Dont understand...hd4850 10w idle @ 68c

They make noise, too.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
drjunk
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:46 am
Location: Scotland

Dont understand...hd4850 10w idle @ 68c

Post by drjunk » Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:53 pm

Looking at some early info about amds upcoming hd4850 graphics card. Some people have got these cards early and are reporting idle temps at around 68c. I thought these cards were to burn around 10w idle?
Viewsonic VP930 Lcd, Thermaltake (Black) Armor Case, A7N8X-E Deluxe, 2500XP Barton, Thermalright SI-97 With 92mm Vantec Tornado Fan, 1Gb Patriot PC3200 Dual Channel Low Latency Ram, Sapphire Radeon 9800SE (256bit), Zalman ZM80D-HP Gpu Cooler With ZM-OP1 80mm Fan, 250Gb Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 SATA NCQ, Pioneer DVR-109 dvd-r.

nutball
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2003 7:16 am
Location: en.gb.uk

Post by nutball » Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:24 pm

The one isn't automatically incompatible with the other.

jaganath
Posts: 5085
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 6:55 am
Location: UK

Post by jaganath » Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:06 am

nutball wrote:The one isn't automatically incompatible with the other.
the cooling solution would have to be almost absurdly bad to hit ~70C with only 10W of heat. also, given they're supposed to pull 100W+ at max load, the card would likely burst into flames if the cooling solution is that bad. seems more likely the temp measurement is just wrong.
[size=75]JFK:
What do our opponents mean when they apply to us the label "Liberal?" If by "Liberal" they mean...someone who looks ahead, who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions,who cares about the welfare of the people, who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad...then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal."[/size]

Modo
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 3:32 am
Location: Poland

Post by Modo » Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:45 am

All you need to reach these temperatures, is a fan-based cooling solution that has the fan switched off during idle operation.
Can you keep it down? I'm having trouble hearing the artillery.

Current rig
Old PC

Cryoburner
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:25 am

Post by Cryoburner » Sat Jun 14, 2008 5:27 am

One possibility is that the people reporting this are using Vista's Aero Glass interface. Since the GUI is rendered by 3D Hardware, the card might not be getting a chance to enter idle mode, and is therefore using much more than 10 watts of power. That's just speculation, of course.

loimlo
Posts: 762
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 3:58 am
Location: Formosa

Post by loimlo » Sat Jun 14, 2008 9:56 am

3850's reference single slot cooler had the similar situation, 65'c, at idle. It looks like ATi implement the same temperature-controlling mechanism on 4850 as well. Anyway, I wonder whether 4850 enjoy the same quiet cooler design as 3850 that has been verified by silent authority, SPCR.

nutball
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 1304
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2003 7:16 am
Location: en.gb.uk

Post by nutball » Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:02 am

jaganath wrote:the cooling solution would have to be almost absurdly bad to hit ~70C with only 10W of heat. also, given they're supposed to pull 100W+ at max load, the card would likely burst into flames if the cooling solution is that bad. seems more likely the temp measurement is just wrong.
Well we have (in this thread at least!) very little information about what the cooling was in the tests reported.

The shots of HD4850 cards I've seen are your typical 1-slot graphics card heatsinks, with a plastic cover and a fan. Quite clearly optimised for high-heat, high-airflow. Turn the fan off, then what? No forced air cooling, no convective cooling, what are you left with? Conductive cooling through a couple of bits of plastic and fibreglass?!

rpsgc
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1630
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 1:59 am
Location: Portugal

Post by rpsgc » Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:12 am

HD3850
HD4850

Spot the differences ;)

(Actually AFAIK the only difference is that there is an opening at the top of the cooler to let hot air out)
Fractal Define R4 | Corsair AX750 | MSI Z97 Gaming 5 | Intel Core i7 4770K w/TRUE 120 Rev. C | 16GB G.Skill Sniper DDR3-1866 | Sapphire Nitro+ RX 480 8GB OC | Crucial m4 128GB + Crucial MX100 512GB + WD Blue 1TB + WD Red 4TB | JVC HA-RX900 | Dell U2312HM + BenQ G2400WD | Asus Echelon Mechanical Keyboard | Logitech G400s

Matija
Posts: 780
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:17 am
Location: Croatia

Post by Matija » Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:57 am

I've just realized something...

3870 TDP: 105W
4850 TDP: 110W

Maybe we'll be able to cool the 4850 passively... If that's the case, then I've definitely found my next graphics card.

ryboto
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1439
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: New Hampshire, US
Contact:

Post by ryboto » Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:33 am

rpsgc wrote:HD3850
HD4850

Spot the differences ;)

(Actually AFAIK the only difference is that there is an opening at the top of the cooler to let hot air out)
the 4850 has a larger fan. As to the power consumption...while the 3870 was 105W, Xbit labs tests it as only really consuming ~85W at load. I'm hoping AMD overestimated the 4850 TDP as well.
[url=http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=userpage&teamnum=31574&username=rybot]F@H[/url]
[url=http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=36172&highlight=][size=75]Oldest Setup[/url]
[url=http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=48778]Old[/url]
i5-750 | TR AXP-140 | DFI MI P55-T36 | Lan-Gear mITX | HD5850 | Silverstone ST45SF[/size]

Matija
Posts: 780
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:17 am
Location: Croatia

Post by Matija » Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:00 pm

Or not, if this preview is correct:

http://www.hardware.fr/articles/724-2/p ... -4850.html

Image

But who knows, maybe it was a different system...

Ant6n
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:48 pm

Post by Ant6n » Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:24 pm

rpsgc wrote:HD3850
HD4850

Spot the differences ;)
That 4850 is quite a blurry card, me thinks :wink:
4850 for <100 Watts would be awsome; maybe I could run that together with my (mobile) core duo, and a 2.5" hdd on my 220 Watt brick (more than half the power consumption taken by the card :D).
Regarding the test; maybe the 3870 bottlenecks the system such that the cpu can't work at full throttle, possibly causing less power consumption than expected, but not directly related to gfx power consumption

Mikey
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:14 pm

Re: Dont understand...hd4850 10w idle @ 68c

Post by Mikey » Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:38 pm

drjunk wrote:Looking at some early info about amds upcoming hd4850 graphics card. Some people have got these cards early and are reporting idle temps at around 68c. I thought these cards were to burn around 10w idle?
Apparently the fan profile turns on late and turns on slow, so the card will get that hot.

Couple of guys on OCAU have 4850's already, and claim that changing the thermal compound to AS-5 has given a 20deg drop at idle, 10-15 at load for temps.

When it comes down to it it is a pretty basic cooler though, it's not meant to be the high-end even though it performs that way. ;)

Personally i can't wait to see what the 4870 can do, I have a feeling we may see passive versions of both. I figure if my 8800GT can run passive, they can. :)

dragmor
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: Oz

Post by dragmor » Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:15 pm

The Cat 8.5 drivers (not sure about 8.6) don't have the HD48x0 cards power play activated so the cards voltage and frequency are not throttling down but the fan is.

Matija
Posts: 780
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:17 am
Location: Croatia

Post by Matija » Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:48 pm

dragmor wrote:The Cat 8.5 drivers (not sure about 8.6) don't have the HD48x0 cards power play activated so the cards voltage and frequency are not throttling down but the fan is.
Good news :)

I've found out that the mounting holes are the same as on the 38xx cards, so standard coolers will fit.

Matija
Posts: 780
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:17 am
Location: Croatia

Post by Matija » Thu Jun 19, 2008 2:13 am


Vicotnik
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 1822
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:53 am
Location: Sweden

Post by Vicotnik » Thu Jun 19, 2008 5:26 am

I hope throttling is disabled in AMD Catalyst RV770 Beta used in the PC Perspective preview Matija links to. Otherwise those numbers are less than impressive.
Main: ASRock B85M-ITX | i3-4330 | 16GB DDR3 | Intel 730 240GB | HDPLEX H1-S | picoPSU | No moving parts | Idle 13.9W
HTPC: ASRock J4105-ITX | 4GB DDR4 | Intel 535 120GB | picoPSU | No moving parts
Gaming: Intel DH77EB | i5-3570K | GTX 1060 6GB | 16GB DDR3 | TJ08-E | RM750X
Server: ASRock N3150-ITX | ~30TB | G-360 | Idle ~25W

thejamppa
Posts: 3142
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:20 am
Location: Missing in Finnish wilderness, howling to moon with wolf brethren and walking with brother bears
Contact:

Post by thejamppa » Thu Jun 19, 2008 6:25 am

Let's see there's still time for the official launch and new catalysts just came yesterday...
If seeing is believing, how can blind person believe in anything?
Maturity is just not experience in life but also ability to make compromises.

Matija
Posts: 780
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:17 am
Location: Croatia

Post by Matija » Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:03 am

Unfortunately, I think the 110W TDP is correct. The 4850 used more juice than an overclocked 8800... As far as passive cooling goes, I don't think it will be possible.

rpsgc
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1630
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 1:59 am
Location: Portugal

Post by rpsgc » Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:15 am

Another power consumption graph:

Image


Source: Hardware.fr




It doesn't use much more power than a 8800GT... passive cooling is still worth a try IMO.
Fractal Define R4 | Corsair AX750 | MSI Z97 Gaming 5 | Intel Core i7 4770K w/TRUE 120 Rev. C | 16GB G.Skill Sniper DDR3-1866 | Sapphire Nitro+ RX 480 8GB OC | Crucial m4 128GB + Crucial MX100 512GB + WD Blue 1TB + WD Red 4TB | JVC HA-RX900 | Dell U2312HM + BenQ G2400WD | Asus Echelon Mechanical Keyboard | Logitech G400s

Matija
Posts: 780
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:17 am
Location: Croatia

Post by Matija » Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:38 am

I linked that one earlier in the thread ;) Notice 352W system load compared to 319W with the HD3870.

But, things just get more and more weird.

http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-ati-r ... wercolor/7
HD 2900 XT 391 Watt
Radeon HD 3850 259 Watt
Radeon HD 4850 Force3D 269 Watt
Radeon HD 4850 Powercolor 269 Watt

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/HD_4850/21.html
Image
Image


Looks like we're going to have to wait for a while, until Xbitlabs gives us exact power consumption figures.

andyb
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Essex, England

Post by andyb » Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:13 am

All things considered AMD seem to have had a bit of a cockup with this one.

Its directly comparable to the 8800GT in the following ways.

Price.
Performance.
Power Consumption.

So why would anyone actually buy one of these over the competition (excluding fanboys and people who prefer red to green).

The 8800GT is an established item in the market, I just dont get what AMD has brought to the table with this item, its not faster as the same price point, and its not cheaper at the same performance.??? Someone please enlighten me.

On that note, the 4870 benchmarks, tests etc etc have not hit the net yet, will that be as intimidating (sarcasm!) to nVidia as the 4850 seems to be.

nVidia are also about to launch (in a months time) a re-hash of the 9800 GTX called the 9800 GTX+, which is really going to make AMD hurt if the 4870 fails to deliver.

http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/ ... x9800-tips


Andy
Main PC, P180, CM Silent Pro 500M, i5 3570k @ 4.2Ghz, 8-GB @ 2,400MHz, 512GB 850 EVO, 500 Extreme II, 2x 2.5" drives, MSI 660Ti Twin Frozr.
Server, under reconstruction, 380W Enermax Pro82+, positive pressure only.

rpsgc
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1630
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 1:59 am
Location: Portugal

Post by rpsgc » Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:30 am

andyb wrote:(...)
HD4850 comparable to the 8800GT in performance?! :shock: What planet are you on? It matches the 9800GTX in performance!


Image


Average performance.
Fractal Define R4 | Corsair AX750 | MSI Z97 Gaming 5 | Intel Core i7 4770K w/TRUE 120 Rev. C | 16GB G.Skill Sniper DDR3-1866 | Sapphire Nitro+ RX 480 8GB OC | Crucial m4 128GB + Crucial MX100 512GB + WD Blue 1TB + WD Red 4TB | JVC HA-RX900 | Dell U2312HM + BenQ G2400WD | Asus Echelon Mechanical Keyboard | Logitech G400s

andyb
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:00 pm
Location: Essex, England

Post by andyb » Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:49 am

http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=57 ... pert&pid=3

Starting on page 3 of the review linked above, there is not a mind blowing performance difference between those 3 cards in most of the tests, and may I add that in some of the tests the 8800GT beats the 9800 GTX.

NOTE:

The 8800GT in question has been factory overclocked to 700MHz (from the standard 600MHz - the RAM has also been given a boost).

The 4850, looks rather good next to the 9800GTX for the money (£90 price difference), but the 9800GTX is a rip off compared to an overclocked 8800GT available for £136 (BFG - 675MHz core).

Either way, it seems that the 4850 (as of right now) look like good value for money for a high-end part so long as it is avaliable at ~ £100 ($200 was the price I saw quoted).

It has my fullest blessing 8)


Andy
Main PC, P180, CM Silent Pro 500M, i5 3570k @ 4.2Ghz, 8-GB @ 2,400MHz, 512GB 850 EVO, 500 Extreme II, 2x 2.5" drives, MSI 660Ti Twin Frozr.
Server, under reconstruction, 380W Enermax Pro82+, positive pressure only.

ryboto
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1439
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: New Hampshire, US
Contact:

Post by ryboto » Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:00 am

the TechPowerUp review shows the 4850 outpacing the other cards in higher resolutions, and in just about every game.
[url=http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=userpage&teamnum=31574&username=rybot]F@H[/url]
[url=http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=36172&highlight=][size=75]Oldest Setup[/url]
[url=http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=48778]Old[/url]
i5-750 | TR AXP-140 | DFI MI P55-T36 | Lan-Gear mITX | HD5850 | Silverstone ST45SF[/size]

Modo
Posts: 486
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 3:32 am
Location: Poland

Post by Modo » Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:34 am

andyb wrote:All things considered AMD seem to have had a bit of a cockup with this one.

Its directly comparable to the 8800GT in the following ways.

Price.
Performance.
Power Consumption.
You forgot to mention: In low resolutions. The same thing applies to the new NVidia models. Basically all the introduced cards show significant gains in 1920x1200 and up. For lower res, "old" cards are usually plenty enough. (But only until game designers start cramming more effects in their engines, but that's still ahead of us.)
Can you keep it down? I'm having trouble hearing the artillery.

Current rig
Old PC

drjunk
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:46 am
Location: Scotland

Post by drjunk » Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:38 am

Matija wrote:I linked that one earlier in the thread ;) Notice 352W system load compared to 319W with the HD3870.

But, things just get more and more weird.

http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-ati-r ... wercolor/7
HD 2900 XT 391 Watt
Radeon HD 3850 259 Watt
Radeon HD 4850 Force3D 269 Watt
Radeon HD 4850 Powercolor 269 Watt

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/HD_4850/21.html
Image
Image


Looks like we're going to have to wait for a while, until Xbitlabs gives us exact power consumption figures.
Jeez....Even the gtx280 burns less power when idle...
Viewsonic VP930 Lcd, Thermaltake (Black) Armor Case, A7N8X-E Deluxe, 2500XP Barton, Thermalright SI-97 With 92mm Vantec Tornado Fan, 1Gb Patriot PC3200 Dual Channel Low Latency Ram, Sapphire Radeon 9800SE (256bit), Zalman ZM80D-HP Gpu Cooler With ZM-OP1 80mm Fan, 250Gb Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 SATA NCQ, Pioneer DVR-109 dvd-r.

ryboto
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1439
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: New Hampshire, US
Contact:

Post by ryboto » Thu Jun 19, 2008 11:51 am

drjunk wrote: Jeez....Even the gtx280 burns less power when idle...
tis a bit odd.
[url=http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=userpage&teamnum=31574&username=rybot]F@H[/url]
[url=http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=36172&highlight=][size=75]Oldest Setup[/url]
[url=http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=48778]Old[/url]
i5-750 | TR AXP-140 | DFI MI P55-T36 | Lan-Gear mITX | HD5850 | Silverstone ST45SF[/size]

Sendorm
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:21 pm

Post by Sendorm » Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:18 pm

what is wrong with the 4850 idle power consumption. I was seriously considering buying one, but after seeing the results I am a bit confused.

More then 40watts idle consumption is outrageous. My current card doesnt even burn that much under load (a seriously overclock 7600gs sonic). 40 more watts under desktop operations is a kill for me considering a whole system power consumption of about 90 watts at idle right now.

At least the 62C idle temp of the card is now explained.

line
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:07 pm
Location: Israel

Post by line » Thu Jun 19, 2008 12:25 pm

This is from the Tech Report:

http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/14967/10

Image

Post Reply