Welcome new members
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact:
Nope, these are bone stock machines. I found a very long thread on the 0x7b error I experienced and it seems to be somewhat common with the SMP beta client.
Code: Select all
[22:24:41] Warning: long 1-4 interactions
[22:24:41] Gromacs cannot continue further.
[22:24:41] Going to send back what have done.
[22:24:41] logfile size: 354424
[22:24:41] - Writing 354960 bytes of core data to disk...
[22:24:41] ... Done.
[22:24:41] - Failed to delete work/wudata_05.sas
[22:24:41] - Failed to delete work/wudata_05.goe
[22:24:41] - Failed to delete work/wudata_05.pdo
[22:24:41] - Failed to delete work/wudata_05.xvg
[22:24:41] Warning: check for stray files
[22:24:41]
[22:24:41] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[22:24:41]
[22:24:41] Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
[22:24:45] CoreStatus = 7B (123)
[22:24:45] Client-core communications error: ERROR 0x7b
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact:
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact:
Hello,
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=251911
I "vote" for a native Linux boot, as long as you have the choice! Thanks for the team boost!
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=251911
I "vote" for a native Linux boot, as long as you have the choice! Thanks for the team boost!
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
- Location: Undisclosed but sober in US
Wow, #1 with a bulletvg30et wrote:Just joined and managed to get a few decent machines folding.
One thing that has me quite disappointed is the large amount of communications errors and discarded WU's I keep seeing. It's not fun losing several k in points just from errors.
I've "folded" quite a bit in the past for dnetc and never saw these kinds of issues. Hope I'll get these solved and can soldier on for the team.
Fold man, fold
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact:
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact:
Welcome to SPCR Folds!
Your first work unit has shown up:
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=262523
...but maybe there was a problem? 'Cuz it is only 1 point -- keep on Folding; it'll get much better.
Your first work unit has shown up:
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=262523
...but maybe there was a problem? 'Cuz it is only 1 point -- keep on Folding; it'll get much better.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact:
mexell -- welcome to SPCR Folds!
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=262797
We're back up (a little) to 122 active members.
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=262797
We're back up (a little) to 122 active members.
Hello,
I am a bit confused by the scoring system of this whole folding thing. I just started folding using the FAH504-Console and it downloaded a WU of 1000000 steps, now I loaded this into FAHMon to monitor progress and it has a preferred deadline of September 2 with a credit of 230 (!!) points.
Previously I was using the Windows SMP client (until my machine decided it was time to reboot) and was working on a WU with 500000 steps and it had a credit of ~1700 points.
So how do they actually figure out these scores, shouldn't WU's that are bigger score more points?
Thanks
I am a bit confused by the scoring system of this whole folding thing. I just started folding using the FAH504-Console and it downloaded a WU of 1000000 steps, now I loaded this into FAHMon to monitor progress and it has a preferred deadline of September 2 with a credit of 230 (!!) points.
Previously I was using the Windows SMP client (until my machine decided it was time to reboot) and was working on a WU with 500000 steps and it had a credit of ~1700 points.
So how do they actually figure out these scores, shouldn't WU's that are bigger score more points?
Thanks
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:49 pm
Hey Guys,
I just joined the whole "Folding@Home" project. I also added SPCR's team number.
I have to say, how come I have never heard of this before? There should be a big worldwide campaign about this. I know for sure like 95% of the people never heard of this project. This is one of the easiest ways to contribute to a good cause.
Any way, this is my first post on SPCR as well. I recently discovered SPCR when I started ordering my new system a week ago and was aiming to build a quiet system (I will post pics en specs later when I received it all, waiting on the E6750 chip).
I wanne say you guys have done a great job with SPCR and the forum. I've hours and hours reading usefull forum topics here and helped me alot with buying the good gear for my system. Keep up the good work guys and cya around!
I just joined the whole "Folding@Home" project. I also added SPCR's team number.
I have to say, how come I have never heard of this before? There should be a big worldwide campaign about this. I know for sure like 95% of the people never heard of this project. This is one of the easiest ways to contribute to a good cause.
Any way, this is my first post on SPCR as well. I recently discovered SPCR when I started ordering my new system a week ago and was aiming to build a quiet system (I will post pics en specs later when I received it all, waiting on the E6750 chip).
I wanne say you guys have done a great job with SPCR and the forum. I've hours and hours reading usefull forum topics here and helped me alot with buying the good gear for my system. Keep up the good work guys and cya around!
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact:
Greetings,
There is a lot more to it, than the number of steps -- the complexity of the molecule and what it is doing at each step, all are different for each project. There are different cores, and many different projects. The points are awarded based on how a particular machine handles it -- and different CPU's run them at different speeds.alfhenrik wrote:I am a bit confused by the scoring system of this whole folding thing. I just started folding using the FAH504-Console and it downloaded a WU of 1000000 steps, now I loaded this into FAHMon to monitor progress and it has a preferred deadline of September 2 with a credit of 230 (!!) points.
Previously I was using the Windows SMP client (until my machine decided it was time to reboot) and was working on a WU with 500000 steps and it had a credit of ~1700 points.
So how do they actually figure out these scores, shouldn't WU's that are bigger score more points?
Thanks
Hi Neil,
I just finished my first WU 10 minutes ago and am now folding away 24/7 pretty much.
Thanks
Thanks for the explanation, I am still new to this and unsure of how the points system actually works.NeilBlanchard wrote:There is a lot more to it, than the number of steps -- the complexity of the molecule and what it is doing at each step, all are different for each project. There are different cores, and many different projects. The points are awarded based on how a particular machine handles it -- and different CPU's run them at different speeds.
I just finished my first WU 10 minutes ago and am now folding away 24/7 pretty much.
Thanks
Alright, thanks for that.
Now, does anyone know how to use the GPU client? I have the ATI X1950 Pro that I thought I'd put to good use. I have started it up with the -gpu 0 -local -verbosity 9 parameters, it gets to the "Starting GUI server" line and then it doesn't seem to go any further...
Also, does any one know of any tool that minimizes a command window to the notification area?
Thanks a lot guys!
Now, does anyone know how to use the GPU client? I have the ATI X1950 Pro that I thought I'd put to good use. I have started it up with the -gpu 0 -local -verbosity 9 parameters, it gets to the "Starting GUI server" line and then it doesn't seem to go any further...
Also, does any one know of any tool that minimizes a command window to the notification area?
Thanks a lot guys!
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact:
Hello ohlenc & welcome to SPCR Folds!
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=262931
To answer about the GPU client -- it really cannot be run at the same time as the SMP client, as it requires a fair bit of the CPU. You could run the GPU with the single CPU client, but the GPU client doesn't shut off automatically when you want to use the machine. And, I think the SMP client is faster, anyway.
So, I'd stick with the SMP client, if you can run it.
http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/ ... =&u=262931
To answer about the GPU client -- it really cannot be run at the same time as the SMP client, as it requires a fair bit of the CPU. You could run the GPU with the single CPU client, but the GPU client doesn't shut off automatically when you want to use the machine. And, I think the SMP client is faster, anyway.
So, I'd stick with the SMP client, if you can run it.
Hi,
I'm a bit disappointed with the SMP client, this morning when I woke up I went to check if it had completed the WU it was working on when I went to bed (it was at ~80%), when I check FAHMon it had downloaded a new WU so I thought great, I'll check my stats, to my surprise they had not changed so I checked the log and found that at 95% it had a checksum error and ultimately got the FILE_IO_ERROR.
What would cause checksum errors and FILE_IO_ERROR (apart from bad hard drives, which mine aren't as they are brand new and they are working fine)
Thanks.
I'm a bit disappointed with the SMP client, this morning when I woke up I went to check if it had completed the WU it was working on when I went to bed (it was at ~80%), when I check FAHMon it had downloaded a new WU so I thought great, I'll check my stats, to my surprise they had not changed so I checked the log and found that at 95% it had a checksum error and ultimately got the FILE_IO_ERROR.
What would cause checksum errors and FILE_IO_ERROR (apart from bad hard drives, which mine aren't as they are brand new and they are working fine)
Thanks.
Hi, I see you have a pretty heavy OC on the machine in your sig. Is it 12 hours Orthos stable? Any problems with heat or stability? Have you run any health checks on the hard drives?
If you remember the project number you can check the FAH forums or google and see if anyone else has had that error with that WU.
Here's a good place to start, with error codes and descriptions:
http://fahwiki.net/index.php/CoreStatus_codes
Good luck, don't give up!
If you remember the project number you can check the FAH forums or google and see if anyone else has had that error with that WU.
Here's a good place to start, with error codes and descriptions:
http://fahwiki.net/index.php/CoreStatus_codes
Good luck, don't give up!
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
- Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
- Contact: