Affordable 32GB SSD?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
Affordable 32GB SSD?
http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/03/21/32gb_ssd_samsung/
Would any of you guys consider this IF it was priced between $750 and $1000? That seems reasonable for 32GB of SS to me.
Would any of you guys consider this IF it was priced between $750 and $1000? That seems reasonable for 32GB of SS to me.
Re: Affordable 32GB SSD?
not for sound but for ruggedness. Assuming it was rugged.perplex wrote:http://www.tgdaily.com/2006/03/21/32gb_ssd_samsung/
Would any of you guys consider this IF it was priced between $750 and $1000? That seems reasonable for 32GB of SS to me.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:21 am
- Location: Raleigh, NC
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 5:30 am
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:21 am
- Location: Raleigh, NC
What about the ~ 10^6 writes limitation, did they fixed that?!
....
Well it seems not a big problem:
Longevity/Lifespan
Unlike DRAM, flash memory chips have a limited lifespan. Further, different flash chips have a different number of write cycles before errors start to occur. Flash chips with 300,000 write cycles are common, and currently the best flash chips are rated at 1,000,000 write cycles per block (with 8,000 blocks per chip). Now, just because a flash chip has a given write cycle rating, it doesn't mean that the chip will self-destruct as soon as that threshold is reached. It means that a flash chip with a 1 million Erase/Write endurance threshold limit will have only 0.02 percent of the sample population turn into a bad block when the write threshold is reached for that block. The better flash SSD manufacturers have two ways to increase the longevity of the drives: First, a "balancing" algorithm is used. This monitors how many times each disk block has been written. This will greatly extend the life of the drive. The better manufacturers have "wear-leveling" algorithms that balance the data intelligently, avoiding both exacerbating the wearing of the blocks and "thrashing" of the disk: When a given block has been written above a certain percentage threshold, the SSD will (in the background, avoiding performance decreases) swap the data in that block with the data in a block that has exhibited a "read-only-like" characteristic. Second, should bad blocks occur, they are mapped out as they would be on a rotating disk. With usage patterns of writing gigabytes per day, each flash-based SSD should last hundreds of years, depending on capacity. If it has a DRAM cache, it'll last even longer.
....
Well it seems not a big problem:
Longevity/Lifespan
Unlike DRAM, flash memory chips have a limited lifespan. Further, different flash chips have a different number of write cycles before errors start to occur. Flash chips with 300,000 write cycles are common, and currently the best flash chips are rated at 1,000,000 write cycles per block (with 8,000 blocks per chip). Now, just because a flash chip has a given write cycle rating, it doesn't mean that the chip will self-destruct as soon as that threshold is reached. It means that a flash chip with a 1 million Erase/Write endurance threshold limit will have only 0.02 percent of the sample population turn into a bad block when the write threshold is reached for that block. The better flash SSD manufacturers have two ways to increase the longevity of the drives: First, a "balancing" algorithm is used. This monitors how many times each disk block has been written. This will greatly extend the life of the drive. The better manufacturers have "wear-leveling" algorithms that balance the data intelligently, avoiding both exacerbating the wearing of the blocks and "thrashing" of the disk: When a given block has been written above a certain percentage threshold, the SSD will (in the background, avoiding performance decreases) swap the data in that block with the data in a block that has exhibited a "read-only-like" characteristic. Second, should bad blocks occur, they are mapped out as they would be on a rotating disk. With usage patterns of writing gigabytes per day, each flash-based SSD should last hundreds of years, depending on capacity. If it has a DRAM cache, it'll last even longer.
if it was ~$100, i could see myself thinking about it. give it 3 years and it will be perhaps.. but by then i dont know if i'll be able to deal with 32GB as an OS/games/programs drive.. without any games, i'm sure i could thou..
i really don't see the market for these at the $750-1000 mark.. far too expensive for thin-and-light tablet PCs, the best application IMO.. and anyone with a power-laptop will want a 160GB+ hdd too..
if it does >100MB/s sustained transfer then it will be of interest to the performance PC enthusiast, which is one area it could sell in.. but still not much then i expect.
and the silent PC guy.. i think it needs to come down a bit to justify itself above 2.5" + enclosure.
so is this essentially a CF card.. or other form factor?
i really don't see the market for these at the $750-1000 mark.. far too expensive for thin-and-light tablet PCs, the best application IMO.. and anyone with a power-laptop will want a 160GB+ hdd too..
if it does >100MB/s sustained transfer then it will be of interest to the performance PC enthusiast, which is one area it could sell in.. but still not much then i expect.
and the silent PC guy.. i think it needs to come down a bit to justify itself above 2.5" + enclosure.
so is this essentially a CF card.. or other form factor?
Cost
I definitely scanned the article and thought: "The only thing that matters in this article is price...which they left out."
I mean, SSdrives are already available- just outside of reasonable price range. This announcement doesn't really give much of a hint as to what the price will be.
I mean, SSdrives are already available- just outside of reasonable price range. This announcement doesn't really give much of a hint as to what the price will be.
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:04 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
I guess that price range is reasonable. Given that 1GB CF cards are $45 it would cost you $1440 to get 32 CF cards for an array. $750 is probably in the ballpark.
Still, this is only a 1.8" drive. For a laptop I'd want a 2.5" drive, and that ought to be in the 64-128GB range to be usable.
I guess there's still a question of who the real market is for these things. I suppose if you were building a play-only media PC you could use an iRAM as a boot disk and get everything else over a network. I don't know who besides laptop/mobile users really need a SSD.
Still, this is only a 1.8" drive. For a laptop I'd want a 2.5" drive, and that ought to be in the 64-128GB range to be usable.
I guess there's still a question of who the real market is for these things. I suppose if you were building a play-only media PC you could use an iRAM as a boot disk and get everything else over a network. I don't know who besides laptop/mobile users really need a SSD.
it appears that transcend just released a couple 1.8" and 2.5" flash hard drives. the size is limited to 2, 4, and 8 gb, but it would be adequate to place the os on it to allow faster boot up. http://www.transcendusa.com/products/Mo ... ?ModNo=100
any one have any experience with these flash drives?
the price that the 4gb 2.5" drive is going for (~368 USD), the 32gb drive doesnt look that expensive afterall
any one have any experience with these flash drives?
the price that the 4gb 2.5" drive is going for (~368 USD), the 32gb drive doesnt look that expensive afterall
Those things are junk when it comes to performance. Downloading and reviewing the data sheet reveals the drives use PIO4 mode, like a floppy drive, with a max 16MB/sec transfer rate. Lacking DMA mode, read and writes will be taxing on system resources just like using a floppy. High priced - little performance. Stick a Samsung MP0402H in a Smart Drive. It'll be larger, faster, less expensive, and just as silent.bbzidane wrote:it appears that transcend just released a couple 1.8" and 2.5" flash hard drives. the size is limited to 2, 4, and 8 gb, but it would be adequate to place the os on it to allow faster boot up. http://www.transcendusa.com/products/Mo ... ?ModNo=100
any one have any experience with these flash drives?
the price that the 4gb 2.5" drive is going for (~368 USD), the 32gb drive doesnt look that expensive afterall
The key to look for in these new Flash drives is Ultra DMA (Direct Memory Access) mode - just like your hard drive uses. UDMA 66, 100, 133, etc. Even better is SATA and SATA2.
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:04 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
That Transcend product is pathetic, considering you can buy a CF to IDE adapter for $20 and get a 4GB CF card for $100.
http://linitx.com/product_info.php?products_id=307
http://www.cfide.co.uk/compact_flash_ide_adapters.shtml
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductLi ... tegory=353
PIO, yeah, another strike. Geeze, even my old Atari had DMA for the floppy disk, PC standards are so pathetically lame.
http://linitx.com/product_info.php?products_id=307
http://www.cfide.co.uk/compact_flash_ide_adapters.shtml
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductLi ... tegory=353
PIO, yeah, another strike. Geeze, even my old Atari had DMA for the floppy disk, PC standards are so pathetically lame.
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:04 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
Ah, this is what I was thinking of before, supports DMA...
http://www.acscontrol.com/Index_ACS.asp ... dapter.htm
http://www.acscontrol.com/Index_ACS.asp ... dapter.htm
-
- Posts: 2049
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 11:06 am
- Location: Klamath Falls, OR
At what speed? No info on that vital subject.highlandsun wrote:Ah, this is what I was thinking of before, supports DMA...
http://www.acscontrol.com/Index_ACS.asp ... dapter.htm
I bought a Sybex CF-IDE adapter ($10 at Newegg) and a $25 512MB 140X flash card (24MB/s read, 16MB/s write) but it added about 80 seconds to the DOS boot time, and stuck at "0% confirmed" when I tried to run FDISK. So my first attempt at using a CF-IDE as the #2 disk for the swap file was unsuccessful.
I hope anybody who actually gets one of these things working under DMA posts here and lets us know about it. I'm very interested in this stuff, as witness my first (unsuccessful) $35 experiment!
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 2:04 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
Speed just depends on the flash card and its internal controller chip. The adapter is nothing more than a pin map, connecting one connector to the other.
This Sandisk doc mentions 16MB/sec peak on the host interface.
http://www.sandisk.com/Assets/File/OEM/ ... hv11.0.pdf
This would be a poor choice for a swap drive, especially given the wear limits and the slow overall speed.
This Sandisk doc mentions 16MB/sec peak on the host interface.
http://www.sandisk.com/Assets/File/OEM/ ... hv11.0.pdf
This would be a poor choice for a swap drive, especially given the wear limits and the slow overall speed.