SAMSUNG SpinPoint T166 HD321KJ 320GB is great

Silencing hard drives, optical drives and other storage devices

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
fyleow
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:23 pm
Location: California, USA

SAMSUNG SpinPoint T166 HD321KJ 320GB is great

Post by fyleow » Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:39 am

I was originally using the Samsung SpinPoint T 400 GB but I was setting up my file server and needed another 400 GB. I decided to risk it and purchased the new 320 GB version because it has 166GB/platter and 16 MB cache.

I'm using it right now and it's excellent. I think the idle noise is a tad quieter than the 400 GB and the seek noise is noticeably quieter. Seeks are duller and don't stand out as much.

Poodle
Posts: 254
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 3:17 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden.

Post by Poodle » Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:57 pm

Yeah the newest Samsungs have won me over from WD. I'm building a Raid5 array with four of the 400GB. :)


The perfomance is really close to the WDs only a lot cheaper.

computergeek22
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 3:18 pm

Post by computergeek22 » Fri Dec 22, 2006 4:05 pm

really considering this one. 320gb for 90 bucks. can't go wrong...

fyleow
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:23 pm
Location: California, USA

Post by fyleow » Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:41 pm

computergeek22 wrote:really considering this one. 320gb for 90 bucks. can't go wrong...
Performance is pretty good too, HD Tach scored around 67MB/s. That's really close to the 750GB Seagate so I guess the high density platters work. I'm running HD Tach and Windows on the same drive so I probably lost a few MB in the benchmark.

OlivierMDVY
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 5:53 am

Post by OlivierMDVY » Tue Jan 02, 2007 6:16 am

No reliability problem? I'm about to buy 2 Samsung T166 320gb to replace my current Raid 0 Raptors 74gb

winguy
Posts: 447
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:31 am

Post by winguy » Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:17 am

Hi,

What are the HDTach seek times for the HD321KJ with and without AAM?

fyleow
Posts: 175
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:23 pm
Location: California, USA

Post by fyleow » Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:17 am

winguy wrote:Hi,

What are the HDTach seek times for the HD321KJ with and without AAM?
16.6 with AAM 14.3 without AAM. I'm running Windows and the test on the Samsung so the benchmarked seek time is probably higher.
No reliability problem? I'm about to buy 2 Samsung T166 320gb to replace my current Raid 0 Raptors 74gb
I haven't heard any major complaints about quality and they come with a 3 year warranty. Before using the Samsungs I had a 150 GB Raptor and I'm happier with the Samsung.

Post Reply