I dont game should I get 8400GS, 7300gt, or something else?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: US
I dont game should I get 8400GS, 7300gt, or something else?
I need a new PCI Express graphics card, I do not game, and I don't have built in Video. I mainly do photo editing, Watch DVD's, and surf the web. I run Windows XPsp2 and I have a Viewsonic 19" widescreen LCD running 1440x900
I would like something passive cooled and on the cheap side and I was looking at the following cards at Newegg.
7300GT link
730GS (10 dollars cheaper then the GT) Link
8400GS Link
I would like something passive cooled and on the cheap side and I was looking at the following cards at Newegg.
7300GT link
730GS (10 dollars cheaper then the GT) Link
8400GS Link
I would have thought it was a no-brainer. The only real difference is DX9 vs. DX10. Sure you may use XP, but the 8400GS should run a tiny bit faster than either 7300. Or you could upgrade your motherboard with the money and get something integrated (will obviously cost you more, but could save you some money if you are thinking of building a new computer any time soon).
-
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:28 pm
- Location: USA
I second the 8400GS. Only $10 more than the 7300GS and the H264 acceleration may come in handy down the road. 7300GT is not even worth considering, as its only advantage over the 7300GS is better 3D acceleration (games). What about a HD2400Pro, though? $5 cheaper than the 8400GS and, I believe, lower idle power consumption. Also, most people claim that the AMD/ATI video output looks nicer than Nvidia.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:01 pm
- Location: US
Yea I bought a 2400xp but for some reason Im getting allot of eye strain with it. I tried drivers, brightness settings, anything I can think of to no avail. I go back to my old Geforce 6200 and I'm fine, so I was just going to get a new Nvidia card.jessekopelman wrote:I second the 8400GS. Only $10 more than the 7300GS and the H264 acceleration may come in handy down the road. 7300GT is not even worth considering, as its only advantage over the 7300GS is better 3D acceleration (games). What about a HD2400Pro, though? $5 cheaper than the 8400GS and, I believe, lower idle power consumption. Also, most people claim that the AMD/ATI video output looks nicer than Nvidia.
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:46 am
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:46 am
I'm in a similar situation.
I want the "sweet spot" video card for a Tivo-like box that will run 24/7.
It gets HOT where I live, so I need low electricity consumption.
I don't want to add to the cooling requirements my house already has.
Where is the real sweet spot for A/V performance versus energy consumption?
From: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000662.html
I want the "sweet spot" video card for a Tivo-like box that will run 24/7.
It gets HOT where I live, so I need low electricity consumption.
I don't want to add to the cooling requirements my house already has.
Where is the real sweet spot for A/V performance versus energy consumption?
From: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000662.html
-
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:28 pm
- Location: USA
For a "Tivo-like" box, your best bet is just using a motherboard with integrated graphics. All recent Intel, NVidia, and AMD integrated solutions are fine for playing video unless it's very heavy duty 1080p stuff.Tommy Jefferson wrote:I'm in a similar situation.
I want the "sweet spot" video card for a Tivo-like box that will run 24/7.
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:46 am
-
- Posts: 1406
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:28 pm
- Location: USA
First off, you can get integrated solutions with either HDMI or DVI. Second, DVI and HDMI are compatible -- you can buy inexpensive cables that are DVI at one and and HDMI at another. Third, while new standards will always come along, HDMI isn't going anywhere anytime soon. You will note that many TVs still have component, S-Video, and composite inputs despite all of these being "obsoleted" by HDMI. Unlike PCs, A/V equipment is expected to have a useful life of 10 years and great effort is made for backwards compatibility in input/outputs. Fourth, if your integrated video does become obsolete before the rest of your HTPC (unlikely), you can then disable it and add a PCI-E video card that has the latest and greatest.Tommy Jefferson wrote:I thought about going that route, but video standards are in a state of transition.
I would like to be able to switch to HDMI, DVI, or whatever in a couple of years when the High Definition formats get settled down.
If you want to run vista with aero, get at least 128mb ram onboard, the minimum requirement.
linux Compiz can also use some video memory.
Video / DVD playback is greatly influenced by the GPU, a little bit of research into that area can prevent you from "disasters".
I do need a register tweak every time I upgrade the driver from my atix1950pro to watch TV with an acceptable image quality. (I have to disable the post processing)
linux Compiz can also use some video memory.
Video / DVD playback is greatly influenced by the GPU, a little bit of research into that area can prevent you from "disasters".
I do need a register tweak every time I upgrade the driver from my atix1950pro to watch TV with an acceptable image quality. (I have to disable the post processing)