Samsung v80 or p80?

Silencing hard drives, optical drives and other storage devices

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
ossar
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 1:56 am
Location: Sweden

Samsung v80 or p80?

Post by ossar » Sat Feb 05, 2005 1:59 am

Big difference in noise level? I'm not chasing high performance, but why buy a slower one of there is virtually no difference?

snutten
Posts: 341
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2002 1:27 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by snutten » Mon Feb 07, 2005 1:44 am

The V series need no cooling. No fan. No worries hanging it inside the case. It rules!

kesv
Posts: 300
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 8:44 am

Re: Samsung v80 or p80?

Post by kesv » Sun Feb 13, 2005 2:34 am

ossar wrote:Big difference in noise level? I'm not chasing high performance, but why buy a slower one of there is virtually no difference?
There is some difference:SR link

It's really depends on the kind of use you are going to be putting the drive into. For your main system drive I recommend going with the P-series, but the V-series makes an excellent backup, mp3 storage, etc. drive.

The V is a bit quieter and runs cooler so I'd expect it to be better for htpc use for example.

Pjotor
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 485
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 9:06 pm
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Post by Pjotor » Sun Feb 13, 2005 4:14 am

Of the ones I've seen, the P80 series rotate at 7,200 rpm and the V80's at 5,400 rpm. I have no idea how it affects I/O performance, though.

grandpa_boris
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 9:45 am
Location: CA

Post by grandpa_boris » Sun Feb 13, 2005 4:36 am

Pjotor wrote:Of the ones I've seen, the P80 series rotate at 7,200 rpm and the V80's at 5,400 rpm. I have no idea how it affects I/O performance, though.
going purely by the physics of it, V80 will have a worse rotational latency than P80. regardless of other disk features that improve performance (bigger cache, better firmware, better head assembly, more rigid and vibration-immune case), the P80 spins 25% faster. i would expect 10% or so faster access to small widely spread out chunks of data. for larger data accesses, which are dominated by the data transfer time, the difference will be less noticeable.

Post Reply