, and it will probably never get a virus or have malware installed w/o my knowledge.
These new iMacs are a little underwhelming. The Geforce 9400M is nice, but hopefully it is not in the models with discrete graphics. The Geforce GT 120 and 130 are pointless, but Apple has a tradtion of sticking poor video cards in the iMac. Funny how they now have nVidia low end and AMD high end options when nVidia has better high end cards (GTX 260) and AMD has better low end (4670). Almost like Apple is getting closeout deals on stuff PC makers can't sell. An Apple with the first RV740s--now that would've news.
As far as CPUs: a 45nm quad core option might have been nice, but a fast (~3.6GHz) dual core with the 9400M would have been great for me. I need to try the Hackintosh angle with my boss again...
Yes, computers are tools.rei wrote:don't be an ass, Matija. computers are tools but you don't have to be one.
So why not build your own tool, which is going to be better, cost less, and have a better operating system?
Macs are shiny. That's it. They offer absolutely no advantage over regular PCs and are, in fact, worse in everything.
Apple is a PC OEM like all the others except they have their own unique OS. Their hardware components are okay and their chassis are quite nice. As a low budget overclocker I can't imagine spending $1,800 on this machine I am typing at right now--it is considerably slower than my $400 PC at home, but I don't have a 24" H-IPS screen built into my home system either. A lot of this machine is mobile parts and that explains a lot of the rest of the cost--it is Intel "mobile" tax.Matija wrote:Macs are shiny. That's it. They offer absolutely no advantage over regular PCs and are, in fact, worse in everything.
Apple could make a more affordable mid range Mac tower--more along the lines of the G3/G4 towers or a typical PC, but they just don't. What they currently offer is a good deal for some people. Their OS is pretty much required in my industry, so they also sell a lot of poorly specified machines. That might hurt them in the long run.
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 3:32 am
- Location: SF Bay Area, California
This is about the Mac Mini, no? Look, I'm no Apple fanboy. I have never had an Apple PC, and I don't particularly see any advantages of the OS. That said, the new Mac Mini does look very cool.
Matija - why don't you go on newegg and try to configure a better computer in a case that's 6.5" x 6.5" x 2" (with rounded corners, at that)? Good luck! You won't even get anything with a mini-ITX (6.7" x 6.7") MOTHERBOARD (i.e., significantly bigger case) that has an onboard Nvidia 9400 yet.
Will I buy it? Nope. But I do think that it's good news for small PC enthusiasts, since similar motherboards will be coming in OEM forms soon enough.
One thing that struck me about the release is that it wasn't on the Nvidia Ion platform (i.e., with Intel Atom and not C2D) but still had the 9400. Did Apple decide that it didn't perform up to par, maybe?
Matija - why don't you go on newegg and try to configure a better computer in a case that's 6.5" x 6.5" x 2" (with rounded corners, at that)? Good luck! You won't even get anything with a mini-ITX (6.7" x 6.7") MOTHERBOARD (i.e., significantly bigger case) that has an onboard Nvidia 9400 yet.
Will I buy it? Nope. But I do think that it's good news for small PC enthusiasts, since similar motherboards will be coming in OEM forms soon enough.
One thing that struck me about the release is that it wasn't on the Nvidia Ion platform (i.e., with Intel Atom and not C2D) but still had the 9400. Did Apple decide that it didn't perform up to par, maybe?
Strikes me as an advantage. I'd much rather pay for a C2D, particularly because it supports virtualization. YMMV.shleepy wrote:One thing that struck me about the release is that it wasn't on the Nvidia Ion platform (i.e., with Intel Atom and not C2D) but still had the 9400. Did Apple decide that it didn't perform up to par, maybe?
I'm an open source type because I like free (as in freedom), despite the cost of having to debug Linux issues. OTOH, the Mini has always impressed me as an elegant design. Cheap, small, fast: pick any two. OK, the Mini is small and fast. Not a terrible value, but not cheap. (Small and quiet is never cheap!)
For US$599, it now comes with a "superdrive" (DVD writer) and decent (non-Intel) integrated graphics. 120 MB is adequate (server on the net). OK, 1MB is too small...
Dumb question: Is the lack of HDMI a DRM issue? I'd really like to do a media PC and the Linux choice (fast processor/no video driver support for HD) or Vista (better video drivers/don't need as much CPU, but Vista???) do not appeal.
Netflix on Linux may come "Real Soon Now" says Godot. The Mini looks attractive. (I'd like it even better with Mac OS X "Snow Leopard.")
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 3:32 am
- Location: SF Bay Area, California
No, I agree. It's just that the rumors proved false. It's certainly a better value at $600 with a C2D than with an Atom, heh.dougz wrote:Strikes me as an advantage. I'd much rather pay for a C2D, particularly because it supports virtualization. YMMV.shleepy wrote:One thing that struck me about the release is that it wasn't on the Nvidia Ion platform (i.e., with Intel Atom and not C2D) but still had the 9400. Did Apple decide that it didn't perform up to par, maybe?
-
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:28 pm
- Location: USA
Ion was the wrong tool for the job. Mini is supposed to be directly comparable to iMac -- one is for those who like separate monitor one is for those who don't. Ion is intended for something like an Apple TV, not a full featured desktop. Indeed, I expect we will see an Ion-based Applet TV at some point this year.shleepy wrote: One thing that struck me about the release is that it wasn't on the Nvidia Ion platform (i.e., with Intel Atom and not C2D) but still had the 9400. Did Apple decide that it didn't perform up to par, maybe?
-
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:28 pm
- Location: USA
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 3:05 am
- Location: Germany
IMHO it's a nice machine, just the thing I may replace my 1st-gen one with. Idle power consumption is impressive. I just hope it'll still be quiet under load, mine certainly isn't.
Sorry if that's been answered before - can the 9400M output two digital signals at once?
The price is still a bit high though (would prefer $100 less) and as usual the non-US prices are rip-offs. E.g. US price: $599, EU price: €599. Using current course, $599 = €477. I'd be much happier if the entry-level mini were ~€499.
Sorry if that's been answered before - can the 9400M output two digital signals at once?
The price is still a bit high though (would prefer $100 less) and as usual the non-US prices are rip-offs. E.g. US price: $599, EU price: €599. Using current course, $599 = €477. I'd be much happier if the entry-level mini were ~€499.
VAT included? US Sales Taxes are extra. Possibly avoidablelowpowercomputing wrote:E.g. US price: $599, EU price: €599. Using current course, $599 = €477. I'd be much happier if the entry-level mini were ~€499.
599 Euro<-->5148 Yuan vs. 599 USD<--> 4098.05 Yuan. (Disregarding engineering, this is really a Chinese product.)
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 3:05 am
- Location: Germany
Yep, 19% VAT is included. It was when I bought my last one from the German Apple Store. Hmm, if I add VAT to €477 I'm at €567.dougz wrote:VAT included? US Sales Taxes are extra. Possibly avoidablelowpowercomputing wrote:E.g. US price: $599, EU price: €599. Using current course, $599 = €477. I'd be much happier if the entry-level mini were ~€499.
599 Euro<-->5148 Yuan vs. 599 USD<--> 4098.05 Yuan. (Disregarding engineering, this is really a Chinese product.)
So is it really true that $599 is excluding US VAT?
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 3:05 am
- Location: Germany
1. Hardware-wise, maybe. Size-wise, not that sure.Matija wrote:Fact: You can build an equivalent system for less money.
Fact: You can *buy* an equivalent system for less money.
Fact: You can install a better OS on either of those two systems, be it Windows or Linux.
Those are the facts. I'm sorry if you can't see them, but they honestly are the simple facts.
2. Same as 1.
3. That's not a fact, it's an opinion. But it doesn't matter if X thinks that Y is a "better" OS than Z, so it's moot.
There is no national/federal (VAT/sales) tax in the U.S. Individual states have State Sales Taxes. Localities may add their own tax to the State tax. Most (not all) Internet sales are tax free.lowpowercomputing wrote: Yep, 19% VAT is included. It was when I bought my last one from the German Apple Store. Hmm, if I add VAT to €477 I'm at €567.
So is it really true that $599 is excluding US VAT?
I would expect that Amazon.com will sell it for US$599 - $25 discount & no tax for most U.S. customers.
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 3:05 am
- Location: Germany
Thanks for clearing that up. So my point ($599 < €599) still stands.dougz wrote:There is no national/federal (VAT/sales) tax in the U.S. Individual states have State Sales Taxes. Localities may add their own tax to the State tax. Most (not all) Internet sales are tax free.lowpowercomputing wrote: Yep, 19% VAT is included. It was when I bought my last one from the German Apple Store. Hmm, if I add VAT to €477 I'm at €567.
So is it really true that $599 is excluding US VAT?
I would expect that Amazon.com will sell it for US$599 - $25 discount & no tax for most U.S. customers.
For small values of "stands."lowpowercomputing wrote: Thanks for clearing that up. So my point ($599 < €599) still stands.
If I went to the local Richmond, Virginia Apple store I would pay US$599 list price + 5% tax. (Great store, sales droids are suspect, genius bar is excellent.)
I believe that California has the highest state tax at 7.25% plus some hefty local taxes. Might be as high as 9.5%, IIRC.
So, VAT is higher than highest U.S. tax rates, AFAIK. Therefore, the bulk of the difference is due to taxation!
Hard to beat Amazon price, at least after all of the old models are gone and they start discounting the new ones. Free shipping, too!
It would be better/cheaper to sell your current box and buy a new one. Old Minis hold excellent resale value.shleepy wrote:Question - how easy would it be to upgrade the internal components (for owners of older Mac Minis)? I don't imagine that Apple really likes users to do this, what with charging $175 to upgrade the HDD to one that costs ~$45 to consumers.
To upgrade, they would have to swap mobo (including video), CPU, and RAM (DDR3 vs. DDR2). HD extra. Superdrive extra.
BTW, a new case would be needed, due to different ports. PSU?
Given the markup on replacement parts and labor costs, it would be prohibitively expensive.
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 3:05 am
- Location: Germany
PowerPC models: RAM is very easy to upgrade, HDD and optical drive are a bit of a hassle, but doable. I've done RAM & HDD upgrades on mine.shleepy wrote:Question - how easy would it be to upgrade the internal components (for owners of older Mac Minis)? I don't imagine that Apple really likes users to do this, what with charging $175 to upgrade the HDD to one that costs ~$45 to consumers.
Intel models (as of now): RAM upgrade requires motherboard to be removed from the case, HDD & optical drive is more or less the same as on PPC. CPU can be upgraded too (socketed).
Opening the case requires a puttyknife or something similar (basically you need something wide and very thin to pray open the case).
Various videos of how to open PPC/x86 minis are floating around the net so you can get an impression of what's to be done.
Yes. Damn taxes... At least I can get a student discount which is 5% AFAIK.So, VAT is higher than highest U.S. tax rates, AFAIK. Therefore, the bulk of the difference is due to taxation!
http://lowendmac.com/deals/best-mac-mini-prices.htmldougz wrote:Old Minis hold excellent resale value.