Foam/Sponge touching drive electronics = bad?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 7:49 pm
- Location: Australia
Foam/Sponge touching drive electronics = bad?
I've got some foam/sponge pieces - and thinking of resting the hard drive on top of the foam/sponge.
Is there any risk with the foam touching the bottom of the Samsung drive - i.e. the electronics/circuit board?
Is there any risk with the foam touching the bottom of the Samsung drive - i.e. the electronics/circuit board?
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 7:49 pm
- Location: Australia
\\oTibors wrote:I simply put the drive upside down. Now nothing touches the electronics. Since the bottom of a drive is hotter than the top, it cools better too.
\o/
o//
I do the same thing. I have used it right side up too but prefer upside down now. If you're still paranoid, you can test the foam with a multimeter which has fresh batteries.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 9:29 am
This is an immensly poor idea - in many cases manufacturers specify the orientation of drives and the specs I have read said all possible ways of mounting EXCEPT upside down. The drive head floats on a film of air just above the magnetic surface and inverting the precise relationship will ( I imagine) increase load (and therefore wear) on the read/write arm.Tibors wrote:I simply put the drive upside down. Now nothing touches the electronics. Since the bottom of a drive is hotter than the top, it cools better too.
Coco
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2003 6:28 pm
- Location: CT, USA
my drive rests on two slices of sorbothane. they are thin and long so they only touch the outer edges of the bottom of the drive... so nothing is in contact with the bottom electronics. then i set the whole thing on a flat piece of foam. this is mainly because the sorbo is sticky stuff and i don't like 'peeling' my drive off the case floor whenever i need to move it. though it probably does some further damping too. a nice bonus is that there is a channel for airflow both over and under the drive since the sorbo elevates the drive above the foam.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2004 11:32 am
Is that a fact or a WILD GUESS?I Should Coco wrote:This is an immensly poor idea - in many cases manufacturers specify the orientation of drives and the specs I have read said all possible ways of mounting EXCEPT upside down. The drive head floats on a film of air just above the magnetic surface and inverting the precise relationship will ( I imagine) increase load (and therefore wear) on the read/write arm.Tibors wrote:I simply put the drive upside down. Now nothing touches the electronics. Since the bottom of a drive is hotter than the top, it cools better too.
Coco
You can mount a drive any way you like without any "ill" and/or "side" effect!!!!!!
.
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 2674
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 6:07 am
- Location: Houten, The Netherlands, Europe
Have thought about the other half of all the drive heads? You know, the ones that are positioned under the platters.I Should Coco wrote:The drive head floats on a film of air just above the magnetic surface and inverting the precise relationship will ( I imagine) increase load (and therefore wear) on the read/write arm.
As I have pointed out several times now in these forums:
Not so long ago*, when almost all PC's were desktop models and the technology progressed from 5.25" HD's to 3.5" HD's, the majority of the 3.5" HD's were mounted on their sides to the left of the 5.25" drivebays. Seagate has stated for a long time that any right angle to gravity is OK for mounting a HD. And there are enough people who think that those right angles are not even necessary with modern FDB and notebook drives.
To recap: There is nothing wrong with putting your drive upside down
* I try not to feel like I am getting old.