Suggestions on the quietest SATA drive I can get for ~$50-60
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:00 am
Suggestions on the quietest SATA drive I can get for ~$50-60
I am currently using a 2.5" 80GB Hitachi SATA drive and can hardly ever hear it which I like. I need more storage space though, but I don't need anything more than 300, anything more is nice.
Can anyone recommend something that is going to very quiet like this 2.5" drive for around $50-60?
Can anyone recommend something that is going to very quiet like this 2.5" drive for around $50-60?
Re: Suggestions on the quietest SATA drive I can get for ~$5
My suggestion is to check out http://www.newegg.com. I have been shopping there for years and never had a problem. I saw a WD 500 GB for $65 including shipping. Good luck.SnowPunk98 wrote:I am currently using a 2.5" 80GB Hitachi SATA drive and can hardly ever hear it which I like. I need more storage space though, but I don't need anything more than 300, anything more is nice.
Can anyone recommend something that is going to very quiet like this 2.5" drive for around $50-60?
Re: Suggestions on the quietest SATA drive I can get for ~$5
My last 500 GB P7K700 was in that price range.SnowPunk98 wrote:Can anyone recommend something that is going to very quiet like this 2.5" drive for around $50-60?
3.5" SATA Drives, quietest to loudest (and slowest to fastest)
500 GB Western Digital WD5000AACS $65
250 GB Hitachi P7K500 $63
500 GB Hitachi P7K500 $70
250 GB Samsung S250 HD250HJ $56
320 GB Western Digital WD3200AAKS $60
320 GB Samsung F1 HD322HJ $64
The 250 GB WD2500AAJS $50 and WD2500AAKS $55 are neither as quiet nor as fast as anything above, but are decent enough for outdated drives.
Highly recommend spending a little more ($75) for a 640 GB WD6400AAKS if you want speed or a WD6400AACS for quiet capacity.
Probably most 2.5" 5400 rpm drives in the 80 to 160 GB range.
The WD6400AAKS is $69.99 with free shipping.
The 500GB Samsung F1 is $64.99 with free shipping.
The 500GB P7K500 is $59.99 with free shipping.
The 500GB Samsung F1 is $64.99 with free shipping.
The 500GB P7K500 is $59.99 with free shipping.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:00 am
No, its definitely 2 platter. I have 2 of them (bought several months apart), and they are the quietest drives I've owned (I haven't owned the 5400rpm drives.) They have a fairly slow 18ms access time, but are plenty fast for sustained transfers.SnowPunk98 wrote:I just bought the P7K500 that you linked, hopefully its fast and quiet. Do you know if this is a single platter model?
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:00 am
Not really, the single platter drives seem to be lower quality, so while they should be better they are actually worse (check out SPCR's WD3200AAKS review.)SnowPunk98 wrote:So multiple platters will make it louder correct? or what pros/cons does the numbers of platters have?
2-platter 3.5" drives always seem to the best.
My single platter Samsung S250 is fine, but it might be the exception, and the 2 platter P7K500 is quieter.
Last edited by QuietOC on Wed Nov 19, 2008 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:00 am
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:00 am
This is interesting... I was going to go for the single platter Hitachi on the grounds that it consumes less power than the two platter versions, and I'm never going to use more than 250Gb in my entire life (or not in the next five years at least...) If that version isn't so reliable, it might just change my decision.QuietOC wrote: Not really, the single platter drives seem to be lower quality, so while they should be better they are actually worse (check out SPCR's WD3200AAKS review.)
2-platter 3.5" drives always seem to the best.
My single platter Samsung S250 is fine, but it might be the exception, and the 2 platter P7K500 is quieter.
This WD drive has a single 320Gb platter. Most of the complaints about the Samsung F1 drives seem to be the ones with 334Gb platters. Looks like reliability reduces with the capacity of the platters. Maybe not. I'm speculating. BUT a higher data density is intuitively (to me) a risk.
The 250GB Hitachi P7K500 might be fine. So far it is only 320GB WD that we know has issues.Moon GT wrote:This is interesting... I was going to go for the single platter Hitachi on the grounds that it consumes less power than the two platter versions, and I'm never going to use more than 250Gb in my entire life (or not in the next five years at least...) If that version isn't so reliable, it might just change my decision.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 10:00 am