Zalman copycat from China
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12285
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Zalman copycat from China
It's a blatant copy of the Zalman 7000 series HS by a Chinese company called PCCooler, and they base their entire product line on this. Not only is the HS design copied, they've got a voltage controller that looks like a Zalman fanmate1, and even their website is obviously modelled on Zalman's.
http://www.pccooler.cn/product/images/e ... glish.html
Nope, NOT a Zalman, but a copycat.
Pricing is low enough that they have managed to find distributors and resellers in Europe and the US. eBuyer in the UK sells a copper variant for £7.63 inc VAT, and SVC in the US are selling at least 2 modles, the copper one at $25 and the alcu at $20. (Zalman's Z7000cu is priced by SVC at $39.)
While imitation is the highest form of flattery, it can sometimes be theft. This is not just imitation. I have learned that Zalman have sued for patent infringements in the EU and may take action in the US as well. Having been the subject of plagarism by unscrupulous sites in the past, I urge SPCR members and readers NOT to support PCCooler: Don't buy these products. A boycott of companies that sell these products (along with emails explaining why) may also be appropriate.
Zalman has been a pioneer and major proponent of quiet computing for years. They deserve our support.
http://www.pccooler.cn/product/images/e ... glish.html
Nope, NOT a Zalman, but a copycat.
Pricing is low enough that they have managed to find distributors and resellers in Europe and the US. eBuyer in the UK sells a copper variant for £7.63 inc VAT, and SVC in the US are selling at least 2 modles, the copper one at $25 and the alcu at $20. (Zalman's Z7000cu is priced by SVC at $39.)
While imitation is the highest form of flattery, it can sometimes be theft. This is not just imitation. I have learned that Zalman have sued for patent infringements in the EU and may take action in the US as well. Having been the subject of plagarism by unscrupulous sites in the past, I urge SPCR members and readers NOT to support PCCooler: Don't buy these products. A boycott of companies that sell these products (along with emails explaining why) may also be appropriate.
Zalman has been a pioneer and major proponent of quiet computing for years. They deserve our support.
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 2:51 am
- Location: Elk Grove, CA
- Contact:
and to make matters worse:
http://www.pccooler.cn/product/images/e ... _42cu.html
They were too lazy to figure out how to make it bigger (i.e., the 7700), and just decided "oh well, let's just slap on a huge fan on top of the thing".
Stupid. Not to be racist (I am Chinese, mind you), but I am disappointed.
EDIT: Even the DIAGRAMS, backplates, nipples, and other parts are nearly IDENTICAL / copied based upon Zalman's design. Ugh. I mean, I HAVE seen 7000 impersonations, but to make exact or near-exact imitations right down to nearly every aspect of Zalman... ugh...
EDIT #2: We are also not the first to notice this. There is a news link with ZALMAN on it on the website, which seems to lead to another site containing review/news of some sort, and from translating via BabelFish:
http://www.pccooler.cn/product/images/e ... _42cu.html
They were too lazy to figure out how to make it bigger (i.e., the 7700), and just decided "oh well, let's just slap on a huge fan on top of the thing".
Stupid. Not to be racist (I am Chinese, mind you), but I am disappointed.
EDIT: Even the DIAGRAMS, backplates, nipples, and other parts are nearly IDENTICAL / copied based upon Zalman's design. Ugh. I mean, I HAVE seen 7000 impersonations, but to make exact or near-exact imitations right down to nearly every aspect of Zalman... ugh...
EDIT #2: We are also not the first to notice this. There is a news link with ZALMAN on it on the website, which seems to lead to another site containing review/news of some sort, and from translating via BabelFish:
[ The IT168 evaluation ] the ultra frequency three (PCCooler) this sign relatively general consumers said that, without doubt is the very strange name, how well-known product and also is belongs to in the domestic not. But regarding the friend which makes the news media said that, this sign already was in domestic already has appeared, moreover in some very famous international IT website. Although present very many friends said this section product is the domestically produced goods, but this section product is in every sense of the term Chinese Taiwan product. But why do they on let the general consumers in the short time know? Actually the answer is in "the right infringement" in the question dispute, because ultra frequency three have two section main forces products and the international famous radiator brand ZALMAN two section main forces product, 7000ALCU and the 7000CU two section products are extremely similar, because of in a sense, this section product perhaps really is infringes upon the right the product. But certainly in not be technical and competition right infringement, but is in the contour and the appendix conflict.
-
- SPCR Reviewer
- Posts: 8636
- Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 6:33 am
- Location: Sunny SoCal
Re: Zalman copycat from China
That's a pisser to me. I'm going to drop SVC a line and let them know what I think about it. I suggest other SPCR readers do the same. Vote with your wallets guys.MikeC wrote:and SVC in the US are selling at least 2 modles, the copper one at $25 and the alcu at $20. (Zalman's Z7000cu is priced by SVC at $39.)
The fan looks different? are the copycats louder than the Zalmans?
Im really suprised that something like this could happen. In the US, litigation would have shut down a company like this before it produced a single HS. Guess things are different in China. Who wants to invest or trade with a country with crime or corruption. Practices like this cant be good for an economy.
Im really suprised that something like this could happen. In the US, litigation would have shut down a company like this before it produced a single HS. Guess things are different in China. Who wants to invest or trade with a country with crime or corruption. Practices like this cant be good for an economy.
It would be ironic, someone should get a sample and test it, for free of course, no-one should pay for a sample cause that would be supporting pccooler.
I wonder if its even close to as good as a zalman.
EDIT
read the "about us" section, it is funny
http://www.pccooler.cn/product/images/e ... /about.htm
I wonder if its even close to as good as a zalman.
EDIT
read the "about us" section, it is funny
http://www.pccooler.cn/product/images/e ... /about.htm
Even if it was as good as a Zalman, and even if I had a sample which proved it (I don't, don't get excited ) I wouldn't publish a report saying so, and I wouldn't pay for one, at any price. The only way to discourage such action is through your wallet.
Of course copycats are cheaper, they didn't have to pay for any of the R&D....
The loose Chinese copyright laws, combined with even looser enforcement has made left China literally full of these sorts of businesses, in nearly every industry. From electronics to pots-and-pans to CD's and DVD's, there is someone exporting a knockoff.
Of course copycats are cheaper, they didn't have to pay for any of the R&D....
The loose Chinese copyright laws, combined with even looser enforcement has made left China literally full of these sorts of businesses, in nearly every industry. From electronics to pots-and-pans to CD's and DVD's, there is someone exporting a knockoff.
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 2:57 am
- Location: East Anglia, UK
Hmmm.....
I seem to record not too long ago Thermalright was going to sue Themaltake because the Silent Booster looks similar to the SLK series. I also record most people here disagree with Thermalright so why all this fuss? A good cooler is derive from a combination of factors - looking similar is not necessary one of them. I think the best way to support Zalman is to review the copycat cooler and hopefully demonstrate that copying does not pay dividend.
Zalman should look at pccoolers design for mounting the copycat cooler to socket 462 - looks simple and effective. Two can play at the same game
I seem to record not too long ago Thermalright was going to sue Themaltake because the Silent Booster looks similar to the SLK series. I also record most people here disagree with Thermalright so why all this fuss? A good cooler is derive from a combination of factors - looking similar is not necessary one of them. I think the best way to support Zalman is to review the copycat cooler and hopefully demonstrate that copying does not pay dividend.
Zalman should look at pccoolers design for mounting the copycat cooler to socket 462 - looks simple and effective. Two can play at the same game
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 2:51 am
- Location: Elk Grove, CA
- Contact:
Hmm... the Silent Boost is REAL old (Trust me, I had it when the Athlon 1900+ was "super fast", i.e., top of the line). In any event, ThermalTake is a bad choice for anything except for loud (visually and acoustically) parts in my book.
*holds a spiked, rusty, and forked stake* "Who has the torches and lighter fluid? I feel like a good 'burnin BONFIRE"
*holds a spiked, rusty, and forked stake* "Who has the torches and lighter fluid? I feel like a good 'burnin BONFIRE"
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12285
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
It's a matter of degrees, isn't it? If you examined the SilentBoost vs the SLKs, there were similarities but you really could not call them identical. And both brands already had strong identities quite independent of the other.I seem to record not too long ago Thermalright was going to sue Themaltake because the Silent Booster looks similar to the SLK series. I also record most people here disagree with Thermalright so why all this fuss?
Here's it's almost a case of identity theft. Not quite because they did not take the name or logo, but they really did take just about everything else, and the design is so close to the 7000 that it could be mistaken for a 7000. Also, the copycat in this case has no identity or presence in the marketplace at all. The copy allows them to be associated in people's minds with Zalman and they therefor get the benefit of Zalman's goodwill.
I think there's a real big difference between this case and the one you cite.
Last edited by MikeC on Wed Jul 28, 2004 6:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2003 2:57 am
- Location: East Anglia, UK
I think it is fair to say in the computing industry everyone like to copy everyone, at least on the surface. What matters in the end is how the product performs and in this case another site has already reviewed the cooler (sorry, can't find it). I remembered it was no where near as good as the Zalman.MikeC wrote: Here's it's almost a case of identity theft. Not quite because they did not take the name or logo, but they really did take just about everything else, and the design is so close to the 7000 that it could be mistaken for a 7000. Also, the copycat in this case has no identity or presence in the marketplace at all. The copy allows them to be associated in people's minds with Zalman and they therefor get the benefit of Zalman's goodwill.
personally I think it looks different enough from the zalman that I can tell the difference. Regarding the copyright, I'm not making a comment.
Anyway, this isn't the first clone. Don't you guys remember the cyclone? Did they legally buy the rights? Or maybe the difference is SVC isn't selling it.
http://www.xpcgear.com/cyclone478.html
http://www.mge-usa.com/home/detail.asp? ... &iType=807 (MGE Cyclone, ALCU look-alike)
Zalman CNPS7000A-Alcu
The image MikeC posted at the top
It looks different. The Zalman looks more professional. I wonder which performs better though.
Anyway, this isn't the first clone. Don't you guys remember the cyclone? Did they legally buy the rights? Or maybe the difference is SVC isn't selling it.
http://www.xpcgear.com/cyclone478.html
http://www.mge-usa.com/home/detail.asp? ... &iType=807 (MGE Cyclone, ALCU look-alike)
Zalman CNPS7000A-Alcu
The image MikeC posted at the top
It looks different. The Zalman looks more professional. I wonder which performs better though.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12285
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
lenny,
If you check the discussion thread about the Sunbeam HDS here -- http://forums.silentpcreview.com/viewtopic.php?t=14615 -- you'll see that the device is marketed under at least one other name as well ('HDD Vibe-fixer from Sharkoon").
NoVibesIII has always expensive in US/Canada. It's a German brand. My guess is that they had an exclusive contract with a Far East manufacturer, and now that contract has expired, so it's being bought, branded and resold by lots of others.
Same thing happened with Antec's SX800/1000 series cases a few years back, Antec didn't make it themselves; they had an exclusive arrangement with an OEM case maker. Not a great agreement, it turns out, because it was not honored for long and the market was quickly flooded with virtually identical cases under all kinds of brands.
If you check the discussion thread about the Sunbeam HDS here -- http://forums.silentpcreview.com/viewtopic.php?t=14615 -- you'll see that the device is marketed under at least one other name as well ('HDD Vibe-fixer from Sharkoon").
NoVibesIII has always expensive in US/Canada. It's a German brand. My guess is that they had an exclusive contract with a Far East manufacturer, and now that contract has expired, so it's being bought, branded and resold by lots of others.
Same thing happened with Antec's SX800/1000 series cases a few years back, Antec didn't make it themselves; they had an exclusive arrangement with an OEM case maker. Not a great agreement, it turns out, because it was not honored for long and the market was quickly flooded with virtually identical cases under all kinds of brands.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 4:42 pm
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 8:48 am
- Location: Vienna
man, is PCcooler's company profile funny. So many spelling and grammar problems. Being chinese and used to horrible chinese-influenced english, I can almost hear someone trying to say it lol...I think I'll definately be with as very soon.FLUENCE electronics was found in November, 2003 in Shenzhen. And its main product is CPU cooler & accessories.
In the past two decades, we hardly found any changes in this field, either the appearance or performance.
That's not the trend of cause, and there must be a breakthrough.
Here we are---the patent product PA8C & PA9C Sevies CPU cooler with a bandnew desig a and performance!
All the CPU cooler we made are bearing the same feratures:
a. High effecience for heatsinking;
b. Stable and quiet in performane;
c. Widely compatible.
With a super valued price, we think you'll be with as very soon.
Well, I'm not surprised that there would be a heatsink design copy scandal. Besides, China is quite known for copied and renamed products.
-
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: USA (Phoenix, AZ)
i don't have one, but i've spoted such a comparsion in my native language and if you are interested i can make short translation (only essentials) for you.
You can find full article !!!IN POLISH!!! here:
http://www.tweak.pl/artykul/coolery_04_2
be prepared - no BABELFISH or GOOGLE translation for that language
...and head-to-head comparsion photos here:
http://www.tweak.pl/ilustracje/coolery_04/PICT0596.JPG
http://www.tweak.pl/ilustracje/coolery_04/PICT0597.JPG
mobo: ABIT NF7-SL v2.0 (NVIDIA nForce2 Ultra 400)
cpu: AMD Athlon XP 2800+ @ 2.39 GHz / 1.9V
heatsinks: "copycat ALCu" and "Zalman CNPS7000A-ALCu"
weight:
=====
copycat = 437g
zalman = 445
number of fins:
==========
copycat = 84
zalman = 130
high fan speed temp.(idle,load):
=====================
copycat = 50.5*C, 60.0*C, < 2800 rpm < 27 dbA**
zalman = 52.0*C, 60.0*C, < 2600 rpm < 25 dbA**
low fan speed temp.(idle,load):
====================
copycat = 61.0*C, 75.0*C, < 1700 rpm < 20 dbA**
zalman = 61.0*C, 74.0*C, < 1500 rpm < 20 dbA**
**i believe noise level comes from the product tech. spec.
You can find full article !!!IN POLISH!!! here:
http://www.tweak.pl/artykul/coolery_04_2
be prepared - no BABELFISH or GOOGLE translation for that language
...and head-to-head comparsion photos here:
http://www.tweak.pl/ilustracje/coolery_04/PICT0596.JPG
http://www.tweak.pl/ilustracje/coolery_04/PICT0597.JPG
mobo: ABIT NF7-SL v2.0 (NVIDIA nForce2 Ultra 400)
cpu: AMD Athlon XP 2800+ @ 2.39 GHz / 1.9V
heatsinks: "copycat ALCu" and "Zalman CNPS7000A-ALCu"
weight:
=====
copycat = 437g
zalman = 445
number of fins:
==========
copycat = 84
zalman = 130
high fan speed temp.(idle,load):
=====================
copycat = 50.5*C, 60.0*C, < 2800 rpm < 27 dbA**
zalman = 52.0*C, 60.0*C, < 2600 rpm < 25 dbA**
low fan speed temp.(idle,load):
====================
copycat = 61.0*C, 75.0*C, < 1700 rpm < 20 dbA**
zalman = 61.0*C, 74.0*C, < 1500 rpm < 20 dbA**
**i believe noise level comes from the product tech. spec.
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Dorchester, Dorset UK
very cheap at www.ebuyer.com
Well, you know what they say, "With a super valued price, we think you'll be with as very soon."very cheap at www.ebuyer.com Confused